deathkitty8

Co-Host of the Smoke-N-Sass Cast | Co-Host on Crossroads Reactions (Not HBR )| #christisking #trumpisourpresident🇺🇸 #creeksquad #researcher #truehistory

[Gabe Woolley @GabeGwoolley]

The Broken Arrow City Council voted down the development for the Islamic mosque tonight.

I am appreciative to all of my constituents, and the Oklahomans that showed up to express their concerns and exercise their constitutional rights.

[Declaration of Memes @LibertyCappy]

How did Hollywood actually produce a banger this good?

🤯

[The Oklahoma Lion @TheOklahomaLion]

BREAKING:

OK HJR1040 (2026) progresses.

A senate author for Rep. Woolley’s legislation to ban Sharia Law in Oklahoma has been confirmed.

Every bill must have a house & senate author to receive a hearing in committee.

More information to come Monday, once the senator files.

[Gabe Woolley @GabeGwoolley]

What do we think The Oklahoman means by “ultra-conservative”?

Maybe the idea that men can’t become women or that parents are the experts when it comes to their children, not the government?

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: THE FBI JUST SHUT DOWN ANOTHER ISLAMIC TERROR PLOT FOR NEW YEAR’S EVE IN TEXAS

A 21-year-old Texas man has been federally charged after allegedly sending bomb components and cryptocurrency to people he believed were acting for ISIS.

Authorities say he shared ISIS propaganda and attempted to deliver materials intended for explosive devices.

The DOJ says the plot was stopped before it could turn deadly.

FBI Director Patel:

“The subject allegedly shared ISIS propaganda, sent cryptocurrency believing it would fund terrorist activity, and attempted to deliver materials intended for explosive devices.

This is radical Islamic terrorism, and it was identified and stopped.”

Source: @bennyjohnson

[Gabe Woolley @GabeGwoolley]

Rep. Gabe Woolley Files HJR 1037 to Restore Voter Accountability Over Publicly Funded Universities

OKLAHOMA CITY — Oklahoma State Representative Gabe Woolley has filed Oklahoma House Joint Resolution 1037 (2026), a proposed constitutional amendment designed to restore accountability and public oversight of Oklahoma’s publicly funded universities by returning authority to the people through their elected representatives and a direct vote of Oklahoma citizens.

“Our government is supposed to be subject to the will of the people. That means we have taxation with representation,” Woolley said. “The people of Oklahoma can hold publicly funded universities accountable via their state-elected officials if Oklahoma House Joint Resolution 1037 passes the State House and the State Senate and is then placed before the voters of Oklahoma.”

House Joint Resolution 1037 follows the constitutional process required to amend the Oklahoma Constitution. The resolution must first receive approval by a majority vote of both the Oklahoma House of Representatives and the Oklahoma State Senate. Once approved by both legislative chambers, the measure is placed on a statewide ballot, allowing the people of Oklahoma to vote directly on whether to amend their Constitution.

“This is simply putting the power back into the hands of the people via our representative constitutional republic,” Woolley said. “We have seen too many political agendas that go against Oklahomans’ beliefs take place in our universities. If this legislation passes the Legislature and is approved by voters, the people will have control of their tax dollars and publicly funded education systems once again.”

Woolley also emphasized the far-reaching cultural impact of higher education on everyday life in Oklahoma.

“Graduates from our public universities go out into society and shape culture, workplaces, classrooms, and institutions that every single Oklahoman encounters,” Woolley said. “That is why it matters what is being taught. We want to make sure science, reality, and truth are promoted in our higher education institutions—because what happens in our universities doesn’t stay there. It affects all of us.”

New Accountability Mechanism

If HJR 1037 is approved by voters and the Oklahoma Constitution is amended, the measure would give the state Legislature authority to freeze up to 100% of a publicly funded university’s state funding for up to two years if the institution violates a law or engages in inappropriate misconduct.

Importantly, the measure also allows the Legislature to vote to unfreeze the funding if the issue at a publicly funded university or college is resolved, ensuring flexibility and fairness in enforcement.

Additionally, the measure allows Oklahomans to directly advocate for how their tax dollars are being used in higher education. Citizens could contact their state representatives and state senators to influence university funding decisions, policies, and priorities, ensuring public universities remain accountable to the people who fund them.

If approved by a majority of voters statewide, House Joint Resolution 1037 would formally amend the Oklahoma Constitution, reinforcing transparency, accountability, and public oversight of taxpayer-funded higher education.

[deathkitty8 @deathkittyy8]

@FrostyofTroy @GabeGwoolley And taxpayers are sick of paying for “pretty/city” things when we didn’t even want such things. We just want the choice. And to take care of our families & other Okies who are in TRUE need -ie homeless vets.

That is not the only way for economic growth, nor will it “kill jobs”

[Jake Merrick @JakeMerrick4Gov]

Did you know this about our state constitution?

[deathkitty8 @deathkittyy8]

@AmericaPapaBear Those who already stopped paying taxes:

[deathkitty8 @deathkittyy8]

@rc_yup @JellyRoll615 Agreed. I was way wrong about this

[CRIXUS @CRIXUSwasHERE]

WHO ELSE?👇🔥🔥🔥

[Cbvheartland @Cbvheartland2]

Good morning from SE Oklahoma the place Garth Brooks rejected as a place to raise his Children, we have a Plane,
a Flopping Flag and as always a Rooster this morning .

[U.S. Department of Labor @USDOL]

Let Earth Receive Her King.

[Gabe Woolley @GabeGwoolley]

Oklahoma,

When I first took office last year, you made it clear that you did not want the CCP’s influence in our state or our nation. This was a top concern for constituents and Oklahomans alike.

In response to your concerns, we brought experts to Oklahoma to further educate us on the reality of communism in America, and I ran legislation to help address these concerns.

This year, I have been hearing your concerns about the growth of Islam in America.

Stay tuned. In the coming weeks, we will be bringing you information and an event focused on strategy and the realities behind this issue.

- Oklahoma State Representative,
Gabe Woolley
————————————-

“Islam is not compatible with western civilization.”

- Charlie Kirk

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

250 years ago, our freedom was wrested from the hands of tyranny, & our people courageously united as one Nation under God. 

Today, we celebrate the ratification of our Bill of Rights, the document that enshrines in law the principles of freedom, human dignity, & due process.

[Declaration of Memes @LibertyCappy]

Yukon Cornelius was BASED

😎

[The General @GeneralMCNews]

BREAKING: President Trump says the United States will retaliate against ISIS following the killing of U.S. troops in Syria.

[The Real Mike Rowe @mikeroweworks]

https://t.co/910OiQtoTj
An Inconvenient Study

Last month, all hell broke loose on this normally tranquil slice of the Internet, when I shared a podcast episode with Gavin de Becker. Gavin is a famous criminologist who published a book called Forbidden Facts, which argued that many of the 72 childhood vaccines on the current schedule were either not necessary, or not worth the risk of taking. The book also claims the government knows all of this and has deliberately suppressed the truth.

Along with the typical accusations of “anti-vaxer!” and “conspiracy nut,” most of the comments critical of Gavin, (and me) were posted by people who had neither read Gavin’s book, nor listened to our conversation. So certain were the defenders of “safe and effective,” they couldn’t even take a quick look at what was actually being suggested before proclaiming “the science has been settled!!!” Well, I suspect the same thing will happen again today. Because today, at the request of many listeners, my guest is @delbigtree, CEO of Informed Consent Action Network. His recent film, An Inconvenient Study, is ruffling a lot of feathers.

The study in question was conducted by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases at The Henry Ford Medical Center. In short, this was the first major study to compare the overall health of thousands of people who received all of the recommended vaccines, with the overall health of those who did not. Most importantly, Dr. Zervos, a longtime proponent of vaccines (including all those on the current schedule) assured Del Bigtree that he would publish the results no matter what those results indicated. However, when the study was finally completed, Dr. Zervos changed his mind. Why? Because the results clearly contradicted the claims that the vaccines in question were safe and effective. And Dr. Zervos was afraid that releasing the results would cost him his job, and his reputation.

Obviously, Del Bigtree was very disappointed. Here at last was a very robust study conducted by a respected vaccine advocate at a renowned medical institution that cast serious doubt on the efficacy of certain vaccines. And so, Del went to meet with Dr. Zervos in person and pled with him to keep his word and publish the results. But, because he was not optimistic the Dr. Zavros would agree to do so, Del Bigtree surreptitiously filmed and recorded their entire conversation, over lunch. Consequently, Del Bigtree now has Dr. Zervos, (spoiler alert!) admitting - on camera - that even though he believed the results of his study were valid, he was unwilling to publish the results for fear of losing his job and his reputation in the medical community.

Obviously, my conversation with Del includes a discussion on the ethics of recording someone without their knowledge. We also discuss the methodology of the study itself, which has been criticized by a number of experts. Those criticisms are clearly stated and rebutted on the website where you can watch the film for free, linked below. But even if some experts question certain aspects of the underlying methodology, the results are impossible to ignore. If nothing else, they suggest an urgent need to conduct further studies with even larger groups and even better controls. The stakes are simply too high to shout down the skeptics with the usual “that’s all been debunked” routine, and the skeptics are now far too numerous to be dismissed as “anti-vaxxers.”

To that point, consider that just a few days ago, The Atlantic – arguably the strongest supporter of all recommended vaccines, (including and especially the Covid shots,) and the most consistent critic of anyone who suggested otherwise, finally admitted in a stunning headline that some children “may have died” because of them. https://t.co/yBza4gi2n7

There is no apology in the article, and zero empathy for the parents of the dead children. The author makes more of a “collateral damage” argument and concludes that the decision to deliberately conceal the attendant risk of injecting children with an unproven vaccine was a “strategic blunder” in the fight against “anti-vaxxers,” as opposed to a moral failing.

Nevertheless, it’s a remarkable reversal for a publication like The Atlantic, and no doubt gratifying to Gavin de Becker, Del Bigtree, and everyone else who has ever been shouted down for daring to wonder if we were being told the whole truth. Clearly, we weren’t.

An Inconvenient Study can be seen for free, here. https://t.co/avww8T3C2B
Likewise, my conversation with Del is also free, and can be listened to at your convenience.
https://t.co/a9vD6fSO7S

Both are worth your time.

Mike
PS. In response to the criticism sure to follow this conversation, I want to say, again, that my ultimate goal in talking to skeptics like Gavin de Becker and Del Bigtree is not to foster distrust in our institutions; it’s to push our institutions to admit when they’re wrong, and then, be accountable for those mistakes. Like most of you, I want to trust the experts. I want to believe our elected officials, our journalists, and most of all, our scientists. I want to believe they will always follow the facts, no matter where they lead. Unfortunately, experts are human beings, just like the rest of us. Some are more virtuous than others, but none are anxious to destroy their livelihoods and their reputations. Personally, I think it’s really important for the public to understand the pressure on experts like Marcus Zavros, and where that pressure comes from. That’s why books like Gavin’s and films like Del’s are important. Even if they are inconvenient...

https://t.co/910OiQtoTj

[deathkitty8 @deathkittyy8]

@RedneckRoadTech I trust my dog with my life too 💯

[deathkitty8 @deathkittyy8]

@RedneckRoadTech @grok and @DartNode