@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank I clearly stated the specific articles from the constitution that protects rights of minorities and since hindus aren't a minority that is why the HRCE exist for hindu temples
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank Under Articles 26, 29, and 30 of the Indian Constitution, religious and linguistic minorities were given explicit rights to establish and manage their own institutions to prevent them from being overwhelmed or absorbed by the majority population.
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank The 1986 Act ensured vital stability during an intense national crisis. It struck a balance between preserving minority religious autonomy and securing long-term financial maintenance for divorced women through state Waqf boards.2/2
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank secularism means protecting India's beautiful, diverse mosaic. Forced uniformity erases the distinct tribal customs, regional traditions, and personal laws of hundreds of communities. Reform must come from within, not via majoritarian diktat. 1/2
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank Atleast they used the money for the people not like bjp that took the money from ram mandir and kept it to themselves
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank See accountability is not something that bjp has any right to talk about because in the past 12 years they haven't taken any accountability
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank these measures were implemented to curb financial corruption by hereditary priests, streamline administration, ensure public access, and eliminate caste-based discrimination inside temple premises.
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank The P.V. Narasimha Rao-led Congress government passed the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991.5/5 and also congress led govt has created several autonomous shrine board including Vaishno Devi Shrine Board (1986) and others so tell me which was actually anti hindu
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank Historically, successive Congress central and state governments consistently approved and executed massive public funding and security apparatuses for mega-events like the Kumbh Mela and the Amarnath Yatra.
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank In 1986,Under the Prime Ministership of Rajiv Gandhi, the local administration permitted the opening of the locks of the disputed structure in Ayodhya, allowing Hindu devotees to perform puja at the site.
@Sanatan85404@JagadeeshPuttam@mr_mayank In 1989,The Rajiv Gandhi government subsequently permitted the Shilanyas (foundation stone laying ceremony) for the proposed Ram Temple at a site adjacent to the disputed structure.