@GoodmanHoops@TheFieldOf68 NCAA determines team eligibility for NCAA tourney. DQing teams for infractions hasn’t been tested legally as far as I know but they’ve done it. FIFA has much more power and got taken to the woodshed over an idea nobody wanted. NCAA loses if they attempt to DQ the big boys
@sbuck67 I’d have preferred they use it getting a Miazga replacement acclimated. Love Miazga but the CB line needs change.
They have a top tier offense in MLS. I still use Leagues as a way to make the defense better in preparation for an MLS Cup run. If it leads to Leagues Cup…gravy.
@Flyinlionpod 1)Barreal 2)Evander 3)Lucho 4)Orellano. Orellano fantastically caught a team sleeping. Lucho’s was a lot of open space not defended at all. Teams should know by now Evander can score from anywhere so expect him to try. But Barreal - I don’t know how you defend that.
@AshleyDavis32 The fanbase already believes they’re not serious about winning - ever. Castellini asked where we’re gonna go. There are a ton of ways to spend my time and money in Cincinnati. The Reds are no longer one of them. But hey, I did get to watch the 1990 World Series win.
@NCAA_PR The athletes in the Ohio suit would agree. They want the rules enforced consistently. They aren’t challenging the age based rule. They’re suing because the rule is being applied differently to them. The NCAA is removing eligibility they would otherwise have. That’s the point
@Jaybird304@fiago7 Austin would have been good. Love Salt Lake but they dont have a viable stadium. I don’t think UofU football can fit standard soccer field, and RSL fans are great but the stadium is a dump.