@pobuelo2524@Stubbs_GunGuy@Mikesbikes7 Okay so this is *precedent*, not a direct court order to all future cops. The precedent is that cops are not required to follow court orders (under some circumstances). In the SC case, the cops did not follow a court order, thus proving my point.
@pobuelo2524@Stubbs_GunGuy@Mikesbikes7 Is your claim that police *cannot* refuse court orders (your original claim) or that police *can* refuse court orders (your new claim)?
@pobuelo2524@Stubbs_GunGuy@Mikesbikes7 I'm still confused why you think the example doesn't apply. Are you saying that it shows cops *are* allowed to refuse court orders, or that it doesn't?
@pobuelo2524@Stubbs_GunGuy@Mikesbikes7 *sigh* Yes, that is what a restraining order is. Or used to be.
You now have video, media reports, and Supreme Court precedent at your disposal. This is happening right now, in America. Best wishes.