PSA: WARNING!
SCAM ALERT!
Be on the lookout for these two women.
They are hanging out around Port Charlotte, FL Walmart parking lot.
When you are putting your groceries away they ask you for a ride to McDonald's.
They are very convincing and very hot!
Once in your car... this one takes her clothes off and starts climbing all over you, while she keeps you busy, the other one takes your wallet.
I've had mine taken on June 20th, 24th, the 26th.. twice yesterday and probably 2 more times tomorrow. 😳
You've been warned.
A Hungarian psychologist raised three daughters to prove that any child could become a chess grandmaster through early specialization. He succeeded. Two of them became grandmasters. One became the greatest female chess player who ever lived.
Then a sports scientist looked at the data and found something nobody wanted to hear.
His name is David Epstein. The book is called "Range."
The Polgar experiment is one of the most famous case studies in the history of deliberate practice. Laszlo Polgar wrote a book before his daughters were even born arguing that geniuses are made, not born. He homeschooled all three girls in chess from age four. By their teens, Susan, Sofia, and Judit were dominating tournaments against grown men. Judit became the youngest grandmaster in history at the time, breaking Bobby Fischer's record. The story became the gospel of early specialization. Pick a domain young, drill it hard, and you can manufacture excellence.
Epstein opens his book by telling that story honestly and then quietly demolishing the conclusion most people drew from it.
Chess works that way. Most things do not.
Here is the distinction that took him four years of research to articulate, and that almost nobody who quotes the 10,000 hour rule has ever read.
There are two kinds of environments in which humans develop expertise. Psychologists call them kind and wicked. A kind environment has clear rules, immediate feedback, and patterns that repeat reliably. Chess is the cleanest example. Every game ends with a winner and a loser. Every move is recorded. The board never changes shape. The pieces never invent new ways to move. A child who plays ten thousand games will see most of the patterns that exist in the game, and pattern recognition is exactly what chess mastery is built on.
A wicked environment is the opposite. Feedback is delayed or misleading. Rules shift. The patterns that worked yesterday may be exactly the wrong patterns to apply tomorrow. Most of the real world looks like this. Medicine is wicked. Investing is wicked. Building a company is wicked. Scientific research is wicked. Almost every job that involves a complex changing system with humans in it is wicked.
The Polgar sisters trained in the kindest environment any human can train in. Their success was real and the method was correct. The mistake was generalizing the method to fields where the underlying structure of the environment is completely different.
Epstein's research is what made the implication impossible to ignore.
He looked at the careers of elite athletes outside of chess and golf and found that the pattern was almost the inverse of what people assumed. The athletes who reached the very top of their sports were overwhelmingly people who had played multiple sports as children, specialized late, and often switched disciplines well into their teens. Roger Federer played squash, badminton, basketball, handball, tennis, table tennis, and soccer before tennis became his focus. The kids who specialized in tennis at age six and trained year-round for a decade mostly burned out, got injured, or topped out at lower levels of the sport.
The same pattern showed up everywhere he looked outside of kind environments. Inventors with the most patents had worked in multiple unrelated fields before their breakthrough work. Comic book creators with the longest careers had drawn for the most different genres before settling. Scientists who won Nobel Prizes were dramatically more likely than their peers to be serious amateur musicians, painters, sculptors, or writers.
The skill that mattered in wicked environments was not depth in one pattern. It was the ability to recognize when a pattern from one domain applied unexpectedly in another. That kind of thinking cannot be built by drilling a single subject. It can only be built by accumulating mental models from many subjects and learning to move between them.
The deeper finding is the one that should change how you think about your own career.
Specialists in wicked environments often get worse with experience, not better. Epstein cites studies of doctors, financial analysts, intelligence officers, and forecasters showing that years of experience in a narrow domain frequently produce more confident judgments without producing more accurate ones. The expert builds elaborate mental models that feel comprehensive and turn out to be increasingly disconnected from the actual structure of the problem. They stop noticing what does not fit their framework. They mistake fluency for understanding.
Generalists do better in wicked domains for a reason that sounds almost mystical until you understand the mechanism. They have less invested in any single mental model, so they abandon broken models faster. They are used to being a beginner, so they are not threatened by the discomfort of not knowing. They have seen enough different domains that they can usually find an analogy from one field that unlocks a problem in another. The technical name for this is analogical thinking, and the research on it is one of the most underrated bodies of work in cognitive science.
The single most useful sentence in the entire book is the one Epstein puts almost as a throwaway.
Match quality matters more than head start.
A person who tries six different fields in their twenties and finds the one that genuinely fits them will outperform a person who picked one field at fourteen and stuck to it on willpower alone. The lost years were not lost. They were the search process that produced the match. Every field they walked away from taught them something they later imported into the field they finally chose.
The reason this is so hard to accept is cultural, not empirical. We tell children to pick a path early. We reward the prodigy who knew at six. We treat the late bloomer as someone who failed to launch on time, when the data suggests they were running an entirely different and often more effective optimization process underneath.
The Polgar sisters were not wrong. The conclusion the world drew from them was.
If your environment is genuinely kind, specialize early and drill hard. If it is wicked, and almost every interesting human problem is, then the people who win are the ones who refused to specialize until they had seen enough to know what was actually worth specializing in.
You are not behind. You were running the right experiment all along.
A female sea lion leaping onto a fishing boat while carrying her pup to escape a pursuing orca, showcasing instinctive maternal defense🤍
📍 Seattle in November 2025,
Dear W. Europeans and Canadians (🇪🇺🇬🇧🇨🇭🇳🇴🇮🇸 🇨🇦):
1⃣ You implemented the double if not triple standard of the 1991 Arbitration Commission of the Conference on Yugoslavia and the 1999-2008 Kosovo sui generis hack regarding border changes in Yugoslavia.
2⃣ We warned you about double standards, opening a can of worms, international law, the 🇺🇳 Charter, territorial integrity, sovereignty, and setting a precedent. You dismissed it all, opting to bombard us with platitudes about a Euro-integrated borderless utopia. You coerced each post-1999 Serbian 🇷🇸 government into de facto accepting your latest encroachment on our territorial integrity. Offering endless rounds of negotiations where we would be pressured to trade off sovereign rights in exchange for false promises that would never (fully) materialize and were riddled with fine print. I hear that the 🇷🇺 aren't falling for such tricks anymore.
3⃣ You even smothered an unpopular 2018 land-swap initiative (whereby Serbia would exchange parts of its sovereign territory for other parts of sovereign territory) by exclaiming that Kosovo - a breakaway Serbian province whose recognition by you violates our territorial integrity and sovereignty - should have its territorial integrity and sovereignty respected!
4⃣ You've had time to learn your lesson in Georgia 🇬🇪(2008) & the Ukraine 🇺🇦 (2014-22) when your transatlantic globalist 🇺🇸 ally reignited the first cross-border wars on European soil since 1945. I won't even delve into the the multiple destructive effects of processes of disintegration and aggression in the Global South as I know little of their background, frequency and causality with regard to the Kosovo(-Badinter) precedent.
5⃣ You are now faced with the Danish Greenland conundrum. Surely the 🇺🇸 wouldn't seize or coerce you into ceding 🇬🇱? Тhink again. They can and they most probably will, NATO be damned. Trump has already announced punitive tariffs on countries sending soldiers to the island. Might even use LNG as leverage. I hear that Macron, Meloni and Merz are winking at 🇷🇺? Perhaps regarding gas and oil? Perhaps because they feel the toldyasos of AfD, RN, Reform et al. breathing down their necks? I neither know nor care.
6⃣ Be prepared for the worst unimaginable outcome. And this is just the beginning of a litany of humiliations. The 🇬🇧 and 🇫🇷 should seriously inquire into how the Donroe Doctrine will treat the Falklands/Malvinas (especially given the 🇦🇷 Milei-Trump relationship), French Guiana, the Caymans 🇰🇾, the BVI 🇻🇬, Bermuda 🇧🇲, Montserrat 🇲🇸 etc. After all, remember how the 🇺🇸 dismantled the British and French Empires post-1945 and the 1956 Suez Crisis. Let's not forget the Dutch 🇳🇱 and their former Netherlands Antilles.
7⃣ My fellow 🇨🇦, Carney's rapprochement with 🇨🇳 is cute but we both know how Trump might retaliate by supporting Albertan secessionism and further profit from Western Alienation, an embedded weakness of the Canadian socio-political architecture.
8⃣ Finally, when you find yourself expressing disgust over an injustice or a double standard, remember the Roman saying - quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi - what is permissible for Jupiter is not permissible for an ox. No need to explain which one is you in the maxim.
Welcome to the brave new world you co-created, remember to have fun and hate the (great) game, not the (great) player.
Wow the non Tennis establishment mainstream media are suddenly beginning to speak up about the Sinner and Swiatek doping cases.
You have to question why Tennis commentators seem to be the only ones now publicly still defending Sinner and Swiatek?
The tide is very much turning.
@MyLordBebo There is a town in Serbia between Belgrade and Novi Sad called - "Putinci" . It translates to roughly to - Where the Putin's live
And why wouldn't you believe a large population of Russian's originated from Serbia. Serbs populated most of Donbas in the 1700's