Before England’s goal in minute 45+2 against Norway, the sensor in the Connected Ball showed no peak in the 'heartbeat of the ball' when in the air, and therefore no evidence that the ball touched the overhead wire and changed the movement of the ball.
"We didn't lose to Portugal, we lost to biased refereeing....I have played football all my life and never have I imagined a strand of hair touching the ball could determine if a team stays in the world cup or not"
- Luka Modric
@_common_W_ Really? this is too low after Croatia game. Worst rob Ive ever seen in Sports! And Im an NFL fan! FIFA is way worst. This is the World Cup. We need better management than FIFA for that event.
@fifamedia@adidasfootball@FIFAWorldCup Regardless of that explain how you, the ref and VAR determined that Vega's touch was unintentional? He clearly tried to clear and made a mistake while trying to clear which means that it is ONSIDE
Just admit you are CORRUPT and you are doing everything to hand Ronaldo a WC
@fifamedia@adidasfootball@FIFAWorldCup Why is it that the ball’s microchip clearly marks the Croatian attacker’s header, yet in the continuous footage, there’s no visible impact on the Portuguese defender?
Can you explain this FCKER?
@fifamedia@adidasfootball@FIFAWorldCup cant beat common sense. This event doesnt have what the "rule is about". Just rubbing cheap graphics is not prove.