🎒Anh em nghĩ liệu Robinhood có tạo nên làn sóng Memecoin mới trong thời điểm này không ?
Nhìn vào @TradePools nền tảng lauchpad Memecoin trên @RobinhoodApp vừa ra mắt với 2 dự án được nhắc đến nhiều nhất.
$FRONG cũng đã chia 4 từ ATH 18M$ -> 4M5$ và đang ổn định ở mức 5M$
$POOLS chia 4 từ đỉnh ATH 4M6$->1M2$ như hiện tại
Gần đây Poolstrade vẫn luôn nhắc đến biểu tượng chú ếch xanh. Nhưng nhìn quanh thì giá token Memecoin này không có quá nhiều biến động.
Robinhood vẫn là một hệ sinh thái mới. Và họ vẫn đang xây dựng để mạnh mẽ hơn. Nhưng với thời điểm market luôn khắc nghiệt như này thì cũng khó để đẩy Volume đạt ATH cao như Solana và ETH đã tưng làm được !!
hey @zacklabadie did you plan to use the frong:native creator fees in any way? are there any cause i can't figure out
i think you could do some cool stuff around this 👀
loved you uploaded the logo onchain and gave frong a visual identity. description also bangs
it's frong, baby🐸
frong:native was forged by @zacklabadie in the @tradepools trenches
this is the community-owned account
not official. no team. just FRONG 🐸
CA: 0x6245e67affA44a23077f0Ea7f981a8DC743a0c47
Join Telegram: https://t.co/IiTPAN27rj
the frong:native flywheel on @TradePools 🐸
liquidity only gets deeper
FRONG's trading fees never get cashed out. Every harvest is re-deposited into the pool and the LP is burned forever.
more trading -> deeper pool
nobody can pull it
view from the tool built by @cryptoclawin
if frong:native launched on @Pumpfun, the chart looks a lot uglier today
not because pf iss bad but because the liquidity design is completely different
on pf pre-graduation, trades happen on a bonding curve with every sell pushing the price back down the curve
fee split is:
> 0.30% creator fee
> 0.95% protocol fee
> 0% LP fee
so during the most violent early phase, trading fees do not thicken liquidity at all.
after graduation, a meaningful part of fees still routes to creator/protocol depending on market cap
@TradePools is different
@haydenzadams described the mechanism as:
> fees build up inside the LP position
> a searcher can claim them only if they increases the size of the liquidity position
> that means trading activity creates a natural incentive to deepen the pool
on frong:native, the trace showed:
> 35 fee-transfer cycles
> 22.8M FRONG sent through the compounding path
> around $119.5k worth of FRONG at the checked price
this is liquidity getting reinforced in real time so when the big sells came, they weren’t hitting a normal thin meme launch
they were hitting a pool that had already been getting thicker from trading activity
can i prove the exact alternate market cap if FRONG launched on pf?
not really. you’d need to replay every buy and sell
but the direction is obvious:
> same sells + thinner liquidity = lower price
> same sells + self-compounding liquidity = more survivability
this is why the launchpad wars matter
> the meme gets the attention
> the liquidity design decides whether it survives the first war
stay frong 🐸
$POOLS was the first token deployed through @TradePools
Earlier than $FRONG
Token ticker is $POOLS
Their official account is literally a Call To Action - Trade Pools.
I am more confident that this one is the main runner in this eco.
CA: 0x385b36Ff682Ab4C76E7c37A66b96aABC466471d5