@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 16: The PDSA cycle is about continuous improvement. What was learned from this class and our case study is on-going. During the EdD program, learning will continue to be improved upon – the PDSA cycle can help manage those improvements. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 15: Education is the opportunity to nurture socially just leaders. By teaching & empowering students to be active citizens and advocate for equity and inclusion, future social justice leaders are developed, continuing the pursuit of justice for all. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 14: The symbolic frame was demonstrated when my division was renamed from Academic Affairs to Academic & Student Affairs. Adding student, the population we serve, to the name, all division areas are represented as contributing to CSU student success. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 13: To develop socially just leaders, better social justice integration into leadership prep programs is needed. Intersecting social justice driven curriculum, pedagogy & assessment with critical consciousness, knowledge, & skills could achieve that. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 11: While a leadership style may fit a university/organization’s mission, it may not be a good fit for the many diverse aspects of that organization. The leadership style needs to be able to respond and adapt to the requirements of an organization. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 10: Body language can display authority or approachability. Knowing when to use these expressions is key. In the political frame, body language can impact how a leader is perceived and how effective they are at building coalitions and support. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 9: Including stakeholder feedback in decision making allows multiple perspectives to be considered. If stakeholders are more involved in making a decision, they will be more dedicated to ensuring a successful outcome. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In #8: The human resource frame emphasizes the personal and human aspects of an organization. When workers find meaning and fulfillment in their work, the organization benefits from their talent and energy – both are then successful. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In #7: In the article, organizations that used the Four Frame Model primarily used the human resource frame. It makes sense. Those in education inherently tend to focus on human needs and helping others. This should not have been an Aha but it was! #551Fall2019
Twitter Check In 5: The “real-world” case studies reflected more of an “unreal-world”. Rather than considering multiple perspectives, they leaned toward a single perspective and excluded the human aspect, which is real-world. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 4 – Integrating communication into the four frames allows leaders to act on the concepts of the four frames through communication. Their speech and language can influence outcomes of the organization. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 3 – The structural frame focuses on the construction of an organization and emphasizes roles, rules, and functions for work to be done and meet goals. With this frame, structure leads to clarity and efficiency. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 2 – Applying organizational theory to student cheating provides a non-traditional view to addressing the problem. Looking at an institution’s behavior from multiple perspectives can help understand student cheating and better respond to it. #551Fall2019
@Jess_hannigan Twitter Check In 1 - Reframing Organizations was written to illustrate how considering multiple perspectives can help managers and leaders better understand and respond to the demands of an organization. #551Fall2019