@daem0n__@asukagrypr Okay, then water sanitation plants or conveniences store fridges, like people are saying. Still worth preparing for in case of attacks, no? You don't have to take it to the logic extreme and hyperfocus on a specific case, don't be pedantic
@nicksaraev That was actually really high quality. Perhaps the best educators soon enough will become the best users of AI? Anyway I mean it really did all sound so natural and look so polished, even knowing that the HTML was AI-made and whatnot at a glance. Gotta brag but I didn't need subs
@sushantkumar67@visegrad24 ..that they themselves trapped. Oh and these people will now be transferred into Russia without the choice to go to Ukraine. Fantastic...
The Oleshky ceasefire is another trap imposed on Ukraine by its russian-American “friends.”
Here’s what raises serious questions:
1. An information blackout. Only Newsmax, a pro-Trump, MAGA-aligned media network, is reportedly allowed on the ground. Ukrainian and independent international journalists have been denied access. Why?
2. Who is overseeing the evacuation on the US side? Mark Beckman, Melania Trump’s private adviser and producer of her film Melania. His professional background is in marketing and entertainment. Why him?
3. russia is using the pause to strengthen its positions. Ukrainian military sources report that building materials, ammunition and military supplies are being delivered to russian forward positions on the left bank of the Kherson region. There are reports that russia is preparing assault operations for November.
4. And where are the people being taken? Oleshky residents are reportedly being evacuated to russia, not to Ukrainian-controlled territory.
This is being presented as a humanitarian operation. But when journalists are denied access, russia gets an opportunity to strengthen its positions, and Ukrainian civilians are taken to the occupying country, one question demands an answer:
Whose interests does this “ceasefire” actually serve?
Ukraine must not be forced to sacrifice its citizens’ safety for someone else’s political show. Humanitarian aid must never become a cover for entrenching an occupation.
But here we are.
@michalmalewicz@danvdrsn@thekitze So why do you want to criticize the Ukrainian president and not Russia's then? Answer this one question: Who did the bucha massacres?
@michalmalewicz@danvdrsn@thekitze As a Ukrainian, we are proud of him. We can be proud and also criticize corruption that might even be linked to people from his party, but we do not think he is personally corrupt. He was one of the most popular figures in Ukrainian and Russian media before becoming a president