@Motox8521 In the number of negative texts from you. Man, you are an investor in the company that you complain about. f you are so unhappy in your investment in TWOH, then get out and move on.Clearly, long term investors in TWOH know your thoughts by now.mDaily bitching serves no purpose.
@Motox8521 When COB agreed to by CSE,and especially if additional partnerships are announced, we will see volume and rise in SP.Until then, we continue to wait. Likely most on the TWOH boards have fully invested.Some are still getting there.If COB occurs & no action ur compaints r justified
@Motox8521@Nautique220SA Gotcha. Hope you get your price. Believe that you will. I’m holding, and expect at least 3 cents. That will be my first sell point. Speculative, yes. Experienced team. They are laying the foundation to a successful company. We’ll see in the next year who was correct here.
@Motox8521@Nautique220SA You still havent answered my question: are you invested in TWOH? Or are you a noninvestor in TWOH just using your precious time telling tge World how bad a stock this is. Simple wuestions. Simple answers that you seem to be avoiding.
@Motox8521 If that is your belief, then why do you waste your time here? Are you invested in TWOH? If yes is the answer, why stay invested? If you are not invested, logic would dictate that your time is better spent researching “better” investments.
@Motox8521 Sounds like time for you to sell and not have to deal with this “stagnant” stock. However, you havent sold. Why? Perhaps you are fearful of missing out on a potential large gain.
@Motox8521 Then sell and move on, if you dont have the patience to wait for a strong move up, or dont believe it will. If you choose to hold, then stop with the daily rants. Although this is a speculative investment I believe that the odds favor those who are patient.
@TheMoneyApe All Trump did when negotiating s cease fire and negotiations was to allow Iran to re-arm with Russian and Chinese weapons. Negotiations with Iran is a waste of time. Time to overthrow the govt and establish a new one that drsires long term peace and stability in the region.
@johncumbers He tends to overstate the results of his treatments, and when more thoroughly researched, perhaps after the sale of the patent, to a large drug company, the treatment under-delivers. Before his claims are believable they must be replicated in other labs.
@drpablocorral At least from my review of the studies, attempting to determine absolute risk reduction, on a long term basis, the effects of statins are negligible, with low single digit (1 to 2%) protection.
@drpablocorral What were the ABSOLUTE percentreductions in nonfatal MI’s, fatal MI’s and deaths 5, 10, 15 and 20 years comparing the treatment and nontreatment groups?
@drpablocorral When you eliminate the telative risk data, thw impact of statins,on a long term basis, at least to me,is negligible.And in looking at the data in long term f/u in the WOSCOPS participants,you are only seeing a 1 to 2% reduction in events, again w/o any long term effect re stroke.
@drpablocorral Absolute risk reductions were not recorded. However, in reviewing the article, there was no risk reduction for heart failure and stroke. Additionalky looking at the parameters you described, talking in absolute terms, it appears tge number of events in each group were similar.
@Will52773T@joeroganhq Even in long term f/u the absolute reduction in MI and death, may be 2%. No long term protection for stroke (f/u from Wescot study. 4S study was poorly planned , drug company financed, and as a result overcalculated, positive effects.
@DrSiyabMD Show me a reference that demonstrates the absolute risk reduction for death/disability, over a ten, or twenty year period for statin users, for secondary prevention. Relative risk, and prediction studies are for the most part worthless. Show me tge same for primary prevention.