Kojo

private figure #MUFC 👹

[Kojo @deepkojo]

“I was burning, and yet you came in blaming me for smelling like ashes”

[Kojo @deepkojo]

You benefited from 11 VAR errors, that's the biggest joke, Piers.

[Piers Morgan @piersmorgan]

This referee is a joke.
Decision after decision after decision going against us.

[Kojo @deepkojo]

You confuse annoying with massive!

[Oyiga Micheal @Nsukka_okpa]

The fact that the entire Premier League unites to pray on our downfall just shows how massive Arsenal truly is.
They hate us because they’re terrified of where this team is going.
Proud of the boys for getting to the final. We win together, we lose together.

We will be back.

[Kojo @deepkojo]

@filex1073856 @StatsGH I don’t think y'all would become overnight immigration officers if you had it better!

[. @Fimiye]

If you're proud of your Dad. Retweet this.

[Harry Maguire @HarryMaguire93]

That’s the way to finish a season 💥
3points, 3 goals and a clean sheet at the seaside ❤️

UP THE REDS 🔴

[Premier League @premierleague]

🏆 @EASPORTSFC Player of the Season Saturday
🌟 A goal and assist on Sunday

Bruno Fernandes is him 😤

[Manchester United @ManUtd]

Another one.

🏆 @B_Fernandes8

[Premier League @premierleague]

A record season 🤩

Bruno Fernandes picks up the Coca-Cola Playmaker award 🏆

[Bruno Fernandes @B_Fernandes8]

how can I assist you? ☕

[Shanmukh Art @ShanmukhSripada]

was it worth it? 👀 (check the replies)

[Kojo @deepkojo]

If it were that easy an arsenal player would’ve had that record

[WelBeast @WelBeast]

Congratulations Bruno Fernandes on your new assist record from set piece assists.

[Premier League @premierleague]

In a league of his own.

Bruno Fernandes breaks the record for the most assists in a Premier League season!

[Manchester United @ManUtd]

BRUNO FERNANDES. RECORD-BREAKER.

[HelicopterMan @LaryeaDerek]

Dear Honourable Minister,

With the greatest respect, I believe many of the concerns being raised by technology professionals are not about whether NITA has the legal authority to enforce the law. The concern is whether the law, in its current form and application, achieves the outcomes we seek as a country.

The fact that a law exists does not automatically mean it should be enforced without review, especially when the very stakeholders expected to drive innovation are raising legitimate concerns about its impact.

It is worth noting that some of these provisions have existed since 2008, while others have been introduced more recently. Yet successive governments, despite having the power to enforce them, exercised restraint. Perhaps they recognized the delicate balance between regulation and innovation, and the risk of imposing barriers on a young and growing technology ecosystem.

The technology sector is unlike many traditional industries. Today's startup founder could be tomorrow's employer of hundreds. Today's student developer could build the next Ghanaian unicorn. The challenge is ensuring that regulation protects consumers and national interests without discouraging experimentation, entrepreneurship, and growth.

Listening to the people who put you into office is not a sign of weakness. It is good governance.

If developers, cybersecurity professionals, startups, and industry leaders are overwhelmingly signaling that certain fees and compliance requirements may increase the cost of entry, stifle innovation, and create unnecessary barriers to growth, then that feedback deserves serious consideration.

Sanitizing the technology space is not simply about enforcing existing laws. It is also about having the courage to revisit laws that may no longer serve the realities of today's digital economy.

A law can be legal and still be problematic.
A regulation can be enforceable and still produce unintended consequences.

The request from many within the ecosystem is therefore not for lawlessness. It is for a pause, consultation, and urgent review of the fee structures and compliance requirements being introduced.

The goal should be to build a technology ecosystem that is secure, trusted, and well-regulated, while remaining accessible to young innovators, startups, and entrepreneurs who are trying to create value, jobs, and opportunities.

We all want a sane technology space.

The question is whether the path we are taking strengthens innovation or unintentionally suppresses it.

#WeAreAllLearning

[Bruno Fernandes @B_Fernandes8]

This is not mine. This is yours. This is ours.

From all the players, staff and everyone involved in the club, to you guys who supported us every single day of the season.

Grateful for your love and support ❤️

[Manchester United @ManUtd]

U N I T E D ❤️

[Manchester United @ManUtd]

Deserved.

[Manchester United @ManUtd]

Sir Matt Busby Player of the Year ✅
United Players' Player of the Year ✅
FWA Footballer of the Year ✅
Premier League Player of the Season ✅

That's our Bruno 🐐

[Manchester United @ManUtd]

It's official: Bruno Fernandes is the best player in the Premier League 👍

[Kojo @deepkojo]

These are the concerns the opposition party should be highlighting. This is clearly a Trojan horse that will particularly cripple start-ups.

[Hubert Tieku Esq @KwesiHubert]

I barely do this but I beg any Ghanaian to read the following write up by Chris-Vincent Agyapong. Bookmark, share etc cos wtf 😳

1/4
“Ghana's NITA Bill 2025: How a Government That Cannot Fix Potholes Wants to Certify Your Keyboard Strokes

There is a particular brand of Ghanaian governance that operates on a simple, well-rehearsed logic: identify the one sector in which ordinary young people, without connections, without family money, without a politician uncle are actually building something for themselves, and then erect a magnificent bureaucratic tollbooth right in the middle of it.

The National Information Technology Authority Bill, 2025 currently making its way through Ghana's legislative machinery with the quiet confidence of a document probably written by a majority of people who have never debugged a line of code in their lives is precisely that tollbooth. It is, in its 105 sections and accompanying Schedule, one of the most breathtaking exercises in regulatory overreach this country has produced in recent memory. And given our regulatory track record, that is genuinely saying something.

The ICT sector is the one industry where a boy from Ashaiman, or, like my friend from Pulima, Aliu Wahab, with a second-hand laptop and a YouTube tutorial, can compete with someone whose father went to Achimota. It is the one space where talent, not tribe; skill, not surname; output, not old-boy network, still carries meaningful weight. It is, bluntly, the only functioning meritocracy left in Ghana's economic life.

And our government, with the NITA Bill 2025 has decided that this is precisely the sector that requires the most elaborate regulatory architecture since the tale of Moses coming down from Sinai with the Ten Commandments.

The Absurdity of Section 46: Certifying Everyone, Everywhere, Always

Let us begin with what is, without competition, the most extraordinary provision in this bill. Section 46(1) states, in plain and unambiguous terms:

"A person shall not be appointed as an ICT professional in a public or private institution unless that person is certified by the Authority."

Read that again. Public or private.

This is not a provision that limits itself to government systems handling national security data. This is not a narrow carve-out for critical infrastructure. This is a provision that means the software developer at a startup in Osu, the data analyst at a logistics firm in Tema, the web designer freelancing from her bedroom in Kumasi, all of them, every single one must first obtain certification from a government authority before they can lawfully be employed.

Who dreamed this up? Under what theory of governance does it make sense for the government of Ghana which cannot consistently process a DVLA licence within six months, which spent years and hundreds of millions on a national identification system that still cannot talk to the health insurance database to position itself as the certifying gatekeeper for an entire profession across the entire economy?

And here is the delicious irony that the framers of this bill seem constitutionally incapable of perceiving: the government's own ICT record is the single most compelling argument against giving it certification authority over anyone. You do not hand the keys of the wine cellar to the person who has been drinking the wine.

Politicians: The One Profession That Needs Certification Most, and Gets It Least

Since we are on the subject of certification, let us pause to consider who in this country is not required to demonstrate any competence whatsoever before being handed consequential power over millions of lives.

Continued below