if theres one thing we know from all of human history, its that when there is a surplus of young able bodied men that feel they have no purpose or future, that only very cool and good things can possibly happen
People seek entertainment and fun to escape their miserable lives. To become famous and popular on social media, offering an escape from real life is essential.
@ManipulatePower Power structures are self-reinforcing, and the fittest and most adaptable is not the individual itself, but the power structure itself.
Assume a situation where you have a 1 in 10 chance to be considered a "winner" — does this imply fitness, or is it a symptom of a system?
Meritocracies can only exist where political maneuvering is impossible.
This only includes extreme outliers like Olympic competition.
Effectively 100% of the time,
Meritocracies do not exist.
The only way to determine truth is to:
- Rigorously analyze
- Apply a deductive or scientific method to a problem
Which is exactly why the political theater invariably:
- Shallowly dismisses and attacks problems
- Uses loaded, inaccurate rhetoric
- Disparages rigorous analysis
Each layer of a power hierarchy is marked by:
- Deference up the chain
- Universal mutual benefit
- Most benefit at the top, trickling down
- Exclusion of outsiders
- Demonization of disrupters
- Each individual striving to be an "infrastructure" node (non-problematic)
It is essential to avoid seeming too intelligent in professional situations
This is counter-intuitive to most
"But if I appear intelligent, then I will be respected more"
Capability is perceived:
0-35%: Contempt
35-115%: Indifference
115-130%: Wary admiration
130%+: Defensive
It is common that an intelligent individual identifies organizational improvements:
1. More transparency
2. Merit-based rewards
3. Improved communication
4. Enhanced efficiency
And more
All without realizing that this destabilizes entrenched power structures
And he is removed
To win a population's trust, consider the strategies:
1. Honesty of one's opinions
2. Emulation of the population's most common opinions
3. Emulation of the population's most zealous opinions
It is obvious that the third option is the most effective.
Engagement is control.
Even primates understand concepts of fairness, freedom, war, power, and politics on a basic level.
Then why do humans disagree on fundamental stances?
90% of the time, the answer is differing objectives
10% of the time, the answer is differing values
All fabricated division.
Consider:
Someone with a flawless, charismatic ability to lie
But must repeatedly compromise their proclaimed ideological stances for selfish gain
Versus
Someone who tells the honest truth
But who must compromise their stances due to circumstances
How does one distinguish?
The right-wing prioritizes tradition, individual accountability, and national strength.
The left-wing prioritizes progression, collective accountability, and social safety nets.
The leaders of both parties truly prioritize their keys to power above all else
Do not be deceived.
Dimwit: Ignores nuance, takes appearance of reality at face value
Midwit: Embraces nuance, takes appearance of reality with a grain of salt
Highwit Good: Dispels unnecessary nuance, interpreting reality accurately
Highwit Evil: Adds nuance to muddy and distort reality
Common.
As far as reality is concerned
The two base truths are perpetuation and dissolution.
Structures perpetuate themselves and components ultimately dissolve.
"Death and taxes": Dissolving components and self-perpetuating systems.
Everything else is an observation of circumstance.
Just as nuclear reactors harvest the entropy of radioactive material
Power structured harvest the entropy of their dissolving constituents
This property is omnipresent
From corporate hierarchies to the laws of nature