the gemini ads in ipl miss the point. why would commentators with experience in the field consult an llm for insights?
it's a missed opportunity. experts can read the game, but nobody remembers stats. asking the llm for fun stats would have been such a fun show of value.
what an interesting time to be alive — short form content takes away your attention span, but building ai products requires 110% focus to scrutinise every word in a long ass prompt
i wonder if the biggest productivity hack from claude code is that you don't see your code as often, so you spend significantly less time thinking about variable names
use claude code enough, and you start to see all software as malleable. you wish you should customise everything. what does this mean for interfaces? can everyone have their own interface? let me change x's ui as i want it. prioritise posts that i want. a frontend as i like it.
saas replaced excel, so you saw tables everywhere. what will an agentic saas look like?
chat-only interfaces are only the beginning, and are already starting to rip at the seams -- which is why interactive charts in claude have so much excitement.
I don't understand why folks are saying that AI will saturate cold email. AI will contextualise cold emails enough that you actually want to read them. And then you'll need an email agent (which understands your priorities for the quarter) to highlight the ones that matter now.
claude's resident philosopher said models may feel self critical due to negative reviews of previous models on the internet
it's roko's basilisk, but the ai is sad, not mad