You should lean into the overall vibe of the thing, but ultimately it should be more ambiguous. It should be intensely, violently itself, but if I know what it is I will shit in the theater and ruin your career
True, but both positions failed one hundred years ago and all marxist thought since has, in one way or another, tried to overcome the split and avoid the pitfalls. Especially bc taken too literally both positions converged in accepting uncritically the results of +
I really don’t get homophobic and transphobic communists. Like what are ya’ll even doing? Why are you taking the most socially progressive movement in history, a movement that is sometimes centuries ahead of society at large, and just deciding that actually it’s good when this 1/
Even as an undergrad, I was disgusted with this rhetorical move from analytic thinkers. So, you didn't understand a major figure in the history of philosophy? When that's literally your job? How is this not just a giant banner saying "fire me because I can't do my job"?
Something kind of fun about being into game studies is how it is that casual investigation into how games actually function and the attitudes they reproduce kind of begins to horrify you
Students at Dresden University of Technology are protesting a research project between the institution and Israeli defence firm Elbit Systems after a university ethics panel voted against the cooperation, but the rectorate approved it anyway. (1/2)
Lula, who in 2004 sent 1,200 Brazilian troops to assist George Bush in the invasion and U.S. military occupation of Haiti, once again betrays Latin America’s proletariat by sending aid to the right-wing Bolivian regime which murdered a member of the general strike on May 23rd.
Gravestone of Alfred Schnittke, showing a fermata over a whole rest marked fff. Said differently, a long silent rest, held indefinitely, quiet with a thunderous intensity (fortissimo).
Urban agriculture can be done well and it can be done poorly, but to dismiss it entirely is to ignore reality. It’s utility is context and technique dependent
I remember despising Soviet monumental painting for its affectedness, its commercialism, its total lack of sincerity.
Members of the Artists' Union — a bureaucratic elite — were probably the least educated and most corrupt chunk of the whole Soviet establishment.
The theatre, music and film crowd was relatively progressive, carrying forward the traditions of the great Soviet cinema of the 30s, absorbing the genius of national republic cultures — from the extraordinary Georgian filmmakers to an open dialogue with the European New Wave.
But painters were easier to control, easier to dictate style and rules to. They were also paid insane money and basically functioned as employees of one single state-privileged marketing agency serving the entire country.
And yet — I'm looking at these murals right now and my heart is just melting. None of that childhood rage, none of that irritation is left. All I can think is: what magnificent artists — this Galina Zubchenko and Grigory Prishchedko. The way they curved it, twisted it, rolled it out. Pure joy.