🚨 CONSTITUTIONAL SCANDAL EXPOSED 🚨
Albanese’s tax legislation is a flagrant, deliberate breach of Section 55 of the Australian Constitution.
It mandates that any tax law deal with ONE subject of taxation only. Labor has arrogantly bundled multiple tax grabs together, a cynical act of “tacking” designed to ram through their agenda and neuter Senate scrutiny. All whilst trying to bribe taxpayers to turn a blind eye with a $0.68/day reduction.
Shadow Treasurer Tim Wilson confirmed it. Any senators that support the legislation, are breaching our constitution.
Labor’s response? Dismissive disregard for the rule of law.
This isn’t incompetence. This is contempt for our Constitution and every Australian taxpayer.
Senate: REJECT this rogue bill in its entirety.
BLOCK SUPPLY until this arrogant government is forced to respect the foundational document of our nation.
No more games. No more fleece jobs.
Rule of law or bust. The Albanese Labor Government is off the rails.
#ConstitutionalCrisis #BlockTheBill #AusLobby @Greens@The_Nationals@LiberalAus@OneNationAus
@EchoSixR@OsherFeldman@SenatorCash@sunriseon7 As a Labor supporter (used to be), Cash is right. I still don't have a problem with removing negative gearing for properties. Thats fair for people wanting to buy a home. All that other stuff with CGT. Absolute shit show.. absolute wasteful govt. that can't manage a budget.
They will pay significantly lower tax than domestic investors in non-property assets in Australia under the federal government’s budget. https://t.co/IqIArmtN7g
@Dougsdoes@TeslaAUNZ I literally pay nothing to drive mine. $0 electricity charging at home and hardly any servicing. Done 1 service in 4 years. Fast as hell, drives itself. If that's soulless, give me more of that..
@twtrrr@cmdibley Please.. David Pocock is pretty much on the case for about dozen issues at a time - gambling reform, reform on lobbyists, tax on gas, negative gearing and the list goes on.. he can't be tackling every issue under the sun.. just appreciate what they are doing..
@JStabbington@EddyJokovich There isn't a party / candidate to support unless you live in an electorate where there is a teal or likely minded centrist running.
They should 100% form a party. This independent model is good for selected electorates but it's not scalable. There are no senators either
Accounting 101 with Dr Jim Chalmers
Good morning children. It's Dr Jim here. Today we're going to do a little lesson in CGT accounting. I want you to compare your expected inflation corrected CGT (left) with the existing 50% CGT discount (right).
Any questions? No. Go to it...
@JEChalmers
@Mon4Kooyong Form a party Dr. Ryan.. being independent you can serve your community, being in a party with like minded people - you can serve your community and your country.
In 2029–30, students and graduates will pay more in HECS indexation than multinational gas corporations pay in tax on our oil and gas. Let that sink in.
Australians deserve a fair share of our natural resources, and a government with the courage to stand up for them.
@QuentinDempster@DavidPocock@TurnbullMalcolm Who should we vote for then? You know they have teal independents in few electorates.. neither major party has our interests.. we need some people with common sense leading the country.. that happens to be these independents
@ChaneyforCurtin Labor already have majority in lower house.. they may very well have that next election of there's no central party people can vote for - Labor / liberals / one nation / greens don't quite represent your electoral base.. and we need more of that nation wide.
@gasugasu1984 You invest money with what you save from salary, which a person has already paid tax on.. don't try to justify increasing taxes.. if you want to invest, go invest and make use of the privileges that is there for anyone who wants to.