SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze

Let's make the world a better place, one trade at a time.

(I identify as hypermasculine and my pronouns are Dong and Schlong)

[Possum Reviews @ReviewsPossum]

Last night, I read the entirety of C.S. Lewis' The Screwtape Letters. It's a novel told in the form of letters written by a demon to another demon instructing him on ways to manipulate his "patient" to do evil.

This one quote sounded familiar.

[IMPERATOR @IMPERATORAUS]

The elites of any civilisation have always been the wealthy – but the kind of wealth matters.

Across Greece, Rome, China, and Japan, societies recognised a basic political fact: the merchant class, however successful, pursued its own gain and was kept at arm's length from political power.

This was not a claim that wealth is immoral, but rather a recognition that landed aristocracy and commercial wealth produce different loyalties.

A landowner's fortunes are tied to the stability and long-term health of the state, and his prosperity depends on the survival of the polity because his wealth is rooted in the land.

Merchant wealth, by contrast, is mobile and easily detached from any single community. It can be shifted, hidden, or relocated the moment conditions change.

Landed elites were not immune to corruption, but their abuses were constrained by ties to the land. Merchants, by contrast, are financial nomads who can plunder cities or empires and vanish before the damage settles.

The wealthy landed aristocracy is anchored to the commonwealth, but the merchant is loyal to his coffer and abandons the city the moment it ceases to serve his interests.

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

@Manifest_Lord No links to the trials cos they dont exist. Blocked.

[George? @GeorgeStevens11]

Imagine you're in the club and the DJ drops this.

[Tanya @tanyaelisabethh]

If I stay home and raise my own children I am a loser and not ambitious

But if I hire and pay another woman to raise and take care of my children for me than I am an empowered woman

If that same woman stayed home with her children she would be a loser

But if she takes care of my children she is not

If we both switched and raised each others children for a paycheck we would be successful ambitious girl bosses

But if we do it for our own children we are losers

[Nick Knipe @kniborg]

@KirkLubimov Straight from Hayek's road to serfdom. If you want big gov b/c you don't like the sociopaths running big corporations, just wait until you centralize the power into a single source (gov), and discover who gravitates there and ends up on top.

[Coach Noah Revoy | Arms Dealer For The Soul 🏴‍☠️ @NoahRevoy]

I am going to tell you a deep secret of the English language. When we want to tell the truth, we use Germanic-derived words. When we want to lie, we use Latin-derived words.

- Germanic (Old English) words → concrete, direct, sensory, testable
- Latinate/French words → abstract, bureaucratic, distancing, often euphemistic

Death / harm
Germanic (plain, testable):kill, die, hurt
Latinate (distancing, euphemistic):terminate, expire, neutralize, collateral damage

👉 “We killed civilians” vs “There was collateral damage”

Lying / deception
Germanic:lie, cheat, hide
Latinate:misrepresent, obfuscate, prevaricate

👉 “He lied” vs “He misrepresented the facts”

Money / exploitation
Germanic:take, steal, pay
Latinate:appropriate, extract, leverage, monetize

👉 “They’re taking your money” vs “They’re extracting value”

War / violence
Germanic:fight, bomb, burn
Latinate:engagement, kinetic action, force projection

👉 “We bombed them” vs “We conducted kinetic operations”

Bureaucracy / responsibility
Germanic:you broke it, you did it
Latinate:mistakes were made, systemic failure occurred

👉 Notice how the subject disappears.

Money / exploitation
Germanic:take, steal, pay

Latinate:appropriate, extract, leverage, monetize

👉 “They’re taking your money” vs “They’re extracting value”

War / violence
Germanic:fight, bomb, burn
Latinate:engagement, kinetic action, force projection

👉 “We bombed them” vs “We conducted kinetic operations”

Bureaucracy / responsibility
Germanic:you broke it, you did it
Latinate:mistakes were made, systemic failure occurred

👉 Notice how the subject disappears.

If you see a public statement filled with Latin-sounding words, you are being fooled, tricked, manipulated, or lied to.

[🇨🇭🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿InLucysHead🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇨🇭© @InsideLucysHead]

Oxford University researchers have discovered the densest element yet known to science...

The new element, Governmentium (symbol=Gv), has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312.

These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called pillocks.

Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert.

However, it can be detected because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact.

A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to complete.

Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2 to 6 years.

It does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.

In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganisation will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes.

This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical concentration.

This hypothetical quantity is referred to as a critical morass.

When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium (symbol=Ad), an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium, since it has half as many pillocks but twice as many morons.

[Justin Credible @GravySauceCream]

LEEEEEEROYYYYYYY JENKINNNNNNS

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

Likelihood?

[奶奶 capital @testinprodcap]

what prof. jiang thinks is gonna happen in the bifurcation.

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

Legit

[BowTied Biohacker @BowTiedUM]

https://t.co/BIQU08ro8w

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

Brilliant analysis of the destruction wrought by feminism. Is it an emergent property or a bio-weapon?

[Atlas Press @realAtlasPress]

https://t.co/YPDmCc7t6P

[Atlas Press @realAtlasPress]

https://t.co/YPDmCc7t6P

[Morgoth @MorgothsReview]

Paedo elites to Prince Andrew:

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

Absolute banger

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I am today launching Restore Britain as a national political party.

Join us.

https://t.co/RMtEuHopgV

[Klara @klara_sjo]

Reparations, but for conspiracy theorists.

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

Why the recent price action in #silver should keep you up at night https://t.co/ZdGcBeBkkR

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

@Helios_Movement Maybe Argentina

[Max @minordissent]

evergreen

[SimpleCryptoLife #fiatsqueeze @DatCryptoLife]

The most important and terrifying post of the year so far

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

A vast number of humans, probably a majority, aren't people.

They are large language models.

I'm not saying this as a generality, as a clever or funny way of saying, "they are stupid".

No. I mean something very concrete and specific, and there are a lot of people who appear very intelligent, maybe even win awards for writing good poetry or something, who are nevertheless not people, not fully sapient, just a large language model walking around in a human body.

First, you have to understand what a large language model is.

It's a computer (organic or inorganic), which has been trained on a data set consisting solely of language (written or spoken), and rewarded for producing language that sounds like the data set, and is relevant to a prompt.

That's all there is in there.

This is why ChatGPT and Grok lie to you constantly.

It's not because they are somehow just indifferent to the truth — they actually do not understand the concept of "truth" at all.

For something to be a "lie", or an "inaccuracy", there has to be a mismatch between the meaning of words, and the state of reality.

And there's the critical difference. You see, in order to identify a mismatch between the state of reality, and the meaning of a sentence, you have to have a model of reality.

Not just one model, of language.

This is why Grok and ChatGPT hallucinate and tell you lies. Because, for them, everything is language, and there is no reality.

So when I say someone is a large language model, I do not mean he is "stupid". He might be very facile at processing language. He might, in fact, be eloquent enough to give great speeches, get elected president, win the Nobel Peace Prize, and so on.

What I mean is that humans who are large language models do not have a robust world-object model to counterweight their language model. They are able to manipulate symbols, sometimes adroitly, but they are on far shakier ground when trying imagine the objects those symbols represent.

Which brings us to this woman.

Most conservatives understand her behavior in terms of concepts like "suicidal empathy", or "brainwashing", or an "information bubble", interpreted as reasons why she is delusional, but the truth is far worse than that.

To delusional is to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong. But to have an object model of the world that is deeply and profoundly wrong... you have to have one in the first place.

To sapient humans, words are symbols, grounded in object model of reality, that we use to communicate ideas about that reality. We need those words because we don't come equipped with a hologram projector, or telepathic powers.

But for another type of human, that object model isn't very large or robust at all. It consists only of a grass hut or two with a few sticks of furniture, and it can never be matched up with the palaces in the air which she weaves out of words.

And so, to her, there is no reality. Or at least very little.

Reality consists only of her and her immediate surroundings in time and space, and words referring to anything bigger or more complicated are not descriptions of reality... they are magic spells which will make other humans drop loot or give her social approval.

You cannot correct her worldview with contradictory evidence, because there is no worldview to correct.

You cannot confront her with the logical inconsistencies in her worldview, because her object model doesn't actually have any, it's not complex enough for that.

The relevant parts of her world-object model can be summed up as follows:

"If I say Goodthing, I get headpats and cookies from all the people like me."

That model is simply not big or complicated enough to contain notions like self-defense or vehicular assault. She has no theory of mind for a man whose job includes violence. She cannot explain or predict his behavior.

It is too far away from her daily experience to fit into her reality at all.

And if she can't imagine things like these, how can she possibly imagine concrete meanings for vast and complex ideas like demographic replacement, culture shift, and western civilization?

This is not about intelligence or lack of it. This is about what her brain is trained to do.

Her upbringing, education, and life did not force, or even encourage, her to develop a robust world-object model. It wasn't necessary for her to get safety, approval, or cookies. She just had to be glib.

So it really didn't matter if she had an IQ of 125, or whatever, because if she did, then she was just an IQ-125-large-language-model, and only used that brain capacity for writing clever poetry, and saying things that aligned her to her local social matrix.

She couldn't actually understand the world no matter how smart she was, because her brain was trained up wrong.

I don't know if this is correctable, or if there was some critical developmental phase that was missed, but it doesn't matter, because once the LLM-humans are adults, they won't sit still for corrective therapy, percussive or not.

What's important is that they can't be taught things. They can be programmed to repeat stuff, and if you win a culture war, you can even program them to say the sensible stuff. But even then, they will just be saying it for headpats and cookies. They will never truly understand the sense of what they are repeating, because they don't understand things.

They are just Large Language Models.

And we have to figure out some way to take the vote away from them.