Now all these important, elite folks maybe understand what it feels like for a child in an American K-12 school thanks to our collective worship of a warped politicized interpretation of the plain language of the 2nd Amendment about the importance of maintaining a ready militia.
@JoanBiskupic Did you notice that no Justice asked about what provision of the Constitution gives President Trump (rather than Congress) the power to interpret the 14th Amendment usually reserved to the Court?
Multiple questions and answers addressed what Congress could do with its power to “enforce, by appropriate legislation” the provisions of the 14th Amendment including birthright citizenship.
Does this mean the Justices have likely already decided that the President does have such power from somewhere undiscussed, or that he does not -- and that the case is essentially over regardless of the arguments about what Congress could do?
Aren’t questions of separation of powers (which Kavanaugh briefly alluded to). pretty darn important to deciding on the Constitution legitimacy of an Executive Order?
@PaulaReidCNN Did you notice that no Justice asked about what provision of the Constitution give President Trump (rather than Conf gress0 the power to interpret the 14th Amendment usually reserved to the Court? Multiple questions and answers address addressed what Congress could do with its pro to “enforce, by appropriate legislation” the provisions of the 14th Amendment including birthright citizenship. Does this mean the Justices have already decided that the President does have such power from somewhere undiscussed, or that he does not and that the case is essentially, over regardless of the arguments about what Congress could do? Aren’t question of separation of powers (which Kavanaugh briefly alluded to, pretty darn important to deciding on the Constitution legitimacy of an Executive Order?
@jaketapper@kwelkernbc@margbrennan@andersoncooper@DavidMuir Re Birthright Citizenship: There was no Q&A at SCOTUS today on what part of the Constitution give the President power to interpret the 14th Amendment by Executive Order - the Justices asked only about what Congress can do. Does that mean they already agree with Trump's opponent that the Constitution's separation or powers means only Congress can do so, if at all?
Below is a link to my Substack column on the Court's immediately pending consideration of the case challenging President Trump's Executive Order purporting to limit 14th Amendment birthright citizenship for children of migrants and visa holders going forward. As always, I appreciate comments and critiques .. and all "subscriptions" are free of charge. Thanks very much for your interest. Terry
https://t.co/5JH9QrRtkR
WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE?, by @deantrc https://t.co/ZG49YxkAqu
@SaraEisen President Trump already has a press spokesperson...your ignorance of the US Constitution and law is showing: Congress only declares war and has made one exception for the President to take military action against "imminent" threats -- unless we are in Orwell-land, that means like "now." Even before that law was passed, FDR in 1941 had every reason to act militarily right after Pearl Harbor...but unlike Trump he chose to trust (and thus) trust the American people's representatives by going to Congress (which you seem to think is irrelevant now). Please just be careful opining on law you haven't studied -- your opinions matter and are usually more considered .
WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE?, by @deantrc https://t.co/KNVEZvd6Z7
WHEN IT COMES TO AMERICAN BUSINESS, TRUMP MEANS HIS BUSINESS. MEMO TO CEO'S -- JUST WHEN YOU THINK YOU'VE GOT HIM, HE'S GOT YOU!
@sharmancourt thanks for your great AP article: is it possible the Court has not issued an opinion on tariffs as yet because its having trouble "getting to five" ?? @lwhitehurst
@sherancourt @lwhitehurst thanks for your great AP article: is it possible the Court has not issued an opinion on tariffs as yet because its having trouble "getting to five" ??
@sherancourt @lwhitehurst thanks for your great AP article: is it possible the Court has not issued an opinion on tariffs as yet because its having trouble "getting to five" ??
@KellyEvansCNBC@ScottWapner both Zervos and Bessent are wrong about Powell attending the SCOTUS hearing on attempted COOK firing-- Powell; is a named party (by the Government) in the lawsuit: they are really saying a party to the lawsuit should not choose to attend?
@MelissaLeeCNBC What if the jobs reports for Sept, Oct and Nov -- IF they come out before the Fed's December meeting -- show a big fat zero growth, with unemployment at 4.5% or higher? Then would the Fed cut in Dec? Market senses jobs picture worse than Fed sees..traders have college grad kids who can't find work...
@NotSVPespn Nice halftime but fastest minute wrongest minute Rams are NOT 1st in NFC WEST Niners are + you ignore Run CMC's 200+ total yards 2TD performance for the win, as usual>
@DouthatNYT re your newsletter comment that Trump's expression of hate for his opponent in front of Charlie Kirk's grieving widow: IMHO it was not "funny in a Trumpian Way" -- any more than Jimmy Kimmell's comments that offended so many...But I agree with you that Trump spoke the truth about his hate -- yet Charlie Kirk put that i unChristian fact aside and enabled his Presidency -- probably put him over the top. Kirk said some hateful things, too (black women lack sugffienct mental capacity, MLK was an awful person.... and in a neat rhetorical trick, marketed "Prove me Wrong" as evidence of his bravery, good-heartedness and support of unfettered free speech. But his phrasing is in fact a subtle and too-clever way of shifting the BURDEN of PROOF in any debate to whoever dares disagree with Charlie Kirk. Nice work if you can get it. His assassination is rightly considered clear evidence of evil in this world. But there are other evils -- including his view that some number of innocent children's deaths are an acceptable price to preserve the Second Amendment (as he defines its meaning). As a Christian, I beg to disagree: prove me wrong?
@jaketapper@jimcramer@SaraEisen@kwelkernbc@margbrennan@DanaBashCNN Let me get this straight: Trump said BLS head "faked" job report last fall to help Harris get elected. FACT: The last job report before the election issued in October 2024 showed job growth of only 12,000, and revised the figures for the prior two months downward significantly! (Sort of like what Trump is complaining happened to "him" today!)One of the more blatantly incoherent conspiracy theories of all time. As always, believe Trump at your peril.
@jimcramer Powell has seen and raised on Trump with his "we're being nice not raising rates with the tariffs" comment. Just what the Chair needs to do to make sure they CAN lower rates in Sept without looking like Trump toadies. Strong move to the hoop, Jay! @guyadami@steveliesman