Aliens are a product of (a) philosophy. The non-philosophical turns bodies into Bose-Einstein condensates and projects this network along the furthest gravitational waves of the universe.
If the first generation of spinal catastrophism speaks of bone structure, the second approximates production dynamics by writing about the proximity to nerve pinching.
@en_demic Again, I think its a matter of taste. He's fair on Heidegger, quite "harsh" on Lacan and yes takes shots at Derrida elsewhere but also admits his own vectorial debt to him. I think you should examine the anglo-academic politeness that influences you, and I say that as a friend.
@en_demic The question of its aggression is a matter of opinion. I think its rather tame in comparison to other french writers. What he's establishing is a more important point: how to "read" through a text, rather than read it directly, which has become even as of his day quite unitary.
Its subversion of the philosophical stoppage point is thus part of its necessary productivity, and is executed in a minimal manner to insure it withdraws from philosophical debate.
Whether or not Laruelle’s One is beholden to a philosophical operation ( in the form of the Derridean differance) is irrelevant. what is important is that it never settles into being completed by the wholistic or unitary nature of the philosophical.
On the way to the complete desolation of the human body, its absolute transcription into entanglement forces unhindered by gravity, is the entropic distance that the sentient planetary techno capital maps out for it
@bognamk protestantism? Prevalent in the way anglophones read text, collapsing all meaning to wyswyg. catholicism has a history of the double entendre.