🚨BREAKING: ICE agents, working with state police, pulled over a vehicle, in Ogden, Utah… and smashed their car window because he wouldn’t roll it down all the way.
Watch the shift… because this is where it goes from aggressive to completely out of control.
The driver already has the window partially open. The ICE agent is yelling, giving a countdown, threatening to break the window… while another officer is trying to open the door from the other side.
No explanation, or clear threat… Just escalation.
Then, someone inside says, “I’m a U.S. citizen… you pointed a gun at me.”
And that’s the moment everything changes.
Instead of pulling back… instead of correcting… instead of even acknowledging it…
The ICE agent snaps.
“I don’t give a shit who you are, I don’t know you.”
And then he immediately escalates further… raises the metal bar… and starts hitting the window… doubling down on force.
A person says you pointed a gun at them… and your response is not to de-escalate…
It’s to get MORE aggressive.
That’s retaliation.
They call them “non-compliant”… and within seconds, the window is smashed and the driver is dragged out.
And it doesn’t stop there.
The passenger… who is recording… gets told to “stay there” while the officer puts his hand on his gun.
He responds, “I’m recording for my safety.”
The officer shuts the door on him anyway.
When he opens it again and steps out… and then the officer physically shoves him back into the car.
This is what needs to be understood…
The escalation didn’t come from a threat.
It came the second someone spoke up…
the second someone said, “you pointed a gun at me”…
The second someone started documenting it.
That’s when it got worse.
That’s when it turned physical.
That’s when the window broke.
And that’s what should alarm people… because that’s not about safety anymore.
That’s about being challenged… and responding with more force.
I do not usually comment on political posts, and this is not intended to be political. As we all know a tragic event happened in America. I am speaking strictly from a professional training and use of force perspective.
Before coming to train Ukrainians, I spent years training various law enforcement organizations through my company on use of force and high risk encounters. That background includes departmental policy, police training standards, threat assessment, de escalation, and the legal thresholds for justified and unjustified shootings.
Several facts matter here.
The individual involved was a licensed concealed carry holder from the state. He was legally permitted to carry a firearm, including in a public setting such as a protest. There was no violation of law simply by his possession of the weapon.
At no point did this individual draw, point, or openly brandish the firearm. The weapon was physically removed from him by law enforcement officers prior to the shooting. Once that occurred, the immediate deadly threat no longer existed.
When a weapon is secured and officers have physical control of a subject, the legal and training based justification for deadly force disappears. At that stage, the situation transitions to control, restraint, and de escalation. Deadly force is reserved for an active, imminent threat, not a past or hypothetical one.
Any use of deadly force also carries an absolute responsibility to consider public safety. Officers are trained to identify their backstop and ensure that rounds fired do not endanger civilians or fellow officers. In this case, there were multiple officers and civilians directly within the potential line of fire. The risk of catastrophic injury, friendly fire, or unintended civilian casualties was extremely high.
Equally important, this incident does not align with established de escalation principles. Rather than slowing the encounter, increasing distance, and reducing risk, the situation was escalated rapidly to lethal force after control had already been achieved. That is the opposite of what modern policing doctrine teaches.
Based on the available video footage, camera angles, and observable officer behavior, this incident reflects failures in threat assessment, use of force decision making, backstop awareness, and de escalation. From a professional standpoint, it represents a breakdown across multiple training and policy standards.
This is a tragic outcome. It deserves a serious, objective review grounded in established law enforcement practices, not emotion or politics.
This definatley deserves a full independent investigation and review.
i don’t have any words anymore for the level of disrespect being shown by the president and the vice president to US allied soldiers.
These words from Rufus Gifford former US Ambassador to Denmark say it all.
I can say speaking for the 593 British heroes (the largest loss from any contingent of a U.S. allied forces in Afghanistan and Iraq) in those conflicts, I am utterly disgusted.
🎥 TikTok - https://t.co/ziMkF0hPYG
BREAKING: After Trump went on a tirade this morning about the commercial below featuring Ronald Reagan, Ontario’s premier, Doug Ford, has just announced that the commercial will play during GAME ONE of the World Series tonight to MILLIONS of viewers.
BREAKING: After the release of an ad that caused Trump's tantrum ending trade talks with Canada, the original video of Ronald Reagan slamming tariffs has resurfaced. He called the new ad "fake."
The original destroys Trump on tariffs.
Share this widely.
BREAKING: In defiance of Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orban, protestors in Hungary stormed the streets to voice their opposition to authoritarianism. This is being almost entirely ignored by mainstream media. Let’s make it go viral.
This morning, MAGA is trying to rewrite history—claiming Reagan was anti-immigrant and pro-protectionism.
But the truth is, Reagan stood for almost everything Trump opposes.
It’d be a real shame if this went viral.