Lee Miller

[Overton @overton_news]

Senator John Kennedy served up one of the most brutal ROASTS of Democrat Senate candidate Graham Platner.

The line that sold the two-minute comedy routine was calling him so extreme he makes AOC look like Aunt Bee in Mayberry.

KENNEDY: “Sean, Mr. Platner seems to be one of the new faces of the loon wing of the Democratic Party.”

“Clearly he’s angry. When I see him on TV, he always looks like he’s straining to have a stool.”

“His supporters say no, you don’t understand him. He’s just idiosyncratic. I guess he goose steps to the beat of his own drummer.”

“But his history shows there’s more than that.”

“I mean, this guy makes...he makes Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez look like Aunt Bee in Mayberry.”

“Mr. Platner’s comments about black people, his cavalier attitude towards r*pe, apparently his stated preference for masturbating in a porta-potty, his contempt for America.”

“I think at one point he implied he wished the Taliban were better shots to kill our people.”

“This is not normal. I mean, this guy is 10 exits past normal.”

“Then he says well, that was in my past. I’ve been born again. But just recently we found out through his wife that Mr. Platner has been sending sexually explicit messages, digital messages, to other women.”

“He calls it sexting.”

“He says oh, there’s nothing to see here. Well, Anthony wiener was sexting. We all said what is that about?”

“We found out he was sending pictures of his penis to young women.”

“Now, I’m not saying Mr. Platner is doing that. I don’t know. But he needs to release those text messages. I want to know if he’s a sexual predator!”

“I mean, the people of Maine deserve to know. This guy is...he’s like a Saturday Night Live skit!”

[Mike Netter @nettermike]

This article was written by a 26 yr old college student by the name of Alyssa Ahlgren, who's in grad school for her MBA. What a GREAT perspecitve..👍🏽

My Generation Is Blind to the Prosperity Around Us!
I'm sitting in a small coffee shop near Nokomis (Florida) trying to think of what to write about. I scroll through my newsfeed on my phone looking at the latest headlines of presidential candidates calling for policies to "fix" the so-called injustices of capitalism. I put my phone down and continue to look around.

I see people talking freely, working on their MacBook's, ordering food they get in an instant, seeing cars go by outside, and it dawned on me. We live in the most privileged time in the most prosperous nation and we've become completely blind to it.

Vehicles, food, technology, freedom to associate with whom we choose.These things are so ingrained in our American way of life we don't give them a second thought.

We are so well off here in the United States that our poverty line begins 31 times above the global average. Thirty One Times!!!

Virtually no one in the United States is considered poor by global standards. Yet, in a time where we can order a product off Amazon with one click and have it at our doorstep the next day, we are unappreciative, unsatisfied, and ungrateful. ??

Our unappreciation is evident as the popularity of socialist policies among my generation continues to grow. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently said to Newsweek talking about the millennial generation, "An entire generation, which is now becoming one of the largest electorates in America, came of age and never saw American prosperity."

Never saw American prosperity! Let that sink in.

When I first read that statement, I thought to myself, that was quite literally the most entitled and factually illiterate thing I've ever heard in my 26 years on this earth. Many young people agree with her, which is entirely misguided.

My generation is being indoctrinated by a mainstream narrative to actually believe we have never seen prosperity. I know this first hand, I went to college, let's just say I didn't have the popular opinion, but I digress.

Why then, with all of the overwhelming evidence around us, evidence that I can even see sitting at a coffee shop, do we not view this as prosperity? We have people who are dying to get into our country.

People around the world destitute and truly impoverished. Yet, we have a young generation convinced they've never seen prosperity, and as a result, we elect some politicians who are dead set on taking steps towards abolishing capitalism.

Why? The answer is this,?? my generation has only seen prosperity. We have no contrast. We didn't live in the great depression, or live through two world wars, the Korean War, The Vietnam War or we didn't see the rise and fall of socialism and communism.

We don't know what it's like to live without the internet, without cars, without smartphones. We don't have a lack of prosperity problem. We have an entitlement problem, an ungratefulness problem, and it's spreading like a plague."

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

🚨 BREAKING: NAZl superstar Graham Platner WINS the Maine Democratic U.S. Senate primary.

A reminder that Democrats are the NAZl Party.

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Mr. Platner,

Ratio.

That's it. That's the whole rebuttal.

You are someone who, by the virtue of his Reddit posts, manages to be simultaneously a filthy-literal-Communist and anti-Semite. That in itself is an egregious sin, because literal, card-carrying Communists are fundamentally at odds with America's norms.

But if that weren't enough, you have voluminous Reddit posts defending the Nazi Totenkopf symbol. You clearly knew the tattoo you got and you defended it publicly. There's no either/or way about it.

Scum attracts scum. Which is why you can comfortably swim in both literal-Communist and literal-antisemitic far-right circles.

I am no fan of Sue Collins. But the fact you are running against her, that you have even the smallest chance of defeating her --

you, as someone who is a self-admitted Communist, someone who has Nazi sympathies -- not to mention all the horrific, personal-life stuff --

You are the worst candidate in history, right AND left. You are the authoritarian evil that every "democracy" group speaks about, yet they will hypocritically not say a word against because they believe that being anti-Trump is more important than allying with Communists or Nazis.

You are not "populist." On the contrary:

You are the perfected example of how liberal democracy has rotted so far that they'd rather stay silent about you, hoping you'll win against the most moderate Republican in the Senate, than to hand Trump the possibility of retaining the Senate.

[Liz Wheeler @Liz_Wheeler]

“What’s the evidence of fraud?”

This is a trick question posed by Democrats.

Here’s the reality:

California does NOTHING to detect fraud.

So how would we see it?

It’s like a jewelry store being robbed, glass broken, diamonds stolen, but the idiot shop owners don’t have security cameras or an alarm.

So they don’t SEE how the crime was committed.

But they see the broken glass and their diamonds gone.

The entire election system in California is build EXACTLY for that purpose: To allow cheating and rigging but to hide HOW the crimes are committed.

You have no obligation to provide proof of fraud when California provides no proof of legitimacy.

The burden of proof is on them.

You have no obligation to trust a rigged system, and in fact would be naive to do so.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

California made it illegal to show or request photo ID to vote. You cannot show your photo ID even voluntarily!

[Kyle Becker @kylenabecker]

Let’s review. California:

- Made it illegal to show voter IDs
- Mass mail-in ballots across the state
- Allows people to print ballots at home
- Allows people to register anywhere in the state
- Allows ballot harvesting
- Allows people to register with “IDs” like gym memberships & insurance cards
- Allows people to hand-date ballot envelopes, no postmark required
- Has 853,000 + “ghost voters”
- Sanctuary state that harbors illegal aliens
- Refuses to turn over dirty voter rolls for verification
- Refuses to allow independent signature verification audit
- Refuses to allow ballot inspection audit

This isn’t exactly “subtle.” It’s a blueprint for stealing elections.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

Folks, we're dealing with a fraction of a percentage point difference, there's still hundreds of thousands of votes outstanding, and LA officials have given us the next 3 weeks to count! Let's git-r-dun!

[Brandon Tatum @TheOfficerTatum]

🚨 Weeks before the vote count flipped, Gavin Newsom warned about a potential “break the glass” scenario if Republicans gained too much ground in California.

Now Spencer Pratt has been passed by Nithya Raman in the race for second place after days of ballot counting… so what exactly did Gavin Newsom mean by that? 🤨

[Disgraced Propagandist @DisgracedProp]

Somebody else needs to help me do this with charts and graphs but I’ll try with words first.

- In a normal election, you have 2 candidates, R & L. People cast votes. Proportionally, the votes of each candidate rise and fall in little chunks but take an overall steady line due to the force of averages. One of the lines eventually tops out, and that candidate wins on election night.

- In a mail in election, you have 2 candidates R & L. In this instance, some mail ins (if allowed) may come in after Election Day. But still, due to the force of averages, their lines with have little ups and downs but maintain a steady upward trajectory both during and after the election until one wins.

Now it has become the norm that after the election in mail in states, Dem candidates tend to go from tied or losing to drastically ahead AFTER the election, against the force of averages. How?

There are two legal, non fraudulent explanations:

1) that “Dems vote late by mail.” Dubious, considering that it used to be that Rs were known as absentee voters, but technically possible that for some never explained reason, Ds vote later than Rs by mail and that explains the statistical anomaly of why Dems lines shoot up after Election Day.

2) ballot harvesting. The far more likely explanation. Legal in California, this is when huge amounts of ballots are collected by political activists (unions, NGOs etc) and submitted on behalf of large populations of people in churches, workplaces etc. Both sides do it, but it is technically possible that Dems are much better at it. This is how insiders explain the “red mirage” statistical anomalies in 2020 and that have become so common since. Also explains why the prediction markets clinched Raman as winning while she was still down.

However, there is something different happening in Pratt v Bass election. A third candidate, a second, much less popular and less well known Dem is in the race, Nithya Raman. And this time, the late mail in ballots—mailed on Election Day or just before which is why they are “late mail in”—didn’t go to “the dems” they went specifically to Nithya Raman. Pratt stayed flat. Bass stayed flat. Nithya went way up after the initial count was reported. Unprecedented.

Oddly, the mail in mailed any time before Election Day did not favor nithya at all. Only the late mail ins counted after initial numbers were reported massively favored her. So we’re meant to believe that Nithya voters specifically voted not just by mail by late by mail, while the other Dem and Pratt voters did not. Bass voters stopped voting late mail in entirely, as they had last election against caruso, and Nithya voters started?

Could it be “Dems vote late by mail?” No, because then both Nithya and Bass, both Dems, would have risen at roughly the same rate, only without Pratt. But nithya massively over performed just enough to oust pratt, which would not have been possible had she and bass split the votes.

Could it be ballot harvesting? Also no. You can harvest a church or workplace and predict roughly that your harvested votes will favor Dems, but how could you feasibly predict which Dem out of two? Nithya’s support, always squarely in third place during the polls, is mostly educated white women, definitely not the type to vote late or be harvested. But that’s actually besides the point. How could a vote harvester, who is supposedly delivering filled out and sealed ballots from a constituency the harvester believes will lean left, know which left wing candidate this or that batch favors? And moreover, why would they then send only those batches after the election, while submitting all the other mail in ballots for bass before the election?

Occams Razor points to the much simpler explanation. Whoever is harvesting the votes isn’t just harvesting them, they’re somehow controlling the votes themselves, whether by filling them out or throwing away competing votes they don’t like. This is the definition of voter fraud.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

Mail-ins arriving before Election Day:
🔵 Bass: 38.1%
🔴 Pratt: 27.9%
🔵 Raman: 20%

Mail-ins arriving after Election Day:
🔵 Raman: 37% (+17% surge)
🔵 Bass: 34.9% (-3% drop)
🔴 Pratt: 19% (-9% drop)

Who are we kidding here? This is fraud.

[Shabbos Kestenbaum @ShabbosK]

Im sorry but President Trump is absolutely correct.

The way California conducts their elections is a legitimate, credible threat to democracy:

1. Ballot harvesting is LEGAL, meaning 3rd parties are allowed to deliver thousands of completed ballots themselves with ZERO supervision or timeline.

2. There is ZERO requirement to show ANY type of ID when one comes to vote.

3. There are thousands of UNATTENDED drop boxes for ballots. There are DOZENS of examples of them being lit on fire, stolen, or bombarded with fake ballots.

4. The homeless are regularly paid to vote. The are given illegitimate addresses and coached through the process.

5. About 13 million of the approximately 16 million votes cast in 2024 were cast using vote-by-mail ballots. However, mail-in ballots are sent to every registered voter, whether you request them or not. California almost never updates their voting rolls, so ballots are REGULARLY sent to people who no longer live in the state, wrong address, or different person. My building alone had half a dozen such cases.

6. India had 660 million voters last election and counted the vote in one day. California has about 16 million and counting takes at least 30 days. This is a national embarrassment.

[Derrick Evans @DerrickEvans4WV]

This is not mathematically or statistically realistic.

Mail in ballots for everyone drop except for the person they need to beat Spencer Pratt.

No way this is a coincidence. Then again, there are no consequences for the left stealing elections so I don’t blame them.

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

Make no mistake about it… What you are seeing in the California election will happen everywhere if Democrats ever take back the power in Washington DC.

They will make sure they never lose another election.

We have to pass the SAVE America Act or we are done.

[James Klüg @jamesklug]

Yeah I’ve seen enough. Hire him @ICEgov and give him a sign on bonus

[Lee Miller @deadwing7878]

@cnnbrk Guys, CNN called the democrats headquarters and asked if they were cheating. They answered, “No”
So there you have it.

[Lee Miller @deadwing7878]

@DschlopesIsBack @JohnABarnas lol, stat of the day !

[Lee Miller @deadwing7878]

@DschlopesIsBack The opposing team loves it when she starts throwing up bricks from three point range.

[Lee Miller @deadwing7878]

@Phantom2Phlyer Not only that, but “We’ve made illegal to investigate fraud”

[Lee Miller @deadwing7878]

Single Party Rule. It’s happened in California. They pass crazy laws like no reporting fraud and no questioning fraudulent mail in ballots. When they ever get control of congress and the presidency, this will serve as their blueprint for the entire country.