The 2024 Tsai Today newsletter is online! We invite you to check it out and learn more about the Tsai Center's programs and people: https://t.co/tmzFLKGAb9 @SMULawSchool@smu@davidotaylor @nathancortez @MeghanJRyan@JasonPNance @SMULawAdmission
While the #Federal Circuit remains the nation's primary expositor of #patentlaw, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board has evolved into the most powerful institution in the nation's #patent system.
Read More: https://t.co/GKz2PpBpxA
Subscribe: https://t.co/Ht8nmVVFU0
#LawTwitter
#SMU Professor @davidotaylor studies the relationship of the Federal Circuit and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board as a matter of institutional choice through 10 years of case law, giving insight into this understudied area. #researchwithimpact
@babayagaoptions The judges decide that day, but their decisions trickle out depending on the type of decision and order/opinion. It could be days if it is a dismissal or summary affirmance, within a week or couple weeks if it is a simple nonprecedential opinion, or months if it is precedential.
Professor @davidotaylor's article, "The Federal Circuit and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board," was published in @J_PTOS.
🔗 Read: https://t.co/rS2XjMXTzX
SMU Dedman School of Law is thrilled to welcome @ShaniShisha as an Assistant Professor of Law, starting fall 2024.
His teaching and scholarship focus on intellectual property law, copyright law, and the intersection of law and technology.
🔗 More: https://t.co/oHKfYMm6n1
Complimentary registration is open! ➡️https://t.co/h1pDrb8aHE⬅️ 19th Symposium on Emerging Intellectual Property Issues: Intellectual Property & The Business of Innovations on Friday, Feb, 24th @SMULawSchool. 4 hrs CLE pending. @davidotaylor @MustangBarSMU
Four basic principles should guide any legislative effort to correct patent eligibility law: broad eligibility, clarity, constraint on judicial intervention, and flexibility. Senator Tillis's bill, while not perfect, holds the potential to check all these boxes.
@design_law In general this list is focused on circumscribing the broad inclusion of processes. Europe has a different list of exclusions, but both exclude "business processes" and "methods for doing business." Should hedging have been eligible? Speed dating? Impressionism?
@design_law In 2019 I commented negatively on the draft legislation limiting eligibility to a "field of technology." I referred to dictionaries to try to understand "technology." https://t.co/F3XwxMLMYc I have less concern here given the context and following language limiting its impact.
Senator Tillis's bill is a significant improvement over the legislation proposed in 2019. Indeed, the bill addresses many of the concerns I identified then in my testimony. https://t.co/F3XwxMLMYc
As I testified in 2019, "Patent eligibility law is in a state of crisis, and legislative reform is needed to eliminate that crisis." Senator Tillis's bill seeks to address the confusion, incorrect results, and reduced investment my research identified. https://t.co/F3XwxMLMYc
#SMULawSchool Profs. @nathancortez and @MeghanJRyan named as Co-Directors of SMU Dedman School of Law's @SMUTsaiCenter. They join founding Co-Director and Prof. @davidotaylor who is currently leading the Center. @SMU Read more: https://t.co/Tg5VgyAz8y
Justice Breyer's Last Act? One of Justice Breyer’s last acts as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court might be voting to deny a petition for a writ of certiorari in an important patent eligibility case decided by the Federal Circuit. https://t.co/oW4L1OEgj0