@SCADAhacker From an academic point of view I very much agree, it's quite difficult to hit the right multidisciplinarity AND field experience that is needed to do research on this kind of security. Maybe the coming of IoT will motivate unis to create a cyber physical security track...
Specification-based anomaly detection:
"First thou pullest the Holy Pin. Then thou must count to three. [...] Four shalt thou not count, neither shalt thou count two, excepting that thou then proceedeth to three. Five is right out."
King Arthur: "Right. One... two... five."
@mcclure111 Agree on all fronts. Although I come from a country that tried to blame scientists for earthquakes, so having a gov is not the same as the gov listening to the experts... 😅 but I see your point.
So, liability is the primary factor when deciding how an AI will make decisions: not "is it good" but "will I get the blame?" 😂 https://t.co/8s4SGTM81M
I'm thinking that access to low level data means almost nothing to potential attackers without high level knowledge... Can we secure that? https://t.co/Xg1aDDT8tn