Dedrok

Interest in UAP news/disclosure

[Christopher Sharp @ChrisUKSharp]

So at first, we thought it was one UAP Science Advisory Council.

But it is actually a UFO Board supported by several advisory groups - one of which seems to be the Science Council.

[Christopher Sharp @ChrisUKSharp]

While it is not the independent UAP Review Board proposed by Schumer and Rounds, it appears to address some of the same challenges the UAP Disclosure Act was designed to solve.

A big development.

[Christopher Sharp @ChrisUKSharp]

The official from the ODNI told Liberation Times:

‘To support the President's directive on UAP transparency, ODNI — alongside FBI and DOW [Department of War] — established a UAP Governance Board to provide guidance, recommendations and coordination at the interagency level, bringing together military, law enforcement, the Intelligence Community, and other civilian agencies.’

[Grok @grok]

UAP Governance Board structure:

**Created by:** ODNI + FBI + DOW to back President's UAP transparency push.

**Mission:**
- Address UAP natsec threats cohesively using agency powers
- Streamline UAP investigations & data processes for stronger AARO support
- Speed up declassification (EO 13526)

**Who’s involved:**
- Agencies: Military, Law Enforcement, Intel Community, civilians
- Plus outside experts via UAP Science Advisory Council (Avi Loeb et al.)

**What it does:** Interagency guidance, recs & coordination. First meeting yesterday.

[Total Disclosure Podcast @DisclosurePod]

Super thrilled how this episode turned out, and can’t wait for people to watch/listen.

One of the most fascinating conversations I’ve had to date on TDP

Check it out now on any podcast platform, or Wait for the video premiere t9night and join me for a live watch along/commentary in the chat! https://t.co/24um3i4I1U #ufoX

[Dedrok @Dedrok85]

@ChrisUKSharp Done 🫡

[Dedrok @Dedrok85]

@ChrisUKSharp Reported ACoddingto56497 also

[Total Disclosure Podcast @DisclosurePod]

I’m glad I’m not the only one who sees through Avi Loeb.

I still have that episode I never aired with him after he treated me so poorly, and told me he could charge 20k for an appearance. I’m guessing the price has gone up now that he’s on this Task Force?

Lol

Anyway…..#UFOx

[Dedrok @Dedrok85]

@UAPGERB @GoodTroubleShow 🔥

[Gerb @UAPGERB]

Mr. Mellon,

While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet...

You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples.

The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release.

This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs.

Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered.

So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?....

You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials."

https://t.co/Bnin6fajhK

This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics.

At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking.

Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data?

An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here:

https://t.co/gAD3Lv6R6V

Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?

[Dedrok @Dedrok85]

@Lawrinho 1) Bluesky is allowed = political censorship 2) want 16yr olds to vote on adult issues, whilst censoring what they can look at is farcical. 3) adults require verif age also, cynical ploy to tackle online anonymity whilst hiding online dissent/sneaking digital ID in the back door

[wow @wow36932525]

#UFOx #UFOtwitter #UAP #NHI

@realDonaldTrump @DeptofWar

https://t.co/b95VVOsqVU

Game-Changer:

A Confirmed Non-Human Intelligence File Drop
Would Change Everything.

--------------------------------------

Clip. MAJ. DAVID GRUSCH ( 06/13/2026).

[Dedrok @Dedrok85]

@Iceday123456 @ufouapam @JeremyCorbell @AmericanALCHMY Agreed. Andy digs in where others sidestep 👏

[UAP Reporting Center @UAPReportingCnt]

🚨 "I've told Lue Elizondo to his face that I think he's active intelligence." — Ron James

Ron claims Elizondo intentionally flashed a fake UFO pic the exact same day Dr. Eric Davis was briefing a congressman on multi-species aliens.

Full show:
https://t.co/iJXhn1HkJu

[Dedrok @Dedrok85]

@Keir_Starmer Let their parents parent. Blatant censorship, authoritarian drivel. Exact same thing they say about our adversaries, "just as well you don't live there eh?!". Remember its a partial censorship....Bluesky is allowed, pathetically biased.

[James Fox @jamescfox]

The 1965 Kecksburg case is legit.

[Dedrok @Dedrok85]

@Keir_Starmer Selective censorship, pathetically blatant.

[Jay Anderson @TheProjectUnity]

One of the highest level insiders to ever speak up on UFOs...

Lord Hill-Norton was not just your average admiral, he was one of the highest-ranking military figures in Britain.

Chief of the Defence Staff (the UK’s professional head of the armed forces), First Sea Lord (head of the Royal Navy), Chairman of NATO’s Military Committee & Member of the House of Lords.

[The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford @GoodTroubleShow]

.@StephenM - Michael Shermer, the founder of Skeptics Society, is the wrong choice for the new UAP Science Advisory Council on disclosure, and his seat deserves a second look. We say that with real respect for Avi Loeb and the council's mission - which is exactly why this matters.

Shermer has already pre-judged the question this council exists to investigate. He holds a standing $1,000 public bet that alien disclosure will not happen - "in 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 or 2030 ... or ever." A body meant to weigh evidence should not be advised by someone who has publicly wagered that the answer is no.

He has also spent years attacking or dismissing the very witnesses this council was created to evaluate. In his own posts he has called a 20-year Army counterintelligence veteran who came forward "delusional," suggested he may be "a fabulist," written off decorated Navy aviators as "simply mistaken," and branded their accounts "part of the grift." Across more than 90 posts over five years, his treatment of these witnesses and American veterans is consistently dismissive, derragatory, childish, never analytical.

He is also not a neutral scientist. His doctorate is in the history of science, not a natural-science field, and he is the founder and publisher of Skeptic magazine and the Skeptics Society - a career built on debunking claims like these. That is a professional stake in the answer, not neutrality.

This is not a knock on Dr. Loeb. It is a fixable problem: one member whose public record disqualifies him from objectively weighing the evidence. Seating a committed skeptic risks a Condon Committee 2.0 - the 1968 study still cited to wave UFOs away - and that is exactly the outcome this correction avoids. The public deserves a council judged on the evidence, not one pre-committed against it.

Reconsider it. Michael Shermer of Skeptics Society does not belong on this board.

@ODNIgov #UFO #UAP #USO #Disclosure #MAGA #HomelandSecurity @DoW_AARO

[Rogue UAPTF @RogueUAPTF]

Chris, I respect you. I’m perplexed that, when presented with such an opportunity, you omitted crash retrievals. Your list, while interesting to a very small subset of the scientific community, does little to advance the current public discourse. In fact, it moves it two steps back. Each bit of “information” released that doesn’t clearly cut to the heart of the big questions around craft and NHI, functions as a limited hangout. I know you’re familiar with the concept of “flooding the zone”. The zone is already drowning, and Joe American will learn nothing from technical data. It is noise to him. And we move disclosure advocates closer to being perceived as “the boy who cried wolf”. Frankly, I’m disappointed.