@StrategicWin5@larrybehrens@RyanAFournier Pick one, ย (ISW)
Critical Threats Project (CTP)
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS),Institute for Science and International Security Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD)Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA)
International Atomic Energy Agency
@BetBr0@Osint613 Thatโs not analysis, itโs coping. Iran can disrupt, not dominate. The U.S. still has overwhelming naval power and global shipping leverage. โDisgracing the U.S.โ doesnโt survive contact with reality.
@StrategicWin5@MOSSADil The statement:
Cherry-picks the most negative interpretation
Ignores evidence of partial military success
Frames a complex, ongoing conflict as a simple failure
@alastair_ak47@JayTC53@MarioNawfal The figure โ5 million people killed by the U.S. in the past 26 yearsโ is widely circulated online, but it does not come from a verified dataset or mainstream scholarly consensus.
@MuhammadAli_PhD@MarioNawfal This isn't Iwo Jima. U.S. drones can systematically neutralize defenses and map the island before troops land.
Casualties would likely be far lower than historical amphibious assaults, though some risk remains.Drone coverage post-landing ensures defenders canโt regroup.
@EuromaidanPress The US sends zeroโ โ
This is flat-out false.
The United States is by far the largest total donor to Ukraine.
Total commitments (military, financial, humanitarian):
Roughly $70โ100+ billion depending on whatโs included and timing.