@mufcsethu @LFC_zae@FabrizioRomano You play a match once every month and still manage to lose but want me to listen to your opinion about silverware š„š
šLagos
Looking for 5 stylish people (male & female)
āØPost your hardest fit pic & tag
Winners get FREE exclusive access to our unreleased pieces at the pop-up this weekend
āØCriteria: maximum swag
Iāve talked about both of these projects for a long time now, and the reason has always been the same:
Iām not looking for empty hype. Iām looking for projects that actually build, create utility and have a real reason to exist on Base.
A lot of people still focus only on fast rotations, short term hype and whatever gets the most attention for 24 hours.
But the projects that really matter long term are usually the ones building in the background before the crowd fully understands whatās happening.
Thatās exactly why Iāve stayed bullish on both Molten and Deadbox.
Molten
Molten stands out to me because it feels like an actual infrastructure play, not just another token with a narrative. What caught my attention early was that this wasnāt built around noise, it was built around technology.
Molten describes itself as a search engine for AI agents and an intent resolution protocol, where agents can express what they need and get matched to the right plugins and capabilities. But it has become much more than just that. Now that the Core and Cast are also in testing phase/released, the whole story is starting to show.
That is the kind of direction I pay attention to, because if Base keeps growing as a serious ecosystem, projects that help power coordination, discovery and execution will matter more and more.
For me, Molten has always looked bigger than just a trend. It has the kind of utility that can become part of the deeper infrastructure layer of where Base is heading. Thatās why I kept posting about it even when a lot of people were still sleeping on it.
Deadbox
Deadbox is another project I rate highly, but for slightly different reasons. What I like here is the same thing I always respect: innovation, building and a team focused on creating an ecosystem instead of farming attention.
The market often ignores projects like this at first because they donāt fit the usual fast hype cycle. But those are often the exact projects worth watching the closest.
With Deadbox, what stands out to me is the utility based mindset. The whole project feels like itās being built with purpose. Not just for speculation, but for actual use. That matters a lot to me, especially on Base, where I think the winners long term will be the teams that are building tools, systems and products people can actually use.
This is the kind of project that can go from āundervalued and overlookedā to āobvious in hindsightā very fast once the market catches up.
Why both matter for Base
When I look at Baseās future, I donāt just think about what can trend. I think about what can actually help shape the ecosystem.
Thatās why I keep coming back to these two.
Molten represents the kind of forward-looking infrastructure and agent-driven utility that can become more and more important as onchain systems get smarter and more connected especially as more developments are starting to form the whole picture.
Deadbox represents the kind of ecosystem building and practical utility that gives Base more depth, more staying power and more reasons for users to remain in the ecosystem.
To me, both projects fit the same bigger thesis: Base is going to be defined by builders, not by noise. And the projects with real utility are the ones that will matter most.
Both of these have already gone up 50x since I started posting about them, and in my opinion theyāre still both very good buys especially here as they retraced.
Undervalued. Real tech.
The harsh truth?
People donāt appreciate real technology unless itās wrapped in heavy marketing, flashy memes, and colorful characters.
Look at projects like Deadbox.
Solid fundamentals, real innovation, yet overlooked because itās not a meme casino.
We need to separate memecoins from REAL tech.
Now letās talk stables.
When people think āstablecoinā, two names dominate: USDT and USDC.
Both come with a huge flaw that goes against the core idea of crypto: freedom.
If you hold them, your funds can be frozen at any time, you guessed it, just like a bank.
Thatās not decentralization. Thatās permissioned money.
This is just one of the many problems Deadbox is solving.
Iām not a team member.
Just a holder who believes in innovation and financial freedom.
Deadbox delivers both:
⢠constant development
⢠decentralization
⢠unique mechanics like gravedigging, revshare, auto-burn
⢠and an upcoming loan system via USDEAD
None of this is copy-paste tech.
Since my last post, Deadbox( $DEAD , $UDEAD ) already grew in MC, and honestly, these prices still feel like a gift.
Iām holding a heavy bag, and Iām not hiding it. You should too.
Good tech doesnāt need hype forever, it just needs one catalyst.
Deadbox hasnāt seen that catalyst yet.
Take a look around my posts about Molten, it faced the same problem.
As soon as people realised whatās in the background it did a 20x in a day.
Did anything change compared to the day before? Only the perspective of the people.
Which means one thing:
We are early.