@anisomorphism ye it becomes commutative algebra if u take the ideal corresponding to it, or algebraic geometry if u look at ideal sheaves on more general toric calabi yau's >:D
classical fact i learned today: if M is a random Hermitian matrix w/ polynomial potential V and W(x) is the large N limit of tr(xI-M)/N then the density of the equilibrium measure is given by -[W(x+i0)-W(x-i0)]/(2 pi i) ( equilibrium measure is large N limit of empirical measure)
@SC_Griffith but more abstractly one can view \Omega as a 2-form with values in End(E)... idk, i always feel like the last one to the party with this stuff. Apparently on the algebra side these kinds of situations are called curved dg-algebras.
@SC_Griffith In this case d^2 s_i = \sum_k \Omega_{ki} \otimes s_k where s_1,...,s_r is some kind of frame given by smooth sections of M \to E, and \Omega_{ki} are ordinary differential 2-forms which form the entries of the curvature \Omega when it's viewed as a matrix of 2-forms.
@anton_hilado mannn, every time i read something you write it motivates me to go deeper down a rabbit hole. i started reading up on motives after seeing your mathoverflow question about anabelian geometry and motives.
I think these are all good questions that I don't really ask myself, mostly because my only goal right now is to learn more math. I don't see much overlap between the people who claim these questions have universal answers and the people interested in math. I could be wrong tho.
Is math real? Is it discovered or invented in the confines of our mind? Why do some of us prioritize the pursuit of mathematical truth over other things in our lives?
Does math actually come from our desire to understand reality? It doesn't for me at least.