I have a simple question to ask on X.
Why are mainstream journalists and media outlets not examining the public evidence regarding Andy Burnham's role in the cover up of the Pakistani Rape Gangs during his tenure as Greater Manchester Mayor?
Serious questions have been raised by whistleblower Maggie Oliver. The public deserves to know why Burnham promoted an Assurance Review in Oldham described as 'nothing short of a cover up'.
Put aside my personal views for a moment. There are two possibilities here. Either Burnham and his so called team of experts set about delivering a sham review and protecting Labour Party politicians, council official and police officers, or concerns raised by a respected whistleblower are also baseless.
Journalists should be examining the facts and timeline in detail so voters can judge for themselves. Not one has. Why? With Burnham set to become Prime Minister, why is the evidence of his role in the Pakistani Rape Gang cover up being ignored?
The evidence is available for scrutiny, yet as the election approaches, there appears to be little media pressure to address this head-on. Just what do you think will happen once he becomes MP?