☆ ⁵

혜인 !

[☆ ⁵ @dazzibelle]

@ryusteroid seola pqp lindo isso

[dominic @ryusteroid]

quanto mais eu leio sobre as acusaçoes de plagio de how sweet e eta, mais eu fico impressionada com a facilidade que as pessoas tem de aceitar qualquer narrativa

a linha vocal que apontam como "evidencia" acompanha a propria melodia guia da musica. se a melodia foi composta primeiro e a letra foi escrita em cima dela, eh natural que exista semelhança

e tudo isso acontece enquanto o newjeans vem enfrentando uma enxurrada de cobertura negativa desde que entrou em conflito com a gestao da hybe

[luna ୨ৎ @luenacore]

🚨 Fun fact: Both lawsuits for "ETA" and "How Sweet" show clear signs of a predatory legal strategy called "Copyright Trolling."

This is not a real fight about artistic integrity. It's a legal shakedown where companies weaponize the court system to scare big targets into paying a quick cash settlement out of court

Here is exactly how this "lawsuit factory" is targeting NewJeans:

1. The Copy-Paste Evidence: The two lawsuits are separate cases handled by different law firms. Yet, both court documents contain the exact same unique typo, spelling Minji's name as "KIN MIN-JI." This shows they were mass-produced using a shared boilerplate template.

2. Holding Apple and Coca-Cola Hostage: The plaintiffs intentionally sued NewJeans' biggest corporate partners, Apple and Coca-Cola. They know massive global brands hate bad press. By dragging them into court, they create instant corporate panic to pressure the label into paying a quick cash settlement to protect their advertising deals.

3. The Confirmation: Billboard officially confirmed that the company suing over ETA is the exact same entity that used this identical strategy to extract a quick cash settlement from the rapper Pitbull years ago. They also intentionally waited nearly two years for NewJeans' songs to make millions globally before launching this attack.

The most alarming detail in the Billboard report is that HYBE and ADOR did not respond to immediate requests for comment. By failing to answer, they left the international media completely unanswered, leaving the girls utterly defenseless, but this isn't suprising as the CEO of HYBE, Lee Jae-sang himself stated he intended to ruin the image/brand value of NewJeans.

[nati ୨୧ @retrokki]

to keep it short: neither danielle nor the other newjeans members signed a double contract. what’s telling is that danielle’s lawyers are the ones who had to come out and publicly clear the names of ALL the members. meanwhile, ador remains silent

[e @pomusana]

"they had no reason to do that to rookies" and what they actually did was call out their manager for workplace harassment and their company/belift for stealing newjeans' concept plans. the fact that hybe threw those girls under the bus by revealing it was illit and leaking messages that included information about the illit members which hanni had intentionally left out on purpose, isn't newjeans' fault. hybe wanted to shift the attention away from hybe, the manager and belift and they succeeded by name dropping illit. y'all just too slow to realize that.

[s•fi @giveupdontup]

Every time HYBE starts media play, their loyal dogs fuel this wave of hatred toward NewJeans, and then they use the bunnies' responses to pretend they're being attacked for no reason. For two years, they’ve been helping HYBE destroy these girls

[p. Lapse 🐇 @howsweettttt]

@ILLITPROTECT You literally shared sources that had nothing to do with the claims you were making and refuse to delete it because you “don’t want to come across as wrong” but if you need to lie to defend your favs doesn’t that mean something weird is happening? Lol

[K ☆ @kimberleyhehe]

Delete the old post. Its not the 1st time yall have shared false info. It has done so much damage already. Comment under all the similar "protect" accounts saying its false information. Just like this post.

[L @jeansgratis]

“i feel hurt by the spread of incorrect information when i see social media but tokkis clear up the misunderstanding and i was grateful because i felt like they knew how we feel without us having to say anything”

[kali @njzwars]

Empresa que literalmente vaza dados de menores de idade, dados médicos e também vaza imagens do dormitório. Posta um vídeo PÚBLICO no seu próprio canal falando que 5 meninas com integrantes de menor são objetos para atrair homens, olha pra 7 meninos com de menores também e diz que ver algo sexy neles, cria arquivos que incentiva o hate em seus próprios grupos e outros dentro do kpop. É bizarro quanto insistem em culpar 5 meninas quando foi a própria hybe que começou com isso tudo. Vcs esquecem que esse caso foi tentando inúmeras vezes ser resolvido somente na empresa sem a mídia, e a hybe foi e divulgou pra mídia começando com isso tudo

[dominic @ryusteroid]

eh muita cara de pau eles difamarem o newjeans tentando saturar a imagem delas na midia quando a ceo da ador CHOROU na frente das cinco pedindo pra elas voltarem kkkkkkk empresa mais sem vergonha nao existe

[myra ᪥ @22KMJ]

Her words still stand strong till this day.

[MinotaurKard @MinotaurKard]

Genuinely crazy how you guys link a source that doesnt even mention the incident, doesnt mention hanni, doesnt mention illit

Actual illiterates

[dominic @ryusteroid]

eh impressionante como as pessoas pegam uma materia, ignoram o que esta escrito nela e passam a repetir uma versao completamente diferente dos fatos

o artigo discute unicamente as alegaçoes da ador contra danielle, nao que documentos judiciais mostram que a mhj instruiu a hanni a acusar o illit de algo. a proposito, o artigo nao cita a hanni, muito menos o illit. isso foi uma interpretaçao inventada por VOCES

[raiden 🇧🇷 @haerinflow]

1 - You posted the wrong link; the article doesn't mention anything about that incident.

2 - According to the transcript that the media is releasing, mhj requested that >>sejong<< include this phrase in the ppt presentation, she didn't consult Hanni about anything

[mariz @marihaez]

estão distorcendo de novo, a defesa da Danielle não pediu que as outras integrantes fossem processadas.

o argumento é simples: se a criação da NJZ foi quebra contratual, por que só a Danielle foi processada? A defesa questiona essa seletividade, não tenta prejudicar as outras

[duds 🏎️🏁 @howsweetsotty]

Hot take: quem vem estragando o kpop é a hybe nessa tentativa de monopolizar a indústria

[fredy (im a girl) @fredyfunzbear]

"face filled with jealousy"
Literally Danielle:

[NEWJEANS BRASIL @NEWJEANSBR]

Lembrando que a Hyein começou a modelar com 8 anos, aos 11 ganhou um Daesang por modelar, estreou no NewJeans aos 14, 5 meses depois se tornou embaixadora da Louis Vuitton e ainda fez uma colaboração musical com a IU aos 15, a convite da própria.

Não tem jeito, é a nossa super maknae 💜

[jas🌻⁵ @newjified]

“the newjeans girls aren’t friends anymore” you mean the same girls that were willing to give up everything including the newjeans name to stay together until they had no choice? y’all would rather fall for hybe propaganda than listen to the one girl who can speak for herself.