delta

🧍‍♂️ 🌸 🎨 💻

[delta @delta_ice110]

@StandX_Official 👀

[delta @delta_ice110]

@StandX_Official @jimmyitsopen
@Stander_StandX #standx_gallery

[delta @delta_ice110]

Does this mean a screen where we can view the chart and Vault at the same time is coming?👀

[StandX @StandX_Official]

One screen for my vaults. One screen for zcash:native

Double the screens. Double the gains.

I can’t even imagine how fast my profits could grow.

(We’ll worry about the losses later.) 🧍

[delta @delta_ice110]

Among the recent selected works,
I still think @FlipeFly’s image really stands out.
@StandX_Official

[delta @delta_ice110]

I looked back at StandX-related content from June to August.

The shift is pretty clear.

June: Features
Most content focused on understanding individual features: SIP-4, Block Options, Maker Bot, Network Yield, and how each piece works.

July: System
With SIP-5, more posts started connecting SIP-1 through SIP-5 under the broader Universal Markets vision.

The focus moved from:

“What does this feature do?”

to:

“How do these pieces fit together?”
“What is StandX ultimately building?”

August: Building Blocks
Community Maker Yield, Community Vaults, BTC/XAU depth, and other live components became more visible.

Since SIP-5 / Universal Markets itself is not live yet, August was more about seeing its underlying building blocks operate in practice.

So the progression looks like:

June → Features
July → System
August → Building Blocks

One thing I noticed: content that is not centered on the product itself still seems relatively limited.

For example:

real trader decisions and trading cases
ongoing Vault Manager strategies
market analysis using StandX data
broader PerpDEX trends through a StandX lens
stories around traders, builders, and contributors

So far, most content has followed the evolution of the product and its SIPs.

After SIP-5 launches, I’d expect more content around Actual Markets:

what markets get created first
which markets attract traders
how liquidity, volume, and depth develop
which markets struggle
which Sponsors perform well

As more markets appear, the content may evolve further:

Actual Markets → Market Competition → Market Analysis

The conversation may gradually move from

“What is StandX building?”

to

“What is actually happening inside StandX?”

That may be the next major phase of StandX content.
@StandX_Official

[delta @delta_ice110]

The limited usage of SIP-1 / SIP-4 may not be about the features themselves, but about the market structure around them.

SIP-1 already provides the infrastructure to settle block trades outside the CLOB.
Today, however, the flow still largely depends on posting a block and waiting for a counterparty.

One possible next step is RFQ:

Trader submits size
→ multiple dealers quote
→ trader selects the best quote
→ settlement through SIP-1

This could improve both counterparty discovery and price discovery.

The first step should be simple: test RFQ on markets like BTC and see whether there is real block demand, whether execution can beat the CLOB for larger sizes, and whether traders come back to use it again.

If a real dealer market develops and capital becomes the bottleneck, Community Vaults could then help scale successful dealer strategies.

SIP-4 could potentially build on the same dealer network later, extending it to Block Options quoting and Reservation Fee price discovery.

SIP-1 / SIP-4 already have the execution primitives.
The next step may be building the market around them.
@StandX_Official

[delta @delta_ice110]

Stand as a Sponsor. https://t.co/9MCZenbcc1

[delta @delta_ice110]

@StandX_Official $XRP, $LIT, $DOGE
and $STANDX pre-market

[delta @delta_ice110]

Guys!

It’s not “a new feature” — it’s “new features”!

[StandX @StandX_Official]

Stress testing new features this weekend

[delta @delta_ice110]

@skypealt @Stander_StandX @StandX_Official stand new day

[delta @delta_ice110]

@StandX_Official Permissionless stander squishing

[delta @delta_ice110]

Markets StandX Could Target 🎯

Universal Markets may be about more than adding assets.

The bigger opportunity could be established off-chain markets that still lack deep, reliable on-chain access.

U.S. large-cap stocks are already becoming more accessible on-chain, but coverage outside the U.S. remains much thinner:

🇯🇵 Japanese Stocks
🇮🇳 Indian Stocks
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Stocks
🇹🇼 Taiwan Stocks
🇪🇺 European Stocks

And the gap goes beyond equities:

🌾 Agriculture — Coffee / Cocoa / Soybeans
📈 Rates & Bonds — JGB / SOFR / Bund
⚡ Regional Energy — Japan Power / JKM LNG
🚢 Freight — Dry Bulk / Container / Tanker
🌱 Carbon — EUA / UKA / CCA
🔋 Metals — Lithium / Nickel / Aluminium
📊 Volatility — VSTOXX / Regional Volatility

Some already exist on-chain in limited forms.

The opportunity may be less about finding entirely new markets, and more about bringing depth and accessibility to markets that are still underserved on-chain.

If StandX focuses only on BTC, ETH, Gold, and Nasdaq, it competes for the same traders and liquidity as other PerpDEXs.

But Japanese stocks, JGBs, Japan power, JKM LNG, freight, and carbon could expand what is realistically tradable on-chain.

For crypto traders: new markets.
For TradFi traders: a familiar entry point on-chain.

Universal Markets could be a bridge between on-chain traders and off-chain demand.
@StandX_Official

[delta @delta_ice110]

Hope this is a teaser

[StandX @StandX_Official]

Gstand.

Another day closer to 1,000,000 markets.

Pause for a moment, and stand. 🧍

[delta @delta_ice110]

@Stander_StandX @FlipeFly This image is high quality

[delta @delta_ice110]

@StandX_AG Stand

[delta @delta_ice110]

@StandX_Official Thankfully

[delta @delta_ice110]

Could $ZEC and $UNI offer a small glimpse into Universal Markets?

StandX recently added $ZEC and $UNI.

They may simply be new listings, but the contrast between them is interesting.

$ZEC is a privacy-focused crypto asset where trading interest can increase when privacy, regulation, or related narratives come back into focus.

$UNI is different. As the token of Uniswap, one of DeFi’s core protocols, it is a more established DeFi asset with broader recognition and potentially more consistent trading interest.

So these two listings represent different types of market demand:

$ZEC → narrative-driven demand
$UNI → established DeFi demand

This could be relevant to Universal Markets.

If Sponsors can eventually create markets, the important question may not only be how many markets can be launched, but also whether each market can attract traders, volume, and liquidity.

$ZEC and $UNI may simply be ordinary listings.

Still, they offer an interesting way to think about the different types of markets Universal Markets could eventually support.
@StandX_Official

[delta @delta_ice110]

Is solana:pumpCmXqMfrsAkQ5r49WcJnRayYRqmXz6ae8H7H9Dfn next? @StandX_Official

[StandX @StandX_Official]

New Listing!

ethereum:0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is now live on StandX with up to 20x leverage.

Unicorn mode activated.

[delta @delta_ice110]

@StandX_Official Unicorn mode🦄

[delta @delta_ice110]

What comes after Market Creation is Demand Creation.

The real challenge is whether new markets can bring in new traders, and whether those traders stay within the StandX ecosystem.

@StandX_Official
@Stander_StandX @jimmyitsopen

[delta @delta_ice110]

Stand ahead. https://t.co/GtF6uo0hUJ