As much as I want to get riled up over this, it's obvious that this individual, like many others, thinks libertarians are either schizo James Lindsay types or unserious "I want my gay trans neighbors to defend their fent farm with guns!" types and based their post off of that.
Libertarianism is a form of controlled opposition that exists to render the Right inept and rudderless. Its sole purpose is to crowd out any serious pushback that might actually endanger the Left’s monopoly on power.
The Left figured out decades ago how to neutralize it, which is why libertarians were permitted to continue pontificating without fear of cancelation or censorship.
The same cannot be said for the Dissident Right. Rand and Rothbard were not swept under the rug like Schmitt and de Maistre were for a reason.
Leftist "discussion" of economic policy:
What if we gave people free stuff?
What if we gave people MORE free stuff?
What if EVERYTHING was free?
What if things costing money was evil?
I can't believe I'm making an argument against a slop page but:
The issue is these people think of "growth" only as quantitative increase in finished good output and thus assume that this requires increasing the quantity of capital goods in the process of production, which will eventually be entirely depreciated (and thus be "unsustainable")
In a sense naïvely funneling more resources en masse is a type of growth (the Soviet Union is the best example of exploiting such) but “economic growth” can also be a result of reducing capital depreciation (that is to say, creating goods with a longer life-cycle and are generally more durable) cum increasing productivity, so we end up using less resources to produce more final goods and with less waste/depreciation. It might even be that we find a use for capital that has outlived its normal lifespan; people tend to refer to this with the term "recycling". (And this is not mentioning renewable resources)
All of these actions are consuming capital goods at a lower and less wasteful rate, and they are done with an increase in knowledge and technique, not a mere increase in brute resource allocation.
any "libertarian" that doesn't oppose the civil rights act is a larper at best. this is the bare minimum.
scratch that, it should be the bare minimum to being considered right wing at all.
@ShitpostRock2 north has stronger individuals, but south has phineas and ferb with technology from ultrakill, transformers, helldivers and fucking madness combat. as long as they're on vacation, south clears