@sir_ben_son Haven't looked into eMMC, but would assume similar throughput on these MCUs. Need to check. Regarding power, estimating ~500mW with everything active, medium load, haven't measured. Let me know when you need something built ;)
@sir_ben_son Not quite, but similar to Pico/RP2350. ESP32-S3 with a bunch of peripherals, CAN bus, AMOLED with touch on the back, and the option for WiFi/BT. Curious if everything's going to work, is a first ;)
All your files. Under your roof.
Introducing Files on umbrelOS.
Create, upload, and organize — just like you’re used to, but on your own home cloud. No monthly fees, no Big Tech, no distant servers.
Arriving in umbrelOS 1.4 (February ‘25). Public beta out rolling out today.
The power to switch. The freedom to control.
Introducing umbrelOS 1.3.
🔄 Swappable apps: Effortlessly switch between Bitcoin Node, Bitcoin Knots & Libre Relay, or Electrs, Fulcrum & ElectrumX.
✨ New features: Cloudflare DNS and Factory Reset.
⚡ Faster & smoother: Enjoy a snappier UI, and essential bug fixes.
Public beta out now!
WebAssembly: A promising technology that is quietly being sabotaged.
We have a great opportunity ahead to make of Wasm a great technology that it's stewarded by its community.
Your opinion matters, lets make Wasm shine ❤️
https://t.co/kHB0CsAOnK
Breaking: Turns out removing the 'web', and with it any form of useful web platform integration, from WebAssembly and replacing it with 'serverless' didn't exactly skyrocket adoption rates. Who could have guessed? But hey, delusion or not, "be the mold." 🤷♂️https://t.co/tnf70THmCF
@lunacraftsDaily Corporate provoking problems (kneecap Wasm by sabotaging its web story) to then present the cause (the non-web whatever Component Model) as the solution, shoving one misleading ad disguised as a news article down your throat per week, hoping that you'll buy their "solutions".
"WebAssembly [...] has finally started becoming usable by ordinary developers", immediately pivot to present its unasked-for enshittification as the solution, and conclude that "tech is full of hype that over-promises and under-delivers". Exactly my humor😅https://t.co/9VJMReR1Aa
Watching the DOJ antitrust announcement vs Apple right now. Makes me wonder if folks realize that the storyline isn't very different from similar conduct that has been kneecapping WebAssembly, and probably web standards in general, for an eternity by now. To obliterate choice.
Technology Choices Offense, 2024 Edition. Why so anxious? 🤔 Ah, it's one huge deception? WebAssembly isn't actually meant to improve Web tech? It's not even remotely open? Because app stores? So bury in bizarre complexity? Then tax every inch? I see, go ahead.
Meanwhile, yet another déjà-vu from 2017: "The Importance of Strings to WasmGC", 2023 edition. This time proudly presented by: Google. https://t.co/S1UpTHYYxk
@syrusakbary@lorenc_dan From today's perspective I'd say this is basically embrace, extend, extinguish all over again, just that this time it's not Microsoft but a tech cartel of earth's shittiest companies trying to own every inch of Wasm to skew it to their competitors' disadvantage :(
Why am I not surprised that the Bytecode Alliance is now roundhouse attacking Wasmer over WASIX... lol... while yet again accusing those it decided to attack of misbehavior. As if people were so stupid. Unbelievable.
Makes me realize that by now, pretty much everything we've said, from strings to intrigues, has been proven true. I hope you don't mind the awareness. And that it makes a difference.
Bytecode Alliance now has an official special interest group (SIG) to basically recreate AssemblyScript. Not only that, their initial experiment copies entire files from AS, with licensing headers removed. Impressive.
Bytecode Alliance now has an official special interest group (SIG) to basically recreate AssemblyScript. Not only that, their initial experiment copies entire files from AS, with licensing headers removed. Impressive.