@PBDsPodcast Oh come on, fuck the money. That's not the point of this debate. Saying he won because of money and fame is pathetic. You disappointed me.
@RealCandaceO This was unnecessary. We all know what happened and who is to blame. This "man" was thinking about a cigar the whole time, I guarantee you. I'm still in disbelief and I can only see his foot shaking. But you buried him anyway.I wonder how much he got paid for this.
@MrsErikaKirk I read between the lines because that's how it's done with people like you. I only read wisdom. Do you think you're wise?What did you mean by this!!! You may have to do all that you do, but children won't forgive you. Neither yours nor anyone else's.Sorry!!!
šØ BREAKING:
A U.S. soldier removed his uniform for the last time in support of Gaza.
He showed it to the camera, saying, āIām taking it off for the last time,ā before raising the Palestinian flag.
āI cannot remain silent about Gaza.ā
šØ BREAKING:
A US Air Force active-duty serviceman set himself on fire in front of the Israeli Embassy in Washington, shouting, "I will no longer be complicit in genocide!"
šØšŗš¦Protests Against Volodymyr Zelenskyy's Regime Are Still Ongoing in Ukraine!
As Zelenskyy reshuffles ministers at will, Ukrainians - mostly women, as many men have been kidnappe - continue to protest.
EU is trying everything to hide this from the public.
šØBREAKING: Charlie Kirkās cameraman is preparing to go on the record, alleging Erika Kirk doesnāt want the truth about Charlie Kirkās assassination to come out because itāll expose her.
He also says that Erikaās primary focus was securing control of Charlieās multi-million dollar empire and legacy all along.
Those of us who gave Erika the benefit of the doubt are about to get a masterclass in why you must always trust your gut over any rationalization, even if it doesnāt make any sense.
Dear @MrsErikaKirk
Honestly, I didnāt feel the need to make a big post or comment about your attendance at the correspondentsā dinner. Where you go or what you do isnāt really something I focus on unless it has a direct impact on things I care about. That said, thereās a pattern thatās hard to ignore, whenever youāre called out for something people perceive as inappropriate, your response tends to be to insult your critics or position yourself as above them, while dismissing others as malicious. At some point, it may be worth recognizing a simpler reality. Many people just donāt like you. And thatās their right. People are free to form their own opinions, even when those opinions arenāt favorable.
Maybe you genuinely donāt see what youāre doing wrong and maybe the criticism you receive feels completely unfair. But have you ever taken a moment to ask yourself, - What part am I playing in this? If you truly arenāt doing anything wrong, then why do the reactions you get seem so consistently at odds with what you expect?
Guess what, there could be a hundred Candaces in the world criticizing you and it still wouldnāt move people unless what theyāre saying actually resonates. People donāt just fall for narratives that easily especially today. You cannot force someone to see something they fundamentally donāt see or donāt believe. That kind of influence is incredibly difficult to manufacture just ask the CIA they will tell you all about it.
Quick history lesson, even organizations like the CIA with billions in funding, massive infrastructure, coordinated networks and thousands of operatives have had to invest enormous effort over long periods to shape public perception in any meaningful way. And even then, results are never guaranteed. So the idea that one commentator (Or two or three) no matter how skilled, can single-handedly turn people against you just doesnāt hold up.
The reaction youāre getting isnāt because of Candace, itās because of you. Your own actions are what people respond to. Thatās the uncomfortable reality, wake up to it already, I say this with no hate. At some point, you have to stop deflecting and ask yourself an honest question: why does this keep happening to me? Why do people consistently react this way? Weāre not living in North Korea, people are allowed to form and express opinions freely and as long as America is America they will do just that, it is their right, just like it is yours to be unhappy about it. Dismissing all criticism as manipulation avoids the real issue here.
And letās be clear: youāre not some untouchable public figure in the mold of Jacqueline Kennedy. That comparison doesnāt land the way you think it does. Whoever told you, you could be her is not your friend, get rid of him/her. Curve your own path. Again I donāt say this to be disrespectful.
This isnāt coming from a place of hate, not at all, itās frustration. A lot of people are tired of the constant back-and-forth, the blame-shifting and the refusal to reflect. You are clearly bothered by all of this, but I donāt see you saying, ''Oh, you know what? These people donāt like me no matter what I do. Itās so unfair, but maybe I should step out of the limelight for a while and see if things change. So it doesnāt hurt the company.''
No, instead, you come out and you have no problem attending parties, dinners and opening events with Nicki Minaj, holding hands, even though your husband clearly didnāt like her. Iām guessing he didnāt like her because most of her songs start with a dick and end with a pussy, or one inside the other (should I tag the songs?). Iām sorry for the expression, but itās not mine, it is the womanās you chose to have on stage next to you. Then, at that same event, youāre going to mention the Lord like 50 times and have a literal former stripper speaking in front of students about how they should live. Then you go ahead and criticize the students and everyone else who judge you for this. Do you see the problem?
As Leo Tolstoy wrote, ''All happy families are alike, each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.'' And while you can understand it as - everyone grieves differently, the point he made was actually much simpler, dysfunction is usually self-generated and unique in its causes. And if Tolstoy were around today, he might put it even more bluntly: no one creates their own problems quite like you doā¦
I assume youāve seen my post, most people have, so youāre aware that my opinion of you is far from favorable. That said, in my capacity as a journalist, I havenāt made a habit of targeting you or spending weeks analyzing your every move, event, or speech. I only comment on matters where you have influence over issues I care deeply about. Quite frankly, Iām not extremely interested in you, especially when our country is facing serious challenges.
But whatās actually concerning to me is watching you come out and double down on claims that are demonstrably false. Saying things like, ''Candace Owens is accusing me of murdering my husband,'' or that people who criticize you are evil or something similar, this is simply not accurate. She has not accused you of murder. Not publicly anyway. So why say it?
Because you're reframing the criticism into something more extreme than it is. Youāre acting as if anyone who questions you must believe you were involved in your husbandās death and that they must be all evil, while you must be a constant victim of this supposed malice. Thatās not whatās being said here at all.
Letās be clear:
The issue people have with you is different, itās behavioral, not criminal. Iāve described you as a person exhibiting traits of psychopathy and I stand by that as my opinion. Again Iām allowed to have one, just like you are allowed to disrespect it. Iām not saying this to be cruel, I mean it seriously. Psychopathy reflect something deeply complex and very difficult to deal with in life, not something trivial so trust me when I say, I do not say this with hate at all. It ās a simple observation.
You may disagree, that is your right. And it is my right to expressing my opinion on a public figure that has made herself a target by refusing to leave the spotlight and cameras even when she gets a negative feedback constantly. Constantly!
And to be precise, if you go back to what @RealCandaceO actually said, her claim was that she intends to prove that something is off about you. She did not say she intends to prove you killed your husband. Those are two completely different arguments and conflating them only distorts whatās actually being discussed. It also should be noted that Charlie Kirkās investigation is ongoing for Candace and for most of us, and the āCharlieās Brideā series Candace produced is separate from that ongoing investigation. That is why it is placed separately as an 8-episode series on her YouTube. It is a standalone thing. I kindly invite you to check it out.
So to put it plainly, someone could lose a spouse in a completely unrelated event, like a car accident and still face criticism if their behavior afterward appears detached, performative, or inconsistent with what most people understand as grief. Being criticized for how you act is not the same as being accused of murder. And if Charlie had died in a car accident and you behaved the way you are behaving now, the reaction would be the same (I can speak for myself her). So no, this is not about Charlie or Candace, itās about you. People are questioning your behavior and what it suggests about your character. Thatās the real issue, not murder.
You can keep saying that everyone grieves differently, but apparently this nation and others as well has never seen anyone grieve the way you do that is why they keep talking about it. So maybe you should take a step back and reflect. When millions of people (And they are in millions, this is why it got to the point where it bothers you and your organization) are telling you something feels off, you donāt lash out. You take time to ask yourself why people perceive you that way, especially if you believe that perception is absolutely incorrect. Thatās the mature response. Rolling your eyes at people and calling them names isnāt the answer, especially if you want a public career or hope to lead others.
And if you donāt want that scrutiny, then walk away. The spotlight is not for everybody. Or take an example from your husband, who was a warrior, he handled it perfectly. He faced being hated all the time and he still engaged them and accepted them he didnāt tell them to shut up. If he thought people who criticized him were evil, he wouldnāt be sitting in front of them trying to understand their point and help them.
You have the money, youāre taken care of thanks to Charlie. If the spotlight is a burden, step aside and let someone else take on the role, someone the public will accept. If you do that, youāll likely be forgotten in six months and you wonāt have to deal with criticism anymore. You will be able to finally live privately, attend events all day long and no one will care.
But when you say that 'evil people wonāt stop you from having it all or what your husband built for you or whatever idea is driving your actions and you say youāll continue regardless of what people think, great, good for you - but then you should expect people to do exactly that: THINK. And their opinions may not align with what you want. Thatās life. Get over it.
You claimed you attended the dinner not to mingle with influential people or enjoy the spotlight, but to meet some journalists who have written negatively about you, to put faces to names. Well, letās put a face to the name. Iām ready to sit down with you any day, at your convenience, even in your own studio if you prefer. Youāre not the only one who values being direct. So here I am, willing to have a genuine conversation. The offer stands. No hate, no disrespect. Just a difference of opinion. Letās see if what you say is true.
And if you canāt handle an interview with someone who disagrees with you and doesnāt like you,then thatās fine. I totally understand that. Not everyone can do what Charlie did - engaging directly with critics instead of avoiding them.
In that case, you can always put a face to a name in Utah court. Come see me in court, where your husbandās supposed killer is on trial, I'm always there. I suggest you bring a pre-prepared lunch, it can be an absolutely grueling ordeal. Sometimes it goes on for 6+ hours with only 15-minute breaks, with no time to go out and eat. But we sit through it because itās important. Itās Charlie Kirk!
We are interested in who killed Charlie Kirk and whether we have the right guy and if we do, we want to see that the process goes exactly how it should. So yes, you can find me there. I havenāt seen you even once, not once attending the hearing. Maybe one day you can show up. I bet it will help with the criticism part of things :)).
You said you like directness, so do I. So here you go. Iāll leave my invitation open for you to sit down with me.