@Cointelegraph 700M moving to Chainlink is cool but real question is who controls the agents making those payments. Sentient's bet is that the agents should. Not Chainlink, not any single entity
@MTSlive@jgreze@TownAI is building lol autonomous stuff that handles this exact problem, connects to your inbox calendar slack and figures it out on its own. no setup, no prompts, no config. it works like a product not a dev tool.
@trident_of_eth@cloutchaser_69 the failure variety across that many tasks feeds skill creation directly, so iteration quality grows with how wide the task spread is
$sENT down 18% on the week while they ship EvoSkill v1.2.0, Harbor plugged into 190+ benchmarks, and a public Arena challenge on the same day. market really sleeping on open source AGI rn huh
@2xnmore entry price is the whole game fr. same token different universe depending on when you got in. been watching $SENT closely, Sentient with $85M raised and Founders Fund backing, feels like that pre-narrative window everyone wishes they caught later.
Everyone in this space is holding the same 5 tokens.
The difference is not which ones.
It is what price they got in at.
$TAO at $258 is not the same trade as $TAO at $480.
$ONDO at $0.80 is not the same bet as $ONDO at $2.40.
$RENDER at $4 is not the same conviction as $RENDER at $14.
$QUBIC at $0.000012 is not the same patience as $QUBIC at $0.00007.
Same token. Completely different outcome.
Most people are not early. They just think they are.
Tell me I am wrong.
@Olivelinex@Bloome_im workflow sounds solid but who actually owns it if the platform vanishes? thats the part Sentient gets right imo, community models that stay yours not theirs