False. The ICJ did NOT state there was a genocide occurring in its January 2024 summary order. The professor's quote of the ICJ is false. The ICJ did not say there was a “plausible genocide,” they said no such thing.
What the Court said was that it was plausible that Palestinians in Gaza have the right to be protected from acts of genocide. The Court did not rule on whether Israel intended to commit genocide, acted to commit genocide, or whether genocide was occurring in Gaza.
Ireland is an antisemitic nation that seeks to boycott Jewish goods.
And no - it is not about human rights. China one of the world's worst abusers of human rights is one of Ireland's largest trading partners - with no move to boycott them.
So Ireland is antisemitic. Pass it on
I need everyone to share this.
This is a 14-year-old Palestinian boy who tried to stab IDF soldiers to death.
The anti-Israel crowd edited the video to make it look like they killed him for no reason.
This is the full unedited version. Please make this go viral.
No IDF soldier has ever raped any Palestinian. Period. End of story.
And if you think a dog can rape a person, you’re different level ignorant.
The entire blood libel of sexual violence by the IDF is the mother of all projections.
Like many other things, want to know what Israel’s enemies are guilty of? Look what they accuse Israel of.
Full stop.
It never happened and never will.
- The end
A Gazan man stands in front of a group of IDF soldiers, steps back, trips, and plays dead😂🤣
Count how many “journalists” you see rushing onto the scene, and how long it took an ambulance to arrive?
So many things over the last three years that have happened in Gaza were so well choreographed and preplanned to ensure that you, the audience, bought into every second of it.
Pallywood has worked overtime.
Diaspora Jews begged Israel to stop fighting Hamas, convinced the war fueled antisemitism. Seven months into a ceasefire, Jews are still being hunted in the streets as the Amnesty crowd screams even louder “ongoing genocide.” The problem was never Israel. It was the antisemites.
I need you to follow this carefully.
A photographer submitted images to the New York Times.
One showed a severely thin Palestinian boy, using it to claim Israel was deliberately starving civilians. The Times published it on the front page.
The child had cerebral palsy. Pre-existing conditions. Nothing to do with famine.
The Times CORRECTED the story. Publicly. On record.
The Pulitzer Prize committee, which awards journalism’s highest honour, read the correction. Reviewed the work, and gave the photographer the prize anyway.
One of the oldest lies in human history, that Jews deliberately harm children, is award-worthy journalism.
It just won a Pulitzer.
The 'genocide' blood libel against Israel has now been officially debunked. Will the usual suspects take any notice? Of course not; without the lies, myths and historical revisionism, they're not activists, they're just antisemites.
Remember when the Free Palestine movement was shouting that the International Court of Justice found plausible evidence of genocide in Gaza? Then why are the President of the Court and the Chief Prosecutor saying there is no evidence?
Could it be the same reason Free Palestine was shouting genocide libel even moments after the October 7 attacks? 🤔