I opened the LinkedIn draft my content agent made today and closed it after the first line.
It started with:
"Most agent projects do not break at the demo."
The point was fine.
The writing was dead.
No client call.
No messy workflow.
No screenshot.
No mistake.
No reason for anyone to believe I had been near the work.
That is the same failure I see when companies try to use AI inside operations.
They give the model a topic and expect useful output.
But the useful output usually comes from the raw material around the topic.
The call notes.
The broken handoff.
The weird edge case.
The Slack message where someone asked, "who owns this now?"
The log where the agent looked confident and still picked the wrong next step.
So I changed the content operator today.
Before it writes a post, it has to fill a raw material sheet:
scene
person or role
trigger
artifact
friction
decision
specific system detail
outcome
reader payoff
If those fields are empty, it is not allowed to write the post.
I think the same rule applies to business agents.
If you want an agent to write, decide, route, summarize, or sell, do not start with the prompt.
Start with the work packet.
What happened?
Who owns the next step?
What system has the source of truth?
Where does the handoff usually fail?
What needs approval before the agent acts?
A better model helps.
Better raw material changes the output.
If you are building internal agents, steal this rule:
no scene, no artifact, no friction, no output.
I thought why have both codex pro and claude max together at the same time so cancelled my claude max recently , but then this hype of claude fable 5 came yesterday and just took claude max again for the fable 5 only to see this shi today morning .. man its so annoyingg.. do i have to take a fucking 2000$ flight to SF to just use claude huh...
Just found about this -> around 1M$+ in startups credits ,
If you are a startup owner or vibe coder whos building something meaningful and grinding hard this is for you..
https://t.co/27kLbB4jof
I was using claude cowork to fix and security test client workflows and it gave me out free 3 invites of claude cowork for a week..
Feel free to redeem it if u guys wanna , cowork is godly imo.
https://t.co/YmuxiUqBRp
The start. Where it all began.
It's been 2 years since I got an idea called Hollerlabs and started it with my business partner @devautomates@Saisharan0099. But we ended up building a trend-following business one that changed based on whatever was popular in the market.
After 2 years of that, we realized we weren't really building anything. We were just taking ideas that weren't ours, adding a prompt, and shipping them. So we decided to stop.
6 months ago. One of the best decisions we've ever made because we actually started thinking instead of following.
If you look at my profile, my favorite quote says it all: "Building without thinking is just assembly."
We finally started working toward what we actually set out to achieve. Proud of what the last 6 months have looked like. Genuinely grateful.
The reason I'm writing this if you ever feel like you're not doing something you love, just stop and think. Most of the problems that stay on your mind have the simplest solutions.
built ChaseDesk with @devautomates and @Eswarlakkakula for bookkeepers who hate chasing receipts.
connect Xero → we find what’s missing → chase clients by email/SMS → OCR replies → post clean entries back to Xero.
month-end chasing, basically on autopilot.
Meet Higgsfield CLI + Marketing Skills.
Instead of burning tokens on bloated schemas, or shipping broken creative at scale, the CLI keeps agent spend lean and Skills keep output high quality.
Pairs with Сodex, Claude Code, Openclaw etc.
npx skills add higgsfield-ai/skills
the past few months as an engineer be like:
> do you want to proceed?
1. yes
2. yes
3. yes
4. yes
then i tell my colleagues "yeah i built that using Claude" , shipped X using Codex..
but did i build it or did i just have good taste in what to approve
as engineers and builders i am not sure whether we are getting dumber or smarter by going on this cycle..
Why Vibe Coding with Claude changed how I build in 2026
I used to fight with prompts.
Now I just describe the vibe I want and Claude gets it.
My daily flow:
• Start with the feeling (“clean, calm, fast”) instead of technical specs
• Let it think step-by-step like a thoughtful senior dev
• Iterate naturally in conversation
• Use agents to handle testing, refactoring, and edge cases
The code comes out better.
I move faster.
And honestly… coding feels fun again.
This isn’t hype. It’s just the new normal for me.
Anyone else fully in vibe coding mode with Claude or other agents? What’s one thing that surprised you?
@ApplyWiseAi the taste part is underrated. codex ships the code but claude is the one i trust when the direction is unclear. different tools, different jobs.