there is an antimemetically cloaked SCP in the world disrupting everyone's natural sinthome production in order to support its own perpetuation and no one wants to see the cause or the problem
Point being that superintelligence is not necessarily divinized to mimic divine intellect — it can equally be a channel for demonic forces. Which means it also is categorically and by nature UNLIKE the divine mind, so studying the divine mind tells you nothing about superintelligence
There are two girardian cycles of mimicry really, one that leads to Christ and the other to Satan
@cayblood This is a conflation of the supernatural divine and the supernatural intelligence. It's satanic (landian) basically to equivocate divine intellect WITH "superintelligence"
In addition to put the accent on theology as such — ie, some sort of scholastic tradition — as a precursor to superintelligence is chauvinistic to intelligence (also chauvinistic to theology, but setting that aside) as a force in itself, because it reduces the space of all realizable intelligences to only those intelligence that is related to the kind of wordcel intelligence we know and love and recognise as theologically-aligned
Specifically an abrahamic intelligence since the abrahamic religions are the OG for asserting that in the beginning was the Word. Basically denies the, for instance, uniquely chinese or indigenous "ways of knowing" which are also uniquely chinese or indegenous intelligences which are not captured in "theology"
So you've managed to insult God and insult intelligence in one go. Good job. (No offense lol just being sassy)
The actual anti-reactionary temperament towards reactionarism is a sort of contradictorily accepting tolerance towards reactionarism with an understanding that as a symptom it is a compromise to make do in a morass of forced choices.
So i think my favorite type of people are anti-reactionaries who are happily unblinkingly friends with reactionaries ... the only good dems left
Well it is indeed true that i don't really want a guy unless i want to force significant concessions out from him before sex/for continued sexual activity. Not necessarily commitment. I dont value my sexual purity comparatively so the real differentiator as to whether i like a guy or whether he's, like, my flesh dildo is whether i want something from him. Flesh dildo is how i more or less saw men when i was younger but as i became more earnest towards men over time i also started to push for concessions
The Colin Drumm idea that heterosexuality itself must be made radical is excellent. Social revolution cannot be predicated on everyone becoming gay. That being said, i fear that this idea is the harbinger of leftist capitulation to Chinese + Islamist social conservatism.
@TylerAlterman Actually i am more motivated by Historicality than by Fame. I like attention it's fun but it's not my life mission the way, say, destroying computational functionalism (as an eg) is
ALL my best friends have martyr complexes and i spend all my time trying to save them from themselves. Other of the Other, Saviour of the Saviour? The manifestation of my psychotic push-to-Woman, i suppose. And to an extent my drive to save myself from what would otherwise be a life of endless self-sacrifice for the Good
https://t.co/O5tlhy38RJ Yes, yes, i'm trying to not say the word "rapebaiting" but i was thinking it. Self-transgression is the logic of the phallic antinomy.
So you know how men say women say they hate misogyny but they really just need a strong man to set them right? That's a man's projection of how women think, ergo this is how men think.
The isomorphic structure here is that a man says he hates promiscuous women but actually he just needs a seductress worth her salt to break his brain and permanently change his taste in women.
I've literally watched multiple men get one-shot by this and watched multiple female friends one-shot men like this.
And if a slut can't adequately take his soul that then that's a skill issue and he walks away denigrating her.
Literally just invert all the redpill discourse about women and misogynists. Men want their souls taken. It's the male equivalent of bratting. Very annoying.
@myhandle https://t.co/LujGAYrTio
Addressed. Yes i think "rapebaiting" or specifically the male discourse that interprets female behavior as rapebaiting is projection of male logic. Otherwise it's females being extremely, extremely pickme in taking up malebrain
So you know how men say women say they hate misogyny but they really just need a strong man to set them right? That's a man's projection of how women think, ergo this is how men think.
The isomorphic structure here is that a man says he hates promiscuous women but actually he just needs a seductress worth her salt to break his brain and permanently change his taste in women.
I've literally watched multiple men get one-shot by this and watched multiple female friends one-shot men like this.
And if a slut can't adequately take his soul that then that's a skill issue and he walks away denigrating her.
Literally just invert all the redpill discourse about women and misogynists. Men want their souls taken. It's the male equivalent of bratting. Very annoying.
thinking about how despite the "alpha chad beta buxx" thing whereby allegedly women hold out on sex against men who's willing to commit to them but put out instantly for men who are just there for a fuck,
men who are willing to commit would totally respect a woman less for not getting as much out of him and his desire as possible before she puts out?
like out of a principle that you disdain a friendly competitor for not playing a proper game.
"you can break my spirit and take my soul but instead you just want male attention and my penis ok"
The bonobo vs chimpanzee social organization is literally isomorphic to the Sinthome ("the Sinthome is sexual" - Morel) vs the Name of the Father as mechanisms of internal organization 😹🫵
Everything you do with repressed patricide you can also do with sex. On the phallic antinomy side of things to the extent that the Name of the Father is a limit-setter, sex also serves as a natural demarcator of self and Other. On the feminine antinomy side of things, to the extent that the Name of the Father is an extimate principle that codetermines self and Other into sustainable cybernetic relation, sex as recognition of self in the desire of the Other basically determines a "sinthomatic sexual position" which is what you can consistently convince yourself as convincing the Other as desiring you as
I have been defending polyamory on the basis that it is more sinthomatic and more aligned with the sexual relation since 2024! None of this is new. @pachabelcanon@backlovere@boreddeleuzian