love Israel, trump is immune from law, Loomer n ben Shapiro are actual gods like Netanyahu n Jews can do no wrong. There that should do the trick :) Iran bad.
Michelle Dewberry Simply The Best ·
Kevin Langham ·4h ·
To answer your questions directly: No, the British Crown cannot unilaterally change the country from a Christian to a multi-faith state. And no, one man (the monarch) cannot decide this alone.
Here is why, broken down by law and constitutional practice.
---
1. The Legal Framework: A Christian Monarchy by Law
The British Crown is legally bound to Protestant Christianity. This is not just tradition—it is statute law.
· Act of Settlement 1701: Requires that all future monarchs "shall join in communion with the Church of England". Only Protestants can inherit the Crown.
· Bill of Rights 1689: Bars Catholics (or those marrying one) from the throne.
· Coronation Oath: The monarch must swear to maintain the Protestant religion and the Church of England.
· Succession to the Crown Act 2013: Removed the ban on marrying a Catholic, but explicitly kept the ban on the monarch being Catholic. No other religion is mentioned.
In short: The law requires a Protestant Christian monarch. A multi-faith Crown is currently incompatible with these Acts of Parliament.
---
2. Can the Monarch Change This Alone? Absolutely Not.
The monarch has no power to change these laws by personal decree.
· Parliamentary Supremacy: Parliament is the supreme legal authority in the UK. Only Parliament can make or repeal laws like the Act of Settlement.
· Royal Prerogative: The monarch's remaining personal powers (like issuing passports) are exercised on the advice of ministers. They cannot be used to override Acts of Parliament.
· Constitutional Convention: The monarch acts on the advice of the Prime Minister and does not intervene in political or legislative matters.
A monarch attempting this would trigger a constitutional crisis and almost certainly be forced to abdicate.
---
3. How Could It Change Legally?
The only lawful way to change the Crown's religious foundation is through an Act of Parliament.
· Full Disestablishment: Parliament could pass a law severing the link between Church and State. A "Disestablishment of the Church of England Bill" has been introduced in recent years, proposing to remove the monarch's title as "Defender of the Faith" and remove bishops from the House of Lords.
· Amending the Succession: Parliament could pass another law amending or repealing the religious requirements in the Act of Settlement.
However, the UK government has stated it has no plans to do this. Any such change would require extensive political debate and public consultation.
---
4. The "Multi-Faith" Reality vs. The Law
It is important to distinguish between constitutional law and social reality.
· Legally: The UK is a Christian state with an established church.
· In Practice: The UK is a multi-faith society. The monarchy already engages with all faith communities. Scholars call this "UK state Anglican multifaithism"—a practical coexistence, but not a constitutional change.
The monarch personally has freedom of conscience like any citizen, but as a constitutional office, they are bound by the Protestant requirement.
---
Summary
Your Question The Answer
Can the Crown change to multi-faith constitutionally? Yes, but only by an Act of Parliament.
Can one man (the monarch) decide this? No. The monarch has no such power.
Is this allowed in common law? It would require statute law (Parliament), not common law.
What would happen if the monarch tried? A constitutional crisis leading to abdication.
In short: Parliament holds the key, not the Crown. The monarch is the symbol of the state's faith, not its master. England is a Christian country and not one man can decide otherwise not even parliament. We need to have a referendum on the raw family and discuss whether it’s needed any further as we can quite clearly see that they are bought and paid for by the rot in our society!
See less
@UnityNewsNet@reform@RupertLowe10
🚨 IVERMECTIN VS. FENBENDAZOLE VS. MEBENDAZOLE: WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?
Millions of people have heard about these three repurposed medicines.
But very few know they work in completely different ways.
They often get mentioned together.
Yet they are not the same medicine.
Different mechanisms. Different targets. Different reasons researchers are studying them.
Here's what makes each one unique.
💊 IVERMECTIN
Researchers have explored Ivermectin for its potential to:
✅ Influence the WNT/β catenin pathway.
✅ Trigger apoptosis, the natural process of programmed cell death.
✅ Block importin α/β transport proteins.
✅ Affect cancer stem cells.
✅ Influence immune system activity.
✅ Interfere with mTOR signaling and other cellular pathways being studied in cancer research.
Researchers are especially interested in its potential effects on immune signaling and cancer stem cells.
💊 FENBENDAZOLE
Fenbendazole has attracted attention because researchers have explored its ability to:
✅ Disrupt microtubules that cancer cells rely on for division.
✅ Reduce glucose uptake.
✅ Trigger apoptosis.
✅ Influence angiogenesis and metastasis related pathways.
✅ Affect oxidative stress inside cancer cells.
✅ Support normal cell cycle regulation.
That's why many people describe Fenbendazole as targeting the "fuel and machinery" cancer cells depend on.
💊 MEBENDAZOLE
Mebendazole is being studied for several proposed mechanisms, including:
✅ Destabilizing microtubules.
✅ Inhibiting angiogenesis and VEGF signaling.
✅ Triggering apoptosis.
✅ Crossing the blood brain barrier.
✅ Influencing MYC and Bcl2 related pathways.
✅ Improving chemotherapy sensitivity in preclinical research.
Its ability to cross the blood brain barrier is one reason it continues attracting attention in brain cancer research.
Although these medicines are often mentioned together...
They are not interchangeable.
Many researchers believe their different mechanisms are exactly why they're worth studying, both individually and in combination.
One thing is becoming increasingly clear.
Repurposed medicines are no longer a fringe topic. They're becoming part of a much bigger scientific conversation.
As more studies are published, the discussion is only getting bigger.
📌 SAVE & REPOST this comparison so you can come back to it whenever you're researching repurposed medicines.
💬 Which of these three have you researched the most: Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, or Mebendazole?
💊 If you're independently researching Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, or Mebendazole, many people choose @rxmeds_store for pharmaceutical grade options trusted by thousands of customers worldwide.
#Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs
BREAKING: The real reason people quit Ivermectin isn't side effects - it's because nobody told them about TOXIN CLEARANCE
Here's what happened to Sarah, a cancer patient who almost gave up on Ivermectin after day 3...
She started feeling worse - headaches, fatigue, nausea. Her doctor said "stop immediately, it's not working."
But Sarah didn't know about the Herxheimer reaction - when parasites die, they dump toxins into your bloodstream.
The "side effects" she was feeling? That was her body trying to clear out years of parasitic damage.
Day 7: Sarah stuck with it and added proper detox support. Symptoms started to lift.
Day 21: Her energy came back in a way she hadn't felt in years.
Most people quit right before things turn around. They think Ivermectin is hurting them when it's actually WORKING.
The parasites are dying. The toxins are moving out. Your body is finally getting a chance to heal.
But nobody warns you about this part.
هذه ام وابنها مقيدين ينظروا نظرتهم الاخيره لبعض من مسلمى البوسنه وهذا جندى قذر صربى وهذه من مذبحة سربرنتسيا قتلوا ٨ آلاف فى يوم واحد واغتصبوا ٦٠ الف امرأه مسلمه
اليوم ذكراها منذ عام ١٩٩٥.
هؤلاء من يحاضروننا عن حقوق الإنسان وان الإسلام دين عنف #مذبحة_سربرنتسيا
🚨The government seems to be making a habit of burying stuff in the distraction of making Burnham king…
Er … the Home Office has quietly opened a consultation to repurpose your driving licence as a searchable identity file for the state.
Police access to DVLA data is currently mainly for road traffic issues.
The government wants to extend automated access to all crime! …. AND “policing purposes”, including cases where no crime is being investigated.
That could include your name, address, date of birth, photograph, signature, convictions and medical information!!!
MPs will only get a yes or no vote on the final regulations. They can’t amend them and this change to your privacy will not get a separate vote.
Sounds a bit like we’re becoming a police state to me 🚨
If you want to prove to someone that Charlie's shirt moves BEFORE the damage to his neck, show them this. It is unbelievable that anyone believes it was a bullet. At this point, I think some people just say they believe the FEDSLOP because their hatred of Candace Owens outweighs their love of the truth.
There was a holocaust. It's a fact. Video👇
Not the 'Holocaust' of 6 million jews (and 12 million shoes) by Germans, but the exact opposite — the holocaust of 2 million Germans by jews 𝙖𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 WW2.
The dynamic unfolded in three steps:
● The Surrender: These German soldiers surrendered to the Western Allies for a specific reason—to avoid capture by the 𝙅𝙪𝙙𝙚𝙤-𝘽𝙤𝙡𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙠𝙨 of the U.S.S.R.
● The Betrayal: Instead of finding safety, they fell into the hands of 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙟𝙚𝙬𝙨 and '𝙟𝙪𝙙𝙚𝙤-𝙘𝙝𝙧𝙞𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙨' of the Allied Forces.
● The Outcome: The jewish Allies corralled them into the real Death Camps and deliberately starved them to death.
Therefore, whenever a jew talks about the imaginary 'Holocaust,' counter it with the real holocaust — the genocide of White Christian men by jews.
Never forgive. Never forget.
Follow @Classicist9999: 'Holocaust,' a small pile of 12 million shoes, WW2, Hitler, Stalin, Churchill, and much more
🇷🇺 A Russian army officer who examined a chocolate bar found on the battlefield in Ukraine demonstrated why you never treat a Mars bar as a Mars bar in a war zone.
Writer: Mhedi
IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION
1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day).
LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:**
- Cancers in remission
- Strong family history or genetic predisposition
- Prophylaxis (preventive)
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished.
MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9.
HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared.
VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers.
**Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days).
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported.
**Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):**
- Low: ≤30 mg/day
- Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5×12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid)
- High: 120 mg/day
- Very High: ≥150 mg/day
Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary.
Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only.
Share to spread awareness — information. Follow for more .
✮✮✮✮✮ #WarRoomLIVE: Trump Refuses to Sign Landmark Housing Bill in Protest Over Stalled Elections Legislation, Federal Judge Orders DHS Not to Obey Order From Another Judge... PLUS, Disturbing Video Shows Unconscious McConnell Stretchered Into Ambulance – TUNE IN/SHARE! https://t.co/AbaBuCvSld
Bowne Report: Cheyenne Traces Rare Bacteria to Meta Construction Site
Deadly bacterium, Cupriavidus gilardii, linked to wastewater discharges from a contractor tied to Meta’s massive under construction AI facility.
» ʙʀᴇᴀᴋɪɴɢ ɴᴇᴡs ʟɪᴠᴇ: https://t.co/iRbKT1cEXq
It was Ann Widdecombe who famously said "there was something of the night" about Michael Howard.
Howard's real name was Hecht.
His father was a synagogue cantor.