DEO13815

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@HarriKonola @grok Maybe ask Grok what a first home of a 28 year old was in the 1980’s. How many square feet, bedrooms, all of it. I doubt your comparison is apples->>> apples.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@SternShark @Jason When (if) you grow up and can speak without sounding like an angry 5 year old, try again. Meanwhile, thanks for exposing yourself.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@arjunswritings @JensenHuang Anyone as sanctimonious as you is looking up at the lowest rung.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@SternShark @Jason Wrong. Having a stake, skills, qualifications are merely establishing standards. DEI is the exact opposite, being chosen based on completely irrelevant features relevant to the job.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@Peacedividend1 @Jason Nice try. That isn’t what he said at all. But good attempt to disingenuously reframe.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@mattwbaker Got it. Just your conjecture.

[Anthony Pompliano 🌪 @APompliano]

If they were able to get Jensen out in a few days, we must protect Elon at all costs.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@ANT_1515 @APompliano Use your imagination. This isn’t hard.

[Itamar Golan 🤓 @ItakGol]

דל״פ: המייסד והמנכ״ל האגדי של אחת מהחברות הכי משמעותיות בהיסטוריה האנושית לא צריך להתפטר כי היה לו רומן מחוץ לנישואין. זה עניין שלו ושל אשתו. שום דבר מעבר לזה

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@mattwbaker Do you have any proof or just your conjecture?

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@nealsengupta @christopherrufo If you were born here, you have no issues. Stop whining like a child.

[Lex Fridman @lexfridman]

NVIDIA letting Jensen go is a huge mistake, for America and for humanity. It's Apple firing Steve Jobs all over again, but much bigger, given the role of AI in defining the future of our world.

I've been keeping quiet on this out of respect for Jensen's family and team, who I've met and who are amazing humans, and because I personally hate infidelity. So my heart goes out to them in this difficult personal family moment.

But I can also say that Jensen is human, and makes mistakes like all of us do. Not that I matter at all, but I've known Jensen for a long time and have gotten the chance to spend a lot of time with him, behind the scenes, away from mics and cameras. I have seen him show kindness, humility, care to everyone around him, including strangers, including from the poorest most struggling parts of society, treating all the same with the same thoughtfulness and attention, because they are fellow humans and not because he has something to gain from them. That shows rare character, to maintain humility and humanity through all of it.

Another data point is what people who know him well have said privately to me about Jensen over the years. I've never had anyone tell me anything but how awesome he is or how much they love him. Probably over a thousand people at this point. This includes hundreds of engineers, CEOs, colleagues, friends, etc.

Also, since there was some spy talk. Jensen is as proud an American as it gets. I'm in shock frankly at all of this, including the mass hysteria around it. I love America, and I think NVIDIA letting Jensen go is terrible for America.

I stand with Jensen.

Love you all ❤️

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@SavianoAlan @APompliano He posed a question. Not allowed?

[citadel21 @citadel212]

@APompliano Facts don’t matter. This is about geopolitics and the attempt to kill open source AI and nationalize/monopolize super intelligence

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@Muxley14 @Frank54703905 So it sounds like you know exactly what the cause is. That makes it easy to figure out a solution.

[@jason @Jason]

The @nvidia shareholders should decide Jensen’s fate after the investigation is complete — not the press or online mobs.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@Owennfa @grok So anyone who has more than you and made better decisions than you owes you something? Likely a made up story anyway.

[DEO13815 @deo13815]

@nealsengupta @christopherrufo Did you come here legally?

[The Rational Animal 🤔 @theobjectivist]

Mark, you asked me what about the people who cannot get the charity they need. That question is your whole morality laid bare. One man's need is a claim on the lives of other men, and when the claim is not met voluntarily the state may come with guns and collect it. Everything else you have written is detail.

And you should notice who the claim falls on. The same people now building a case for a wealth tax are already building it against you. You have said you have enough. They will never have enough, because need as a standard has no ceiling. A man who grants the premise and then argues about the rate is handing over the weapon and negotiating the aim. Rand had a name for that. The sanction of the victim.

Now your history, which cuts against you at every point. Yes, in 1953 the most advanced thing in a hospital was a heart lung machine. It was brand new that year, it was wildly expensive, and the first patients who got it were the ones who could pay or the ones a surgeon chose to carry. Twenty years later bypass surgery was routine. That is how every expensive technology has ever reached the ordinary man. The rich buy the first units, that revenue funds the scaling, and the price collapses. Penicillin cost around twenty dollars a dose in 1943 and fifty five cents by 1946. The first CT scanner in 1972 cost a fortune and took hours. Nobody planned any of that. Nobody could have.

The same thing happens today wherever the government is not the buyer. An MRI billed through insurance runs two to three thousand dollars. The same scan at a cash imaging center is four to six hundred, on the same machine. Lasik and cosmetic surgery got cheaper every year while everything under Medicare pricing got more expensive. Cancer drugs are expensive for one reason above all others, the $879 million to $2.6 billion it costs to get a molecule through the FDA, and the moment a drug goes generic the price falls to the cost of manufacture, which is how imatinib ended up at $14.40 on your own website.

Your 80 million is not an argument against charity. It is the measure of what sixty years of your approach produced. A quarter of the country on means tested government care, and the price seven times higher in real terms than when it started. And the emergency room you keep citing is a 1986 law compelling hospitals to treat and pass the bill to everyone else. That is your system's answer to the poor, not mine.

Anyone who believes he can sit down and plan the distribution of medical care and technology across 340 million people is the one living in a fantasy. We have over a century of the attempt and not a single success. Britain's waiting list is above seven million. Canada buried 23,746 people off its waiting lists last year. Medicare missed its own cost projection by a factor of seven. No shortfall in private charity in a free country has ever come close to what socialized medicine does to men as a matter of routine. That is not my argument for capitalism, it is only the record against socialism. The argument for capitalism is that a man's life and his earnings are his own.

You say I live in a fictional past. The people who died on Canadian waiting lists last year did not.