The truth about climate is the OPPOSITE of what they are telling us. We are coming out of an Ice Age: one of the coldest periods in Earth's history. There is no crisis, just natural warming, & it's a GOOD thing!
I LOVE CO2: 💚
When you understand that CO2 is beneficial to all life on planet Earth, that vegetation loves it, as well as plankton and phytoplankton, and that our greenhouse gases are 95% water vapour, and that CO2 at current concentrations or higher has negligible impact on temperature compared to water vapour. And that life adapts faster to increases of temperature & CO2 than in decreases in either. Then you will love CO2 for the rest of your life!
ANNOUNCEMENT: WE’RE SAVING SCIENCE!
We’re often told that science is “self-correcting.”
But that’s not really true.
Science doesn’t correct itself like a thermostat adjusting the temperature in your house. Science is a human institution run by human beings. And human beings are vulnerable to career incentives, groupthink, moral fads, political pressure, and fear.
And when those forces capture academic journals, peer review stops being a filter for bad ideas and starts becoming more of a credentialing system for fashionable nonsense.
This isn’t exactly new.
In 1996, the physicist Alan Sokal managed to publish a totally gibberish article in the journal Social Text full of trendy postmodern jargon. His point was simple: if you flatter the ideological commitments of certain academic editors, nonsense can pass as real scholarship.
Two decades later, @ConceptualJames, @HPluckrose , and @peterboghossian pulled off the “grievance studies” hoax, placing over a half dozen absurd papers in peer-reviewed journals. One paper used dog parks to analyze rape culture and queer performativity. Another rewrote parts of Mein Kampf in the language of feminist theory.
The problem wasn’t just that fake papers got published. It was that they were completely indistinguishable from the real thing.
And today, the problem is even worse.
We now have serious SCIENCE journals publishing papers about feminist lesbians marrying brine shrimp. We have disturbing papers that aim to “queer” and sexualize infants. We have scholarship on “lesbian-queer-trans-canine relationalities” and “trans-dog intimacies.”
But while Clown World papers are concerning because it makes a complete mockery of academia, the same broken, ideologically captured system is also publishing research in legitimate science and medical journals that pushes sex and gender pseudoscience, relies on deeply flawed data, and influences policies on the medical transition of children and young adults.
That’s not funny. That affects real people. It affects medicine. It affects law. It affects children.
And when critics try to respond, they often discover there’s no serious mechanism for correction. Submitted Letters to the Editor often go completely ignored. Contrary evidence is rejected without comment. As a result, the best critiques are often relegated to personal blog posts, social media threads, or newspaper op-eds, while the original paper remains in the literature wearing the armor of “peer review.”
That is untenable.
So Kevin McCaffree, editor-in-chief of Theory and Society (@Theory_Society), and I decided to do something about it.
Today, in the Wall Street Journal, we announced a first-of-its-kind article type called “Peer Review.”
The idea is simple: publication should be the beginning of academic scrutiny, not the end of it.
A Peer Review article can critique a paper from any scholarly journal. It can address problems with methods, evidence, logic, definitions, theory, or interpretation. But it has to focus on the claims and arguments, not personal attacks.
Submissions are capped at 2,500 words and go through a straightforward merit review instead of endless gatekeeping and ideological screening. We ask just one basic question: Is this critique coherent, serious, reasonable, or even popular enough to deserve scholarly attention?
If yes, it gets published.
And the authors of the original paper get a built-in right of reply, so readers can see the critique and the response in a legitimate academic venue.
That’s how science is supposed to work.
Science becomes self-correcting only when real people build the mechanisms that allow correction to happen.
That’s what we’ve done.
Now it’s time for academics to use it.
Read our announcement on the @WSJ below.
🔗https://t.co/gqkDE7aaDC
Antigravity researcher Amy Eskridge did not die in 2022. Next week, I will publicly release details that Amy faked her death and is now in contact with a reliable source I have known for several years who has shared stunning info about her current antigravity research at a secret research facility. I will share more details in my webinar today. https://t.co/v7VPNp01OY
Good God. The Canadians are more insane than the British!!! This is chilling a it demonstrates exactly why we need to fight to protect our rights and liberty. Some people think nothing of assuming extraordinary, illegitimate power.
‼️Canada Has Become 1984‼️
In Vancouver & Other Major Cities, People Are Being Snatched Off The Street & Involuntarily Committed To Mental Institutions For Criticizing The Government!
In The Last Week, The Case Of Nicholas Jordan Wagter Has Drawn Attention To The Expanding Medical Tyranny In Canada Where Psychiatrists Are Now Ordering The Forced Euthanasia/Murder Of Their Victims
In The Last Year Alone, Canada Has Euthanized/Medically Murdered More Than 100,000 People With 99% Of Them Being White!
🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:
https://t.co/GEFbh3EjlR
British police are hiding Henry Nowak’s final Snapchat and police bodycam footage.
18-year-old Henry Nowak was stabbed to death in Southampton. His Snapchat videos captured the attacker carrying a 21cm blade and saying “I am a bad man” – shown in court.
Bodycam footage captured the dying teen handcuffed by police, pleading “I’ve been stabbed,” “I’m dying,” “I can’t breathe.” He collapsed and bled out in cuffs.
Yet the full raw footage remains withheld from the public despite outrage and petitions.
Why hide a victim’s final moments if there is nothing to hide?
Release the Snapchat and bodycam footage now. Justice for Henry demands transparency.
There is a medical school in Texas requiring students to have a Covid booster. It’s against the law, but the student doesn’t want make waves.
If you need an exemption for the Covid shot, please email [email protected]. I do not charge for this service.
SURPRISE.
Guess who was awarded $26.7 million in funding by Bill Gates backed CEPI to develop a mRNA vaccine against Ebola just 4 months ago?
Moderna was.
And now the WHO just declared an Ebola outbreak in Africa a "global health emergency".
Dr. Naomi Wolf: “COVID VACCINES caused MASS HYPNOSIS. Two-thirds of the population no longer has the ability to reason, the shots DAMAGED the BRAIN.”
Two-thirds of humanity can’t think straight anymore.
They don’t react.
They don’t question.
They just… obey.
🚨BREAKING🚨- London 🇬🇧
Folks, this is NOT a drill!
If you’re in Ireland, Europe, USA or Oz - show the world the Hundreds of thousands of Brits are fighting back against mass migration!
Follow us and share
How does a guy get to block the sun, cover your "organic" fruit in film, insert fake meat into the supply chain, and bioengineer mosquitos to release vaccines without anyone's consent or approval and NOT be called a supervillain?