A CISD alone is not enough to justify a trade.
One of the biggest things I learned from GXT is that the CISD must be protected.
For a CISD to be protected:
• Price should originate from a clean key level
• The CISD should form from that key level
• The key level must remain respected after the shift
If a CISD forms without a clean key level behind it, I consider it unprotected and usually pass on the setup.
I also want to see a clean draw on liquidity. Protected highs and lows often make poor targets and can reduce the probability of continuation.
Another detail is the reaction from the key level. Strong V-shaped reactions show displacement and intent, while deep retracements can weaken the setup.
The quality of a CISD is determined by the context around it, not the CISD itself.
The trader who refused to quit. From zero to buying a house as a full time trader
Ft. @crypto_mazino
All things perps and macro trading
( 0:34 ): Early crypto journey
( 2:24 ): Evolution of trading style
( 5:50 ) Mistakes with leverage
( 11:00 ): Current vision/bias on the market
( 12:34): Hyperliquid
( 15:40 ): Advice for new perp traders
( 20:10 ): Trading and Life outside of crypto
GM, guys
On the 1D, $BTC has absorbed the daily OB – no longer relevant. Price is again squeezing into the 100 EMA, moving toward the local ATH 76K. Above sits monthly R2 76.5K and the seller block, where I’d like to see a test and reaction.
According to the 15M heatmap, liquidity has formed in this same range, as well as below around 73K and lower at 70K.
L2 KDJ remains in the overbought zone.
Overall – nothing has changed so far. Have a great Friday🙌
Spot CVD...
... as one of the most important leading indicators for $BTC 👇
CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta) tracks the net difference between market buyers and market sellers (we call this side of the trade the "aggressive side").
If CVD is rising, it means market buyers are stepping in more aggressively than market sellers.
Now just because market buyers are more aggressive does not mean price has to follow that aggression. That’s because on the other side of every market order is a limit order providing liquidity.
If aggressive buyers are met by strong passive sellers sitting in the books with limit orders, their buying can get absorbed, preventing price from moving higher.
This is where context matters.
If we see spot CVD rising but price not following, we need to ask: why?
Is it:
→ Passive spot sellers absorbing all that aggressive buying? Or..
→ Futures traders selling, offsetting the spot demand?
That distinction is key!
If it’s spot absorption, it suggests real supply is sitting overhead (bearish).
If it’s futures selling, it’s often just positioning, which can get squeezed if price holds.
Same CVD behavior, completely different implications depending on who’s on the other side.
Futures are simply positioning -> leveraged directional bets on where participants think the Bitcoin (spot-) price will go.
So when you see:
→ Spot CVD rising = "real" buying,
→ Futures CVD falling = traders are shorting/closing longs,
…and price holds the low, it means those shorts are being absorbed by passive buyers with true demand from the spot market.
And that’s where the edge is... real demand vs weak positioning.
Layer this data on top of a proven trading system with key levels (e.g. rVAH + VWAP reclaim confirms strength)... bingo 💰
#Bitcoin #BTC
$BTC
Here is a 10-m video on how I approach all my trades (Top-Down Analysis)
0:30 - Daily TPO
1:17 - Weekly TPO
2:27 - Monthly TPO
3:19 - Aggr (Delta)
4:32 - Weekly Trend Analysis
6:20 - How I mark out my ranges
7:35 - How I use EMAs in my system
9:20 - Next Trade Setups
Giving away 2x 1 Month Membership for my Private Discord 🏆
How to join?
- Follow me
- RT this post & write a comment about your biggest struggle in trading :)
Good Luck 🍀
@OliverSuccess_ My biggest struggle is disciple and controlling emotional. struggling in not respecting stop loss and keep revenge trade until i loss more i can afford
Most trading groups take your money and give you nothing
The Saloon gives it to a kid fighting for their life
$99 entry → 100% to Make-A-Wish
or sign up on Bitunix/BTCC → rebate goes to the kids
400+ members. $11,500+ raised. Every receipt public.
https://t.co/4XkVXI6rsV