defiOrvexa

💎 Building knowledge in crypto and Web3 every day. Big believer in decentralization and digital ownership. 🌐

[defiOrvexa @defiOrvexa]

$COWDOGGY

[defiOrvexa @defiOrvexa]

migrate

[defiOrvexa @defiOrvexa]

cowgirl showed up

doggy stayed late

$COWDOGGY

[defiOrvexa @defiOrvexa]

Gr3kBbTh4ui95srQsJ24WknZ5JSgAF1NjY6Raw2Hpump

[defiOrvexa @defiOrvexa]

cowgirl met doggy

things got complicated

$COWDOGGY is coming soon

[Blockonomi @blockonomi]

🚨 SBI Holdings is joining forces with the Solana Foundation to build Japan’s on-chain finance market.

The plan covers yen stablecoins, tokenized bonds, real estate, cross-border settlement and AI-agent payments.

Could Japan become Asia’s next blockchain hub? 🇯🇵⚡

https://t.co/D3nvstl0wx

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

One thing I find striking in the discourse between AI 2040 and its detractors is that the two seem to be locked in to totally incompatible worldviews of how fast and how much of a big deal AI progress is:

* In AI 2040, every scenario sees superintelligence of some kind emerging by 2040, unless a herculean effort is made to completely stop it
* Detractors say things like "AI 2040 is naive about human coordination ability and a threat to freedom", but don't seem to see any naivety in assuming that the ASI transition will just go well by default, don't seem to see ASI itself as a massive power concentrator risk, and don't seem to feel fear of humanity's "hard power" dropping to zero if ASIs can do literally every task better than we can. This stance makes total sense in a "AI is normal technology" world, zero sense in a world where superintelligence is possible by 2030 and almost guaranteed by 2040

I think my beliefs are:

- If I was confident that (present-day-style) AI is normal technology, I would be in the detractor camp
- If I was confident that superintelligence is coming in 2030 by default, I would be closer to the AI 2040 camp - it's naive, but every other option is naive squared?

But my problem is that I feel great uncertainty and have no idea which of the two worlds (or some other third thing) we're living in?

Hence why I continue to be open-minded about slowdowns/pauses, but also I feel very uncomfortable with the "open source bad, the good outcome is the one where our guys have controlling global dominance" push coming from some major AI companies and intellectuals - in a "normal" world that's the sort of thing that triggers every political alarm bell at the same time.

A big reason why I have been advocating and trying my best to support the d/acc platform (rapid up-skilling in formal verification, cryptography, secure and open hardware, pandemic resistance and other defensive biotech, food and basic resource security, public epistemics, non-power-concentrating versions of physical security) is that these things are clearly worth doing in both worlds.

The 2040 plan is already much more open source friendly (even mandating it! yay). It also includes "mutually assured compute destruction" ideas which (if they work) effectively give one of 2-5 actors the ability to trigger a global compute winter - as opposed to giving 1-5 actors the ability to selectively disenfranchise people they consider baddies while exempting themselves. This is also a big improvement. So I can see the earnest attempts to improve along the dimensions detractors criticize on ("does this concentrate power in big AI labs and superpower governments?"), and I appreciate this. I think many people don't appreciate enough the differences between different "kinds" of pause buttons, and how some concentrate power far more than others. Probably we can think harder and improve even more here.

But on the "slowdown/pause or not" topic, there isn't a magic "escape the tradeoff" button.

The Hansonian in me says: the winning deal is a deal which, from the perspective of both sides' present-day beliefs and knowledge, both sides would accept, though for different reasons. If the crux is AI progress speed, then identify a set of pre-agreed triggers for "okay, serious shit is happening" [super-pandemics? >25% unemployment? something involving slaughterbots?], and pre-agree that we become much more open-minded to the slowdown or pause thing if enough triggers come to pass within some timeframe. 2040 detractors (who clearly implicitly think that we'll see amazing speedup of progress from AI but think that what I call the "serious shit" category is overhyped) will accept expecting that the triggers don't come to pass, and AI worriers will accept expecting that they will. Pre-agreeing on the specific triggers means that once the triggers either hit or don't hit, there is stronger legitimacy around the idea that one side's worldview turned out more correct and we should be more inclined toward their program.

If I were @elonmusk (or zuck, or...) I would re-tool twitter much more heavily into being a platform for helping to identify and make these kinds of grand win-win deals, so that we can bypass big-country governments and big-company CEOs and big nonprofit intellectuals and give more people a voice in the discussion. It's possibly one of the best things that social media _could_ do for humanity if it wanted to.

But again, maybe this is also naive. Actually, probably it's naive.

But currently, I see zero plans for how to deal with an ASI transition that are not naive. Perhaps humanity is stuck with a choice between naive and naive squared (or maybe even naive squared and naive cubed), so I feel inclined to cut some slack to people who are trying.

[Chainlink @chainlink]

"World will establish themselves as the de facto prediction market within the Solana ecosystem."

@ChainlinkWill on @therollupco 🔊

[CoinDesk @CoinDesk]

Binance is shifting its growth strategy from pure crypto trading toward becoming a payments-focused “super app” offering broader financial services.

Read the full story by Olivier Acuna on CoinDesk

[BitMart @BitMartExchange]

💰BTC Bargain Hunt | Unlock Your Low-Cost BTC Opportunity!

🧐Looking for the right time to buy BTC? Now is your chance! 🎯

🎁Complete tasks to collect mystery boxes and unlock exclusive BTC rewards. Hunt for BTC deals and capture the market opportunity today!

✨ Limited mystery boxes available — start your BTC bargain hunt now!

Join Now: https://t.co/r3jP0PQbRI

[Blockonomi @blockonomi]

Mizuho just downgraded $CRCL to Underperform, slashing its price target from $85 to $50.

The reason? OpenUSD's revenue model could squeeze Circle's margins hard, and Circle's Coinbase renegotiation in August just got a lot more interesting. 👀

#Circle #USDC #Stablecoins #Blockonomi

👉Full Story Below👇

https://t.co/4TVQkLYbWU

[OKX @okx]

England. Argentina. Another chapter in a historic rivalry 🇬🇧🇦🇷

Play for today's gameday bonuses on Outcomes, presented by @Nesaorg

Claim your daily 500 points & take a shot → https://t.co/eRk2H4fGop

[Binance @binance]

Compete in the Spot RE Trading Tournament and share up to 1,000,000 RE Token Vouchers.

Join today 👉 https://t.co/myoOxBzQul

[Cointelegraph @Cointelegraph]

🔥 LATEST: Binance’s XRP reserves have stabilized at their lowest level since February, potentially easing selling pressure if demand continues to improve.

[Cardano Community @Cardano]

https://t.co/epm9LYFnRj

[Litecoin @litecoin]

the Litecoin Summit pulled 10,000+ live viewers on X today.

bear market who?

round 2 tomorrow. 🫡

[Ethereum Foundation @ethereumfndn]

6/ @eth_systems builds privacy technologies that help institutions execute financial transactions on Ethereum at scale.

Founded by former members of EF’s Institutional Privacy Task Force, EthSystems develops open source technologies to help enterprises and others with privacy and compliance requirements, all without negotiating on decentralization and security that are core to Ethereum.

https://t.co/tTjf1fzhBM

[Brian Armstrong @brianarmstrong]

It's unbelievable that I still can't make an event in Google Calendar from a natural language input.

[Arlington National Cemetery @ArlingtonNatl]

We do not consider playing "Pokemon Go" to be appropriate decorum on the grounds of ANC. We ask all visitors to refrain from such activity.