David

Tech expert

[David @ddasser]

@JeffVeillette @danwass The largest recorded flood in Toronto by river levels, peak flows, deaths, and overall devastation was on October 15–16, 1954. https://t.co/FIN9WQnhAq

[David @ddasser]

@Jaden_Hercules @RTNToronto The largest recorded flood in Toronto by river levels, peak flows, deaths, and overall devastation was on October 15–16, 1954. https://t.co/FIN9WQnhAq

[David @ddasser]

@NadavPollak It’s called “weather”. It’s happened many times before, will happen many times again.

[David @ddasser]

@algorithmanger @KanekoaTheGreat I want to hear his side of the story to be presented by the defense team at trial.

[David @ddasser]

@Australian_Hope It’s just the sort of panty made to be pulled down for a good spanking.

[David @ddasser]

Did he say that? Can wherever he supposedly said that be linked to him? If all they have is a screenshot of a Telegram chat, that could easily be faked. Ie anybody with his credentials could login and say that. If he denies it (and we don’t know if he will or not at this stage), then there’s that pesky reasonable doubt thing again.

[David @ddasser]

@algorithmanger @KanekoaTheGreat I have eyes. If they got several different people of similar build in similar clothes in a lineup, and asked me to pick out the person in the video, it would be next to impossible.

[David @ddasser]

@GmorganJr Why did you think you would be welcome at all? Why did you hide the fact of your involvement from her? Not cool.

[David @ddasser]

All the videos are blurry and nobody can positively ID him. The DNA on the gun is the most degraded of 5 different samples taken off it. They cannot even definitively tie the gun to the bullet fragment. There is no confession on record (only report of one). The “confession” was a screenshot of a back and forth with his bf, but nothing ties it to Robinson. It’s all circumstantial. He might have done it, but it doesn’t rise to “beyond a reasonable doubt” status. Bub.

[David @ddasser]

@algorithmanger @KanekoaTheGreat You seem to misunderstood how it all,works. Andrew made the assertion that the evidence was overwhelming. He could not back that up. There’s no proof the gun was used. There’s no proof he was even there. That came out pretty clearly. Andrew lost.

[David @ddasser]

@algorithmanger @KanekoaTheGreat The onus is on the prosecution to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Andrew presented nothing of the sort.

[David @ddasser]

@paleochristcon I understood your job was to demonstrate there was some sort of slam dunk evidence that TR did it. I didn’t see it from you. Plus too much unexplained stuff, which is all I think CO is saying.

[David @ddasser]

@RealCandaceO @Ebbalieberhund Well done, Candace.

[David @ddasser]

I do not qualify that way. I mean her points raise reasonable doubts for an open minded person.

There is no applicable legal definition of “compelling evidence” in the Utah preliminary hearing. The prosecution is charged with demonstrating a “reasonable belief” (which is far less than what is required at trial). Plus the judge has not yet ruled if even that was presented.

The thrust of Andrew’s point, regardless of precise words, was the sense that it is obvious, a slam dunk, compelling, beyond the shadow of a doubt, and so on. Candace demonstrates it’s far from that.

[David @ddasser]

@Cernovich Same. In my 60s now, calorie counting is an everyday thing else I start packing on fat, regardless of exercise.

[David @ddasser]

@D_Husker7 @afshinrattansi Similarly the USA gets no vote on whether Cuba hosts Russian nuclear missiles. Fair’s fair.

[David @ddasser]

@ntoxno @MarioNawfal Before the Jews the land was underdeveloped and poor. A vast influx of capital and energy came with the Zionist Jews even prior to WW2. Do your homework.

[David @ddasser]

@MarioNawfal There was no “Bucha massacre”. It was very obviously a false flag. Like, very, very obviously. Do your homework.

[David @ddasser]

@zellieimani Born in Canada. Father’s side came from Scotland. Mother’s side from Hungary. What’s your point?