@kierstarmer, Can you please explain to me why you have ignored my emails to talk about my daughter Rhiannons murder,by an ILLEGAL, But now meeting Henry Nowaks family following his tragic death? Both white British people, oh I know your corrupt police assisted his death!
SHE REPORTED CHILD ABUSE 181 TIMES. BRITAIN SAID NOT NOW, THANKS.
Sara Rowbotham was an NHS sexual health coordinator in Rochdale. Between 2005 and 2011 she filed 181 detailed referrals to Greater Manchester Police and social services.
Each one named victims. Each one described systematic rape and trafficking of girls as young as 11. Each one went nowhere.
She was not ignored because the evidence was weak. She was ignored because the evidence was inconvenient.
Authorities labelled her not credible. Her team was dismissed. The official reason given for inaction was community cohesion.
Read that again.
Community cohesion. While children were being passed between men like property, the priority was keeping things quiet.
She was made redundant in 2014.
A 2024 independent review confirmed every referral she filed was credible, substantive and appropriately communicated. The same review identified 96 men still considered an active risk to children. Still out there. In 2024. Because the original response scraped only the surface and called it a job done.
Five police officers refused to cooperate with the review. They were not charged. They were not recalled. They retired on pensions.
Sara Rowbotham got an MBE.
The system that failed 181 times got a press release about lessons learned.
If this does not alarm you, you have not understood it yet.
@BBC@guardian@AndyBurnhamGM
Sadiq Khan's pilgrimage to Mecca reveals his hypocrisy.
Where are his "Trans Pride" flags? Why isn't he calling for women's rights and LGBTQ tolerance? Where are the other religions, the Jews and the Christians?
As London Mayor, Sadiq calls for religious plurality, higher immigration and for us to accept lots of Muslims into our country. Why isn't he doing the same in Saudi Arabia?
This a pilgrimage to the spiritual centre of the faith that guides him. And in Saudi Arabia, there are no churches or synagogues. As in much of the Muslim world, Jews and Christians were converted, expelled or slaughtered. The government still prohibits public worship from Jews or Christians, unlike Sadiq Khan's London, where he encourages mass public Islamic prayer.
Why isn't Sadiq Khan calling for Jews and Christians to be accepted in Saudi Arabia and their public worship to be funded by the Saudi government?
Clearly, it's politically expedient for Sadiq Khan to support religious plurality, women's rights, and LGBTQ rights in Britain now, but Britain's demographics are changing fast. The Muslim population is increasing rapidly, while the native British population declines.
Once the demographic tipping point has been reached, will Sadiq and politicians like him still stick to the values that suit them now?
Or will they switch to supporting the values that will be more politically expedient in a Muslim majority country, the values that are on display in Saudi Arabia?
The Sturgeon Files🏴⚡️: "All of the missing donations have gone towards Scottish Independence, I guarantee it" - Lying toad Ian Blackford from within the House Of Commons in 2022.
Watch as former SNP Parliamentary Leader Ian Blackford LIES to the entire country, giving a guarantee that ALL of the missing SNP members funds has not been stolen and will go to an 'Independence' vote.
Surely this must carry some legal ramifications for the bloated Ian Blackford?
He made these false statements during the police investigation which deceived SNP supporters to the veracity of Sturgeon, Murrell and the party's credibility which now lies in ruins.
“Free Palestine.”
I grew up on those words.
In Lebanon, most people around me wanted a free Palestine for a very practical reason — to send the Palestinian refugees back. The civil war that tore my country apart was ignited in no small part by the Palestinian armed factions who turned Lebanon into their launching pad. “Free Palestine” meant: free us from them.
In Damascus, where my father’s family lived, the sentiment was different but equally self-serving. Palestine must be returned to the Arabs, its righteous owners. No one asked follow-up questions. No one was expected to.
Palestine was central to Islam, most Arabs are Muslim, therefore supporting the Palestinian cause was reflexive. A non-brainer in the most literal sense — no brain engaged at all.
Nobody stopped to point out that Palestine is not an Arabic word. Nobody found it strange that Jerusalem, the supposedly third holiest city in Islam, is not mentioned once in the Quran. Not once. Nor is Palestine. The entire theological and political architecture of this cause rests on a foundation that their own scripture doesn’t bother to acknowledge.
What was actually happening was indoctrination. A systematic, generational rejection of Jewish sovereignty — and frankly, of any minority sovereignty. Jews, Christians, Druze, Kurds, Assyrians, Yazidis — the Arab world has been remarkably consistent in how it treats people who are different. We just don’t talk about that.
Instead, in the West, we talk about Palestine.
In the West, a civilization that has elevated human rights to its highest moral currency, the Palestinian cause has become the one exception to every rule. In the queue of human suffering, Palestinians cut the line every time. Homosexuals executed in Gaza and hanged from cranes in Iran? Palestine first. Women imprisoned in Saudi Arabia for campaigning for the right to drive — a right they were denied until 2018 — girls sold into marriage in Afghanistan, women erased from public life entirely under the Taliban? After Palestine. Political dissidents ground into dust in Syrian and Egyptian prisons, journalists disappeared in Libya, children starving in Yemen while their rulers wage proxy wars, entire populations hollowed out by hunger in Sudan? All of it waits. Christians ethnically cleansed from Iraq and Syria, the Arab world methodically emptied of every Jewish community it once held — a demographic erasure carried out across a century with surgical patience and near-total Western silence?
Palestine is still first.
So let’s end where we started. Free Palestine. Which Palestine, exactly? The Roman invention? The British administrative line? The British Mandate covered the entire territory of what is today Israel, the West Bank, Gaza and Jordan. In 1921, 78% of that mandate was handed to the Hashemite family — a dynasty imported from Hijaz in present-day Saudi Arabia — and became the Kingdom of Jordan, which it remains to this day. A foreign royal family, on the majority of historic Palestine, ruling it as a monarchy. Nobody protests that. No flags, no chants, no encampments. The remaining 22% was designated for the Jews, became Israel, and is the only part that any pro-Palestinian activist has ever had a problem with.
So when you say Free Palestine, you mean that 22%. You mean the Jews.
And free it from whom? From a people with a three-thousand-year-old documented presence in that land, to restore the glory of a name coined by Roman colonizers, a name lifted from the Torah, a name that has no roots in Arabic, no mention in the Quran, and no history as a sovereign state?
You are not chanting for liberation. You are chanting for colonialism — the Roman kind, repackaged for social media.
Free Palestine is not a cause. It is a colonial term, coined by invaders, recycled by the indoctrinated. The least you can do is have the intelligence to understand it and the decency to reflect on your position.
📍#Israel
Congrats to the duplicitous Andy Burnham on making a success of being a landlord ( what would his lefty mates say? ) having bought a 2-bedroomed flat in London 20 years ago , seeing it double in value to £500K and now being rented out for a handy £3K-3.5K.
Where Burnham was fortunate and other landlords weren’t, is that for years the interest on his mortgage was paid through his expenses because he was an MP.
But he took an even bigger advantage by renting out his place in Kennington and instead rented a place nearby and sent the whole bill to the taxpayer.
That’s now illegal but basically he took advantage of an Xs racket in Parliament making him, in my view, unsuitable to be an MP.
He’s a creep and he wants to bring that thought process to Downing Street.
The more you hear of Burnham the more you know the good people of Makerfield won’t be voting for him.
It's the 20th Anniversary of Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth."
NONE of his scary predictions have come true.
Mt. Kilimanjaro still has snow and Glacier National Park still has glaciers.
Here's why we are not doomed:
Why do political figures keep describing Keir Starmer as an honest man with integrity?
From his forgotten 7 acres, Beergate, to penthouse living, to free suits and specs, to lying by omission re Chagos, WFA, to his unwavering willingness to chuck anyone under a bus to save his own skin...
He epitomises a man who has failed upwards, ensuring he tramples on all and sundry whilst doing so.
If that amounts to honesty and integrity, heaven help us!
PANDEMONIUM broke out in Tower Hamlets as Pakistani and Bangla factions of the Awami League clashed at a town hall meeting.
This aired live on BANGLADESHI TV and one of their new MPs was in attendance.
This is democracy in modern London.
The leader of the Lib Dems, and the leader and deputy leader of the Green party, think some women have penises. In itself, it seems like a relatively unimportant matter. But it is symptomatic of a contempt for science and evidence-based truth. Could you vote for a flat-Earther?
It’s in another country. Meanwhile in this country English boys are arrested *whilst bleeding to death* under false charges of ‘wacism’.
Stick to your job, you two-tier wankers.
I am taking my complaint against the BBC over David Olusoga’s Empire to the next stage.
Its latest response is not merely inadequate. The BBC now says, in effect, that it need not clearly signal the controversial character of Olusoga’s interpretation, and that Britain’s imperial history is not contentious enough to require a properly balanced range of views.
That is not impartiality. It is the Corporation relaxing its own standards when they become inconvenient.
Read my thoughts at The Biggar Picture: https://t.co/E7GFR72OUC