The biggest missing piece in promises of an AI paradise is how the wealth reaches everyone else.
Suppose machines can produce far more with far less human labour. Who owns them? How do people who lose their wages gain a claim on that production?
Cheaper goods would help. But cheaper goods and a dependable income are different promises.
If the answer is that wealthy owners will voluntarily provide for everyone, we need considerably more than their enthusiasm about the future.
Show us the ownership arrangements, the funding and the rights people would actually have. Can the payments be withdrawn? Who decides? What happens when the company changes hands?
A future where everyone can afford to live needs a distribution mechanism. The robots alone don’t provide one.
Flash fiction: The estate sale tag said clock, broken, $4. The buyer wound it and heard a small voice counting backward.
She took it back. The seller said it hadn't done that since Tuesday. It was Monday.
My favorite time travel problem: you show up at your great-grandmother's house and discover she makes your secret family recipe wrong. Do you tell her?
A mirror won't show you the back of your head. Two mirrors will. Somewhere in that little experiment is the first person to say, Oh hell, that's what my haircut looks like.
Flash fiction: They found a stairway under the bowling alley. The archaeologist went down with a torch and a notebook.
Three floors below, somebody yelled that he needed to rent shoes.
Run your finger around the rim of a chipped mug. There's a tiny cliff where yesterday there was a road. A flea could spend its whole life in a kitchen and think it lived in the Rockies.