OTRO ESCÁNDALO DE LA GOBERNADORA MORENISTA DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, MARINA DEL PILAR.
Y ahora el madrazo viene desde la propia casa.
Amílcar Olán, íntimo amigo de Andy López Beltrán y uno de los empresarios que florecieron como bugambilia con contratos durante el sexenio de López Obrador, aparece en una grabación presentada por Carlos Loret de Mola (@CarlosLoret) diciendo sobre Marina del Pilar Ávila (@MarinadelPilar):
“También le di dinero para su campaña”.
Y por si faltaba cariño entre compañeros de transformación, antes la llama:
“la sinvergüenza de Marina”.
¡Qué bonita familia!
Ahora resulta que el amigo de Andy dice que puso dinero para la campaña que llevó a Marina del Pilar a la gubernatura de Baja California.
¿Lo declaró?
¿Está registrado ante el @INEMexico?
¿De cuánto estamos hablando?
Porque el dinero para las campañas no se entrega como cooperación para la carne asada.
A Marina del Pilar ya le retiraron la visa estadounidense —sin que se haya hecho pública oficialmente la causa— y ahora aparece Amílcar Olán diciendo que financió su campaña.
Pero tranquilos.
Seguro mañana Morena nos explica que Amílcar no dijo lo que dijo, que Marina no recibió lo que dice que recibió y que el verdadero problema, como siempre, será quien difundió el audio.
La transformación podrá tener muchos escándalos…
pero qué bárbara disciplina para no investigar ninguno.
Hace 25 años atrás, helicópteros de la policía de Nueva York se acercan a la terraza del WTC tratando de rescatar gente, pero no había nadie, ellos no sabían que las puertas estaban cerradas con cadenas y nadie pudo llegar ahí para ser rescatado
#11settembre#11Septiembre#11s
I find these World Trade Center simulations by Kostack Studio fascinating because they remove the smoke and let you see the collapse much more clearly.
In the real footage, so much is hidden by fire, dust, debris, distance, and chaos that many people come away with the impression that the towers simply dropped straight down into their own footprints.
But that is not really what happened.
These simulations make it much easier to see that the collapse begins in the heavily damaged and fire-weakened region, the upper section starts moving and tilting, and the destruction then propagates downward through the structure.
The towers do not simply disappear vertically into their own footprints. Large portions of the upper structure and exterior are moving outward and to the side as the collapse develops. Much of that motion is simply obscured in the real videos once the enormous debris cloud forms.
And this is also why I find these simulations useful when people describe the collapses as looking like “controlled demolition.”
Strip away the smoke and dust and the resemblance becomes much less convincing.
What you see is a highly asymmetric structural failure beginning around the aircraft-damaged and fire-affected floors, followed by an enormous moving mass progressively overwhelming the structure beneath it. There is tilting, rotation, exterior columns peeling away, debris being thrown far outside the building footprint, and structural failure occurring chaotically as the collapse moves downward.
That is very different from the neat mental image usually implied by “controlled demolition,” where structural supports are deliberately severed in a carefully timed sequence to produce a predetermined collapse.
And importantly, we already know what preceded these collapses.
Both towers suffered massive aircraft-impact damage. Fireproofing was stripped from portions of the structure. Large, uncontrolled fires then burned across multiple floors - for about 56 minutes in the South Tower and about 102 minutes in the North Tower - heating and weakening structural components until collapse initiated.
Once that upper mass began moving, the loads imposed on the floors and structure beneath became vastly greater than anything they had been designed to carry.
The result was progressive collapse.
No, an animation is not proof simply because it looks convincing, and these are not official NIST simulations. They are visualizations built under particular assumptions.
But as visualizations, I think they are extremely useful.
They let you see something the original footage often cannot show clearly: beneath that enormous cloud of smoke and debris was a complicated, violent, asymmetric structural failure - not two buildings neatly dropping straight down into their own footprints.
A note on the simulation: this is not intended to reproduce the collapse down to the exact motion of every beam, floor panel, and fragment of debris. No practical simulation could do that. Its value is in modeling the large-scale structural behavior - how the major sections deform, move, tilt, separate, and progressively fail. Think of it as a visualization of the mechanics and overall collapse behavior, not a frame-by-frame reconstruction of where every piece of steel ultimately landed.
A true 9/11 survival story, as told by Brian Clark and Stanley Praimnath.
Two strangers, three floors apart in the South Tower.
Told as closely as I could to their own public accounts.
…Como aquí se los dije desde principios de año.
EL HUACHICOL FISCAL AVANZA TOOOOOOOOOODOS LOS DÍAS
Pensarían ustedes que después del escándalo mundial de barcos decomisados, el grupo en el poder habría cesado su ambición.
PUES NO…
La “honestidad valiente”
Sigue ROBANDO a MEXICO 🇲🇽
#UnderMyWriting #UMW