@gilbert_jc Rarely these days and when I do open it I realise how slow they are and regret it instantly. If I need to read code I usually reach for VS Code now.
@ClaudeDevs I love the unified view of background jobs, but one major issue I've found is that I can't paste into the prompt when running on Windows Terminal/PowerShell 7.x which limits it's usefulmess.
@niklas_wortmann A number of Skills created over the last four months or so to add some meat to the bones of this workflow:
https://t.co/atOvNIYG64
The additional skills are ones that ask questions about the plan to find anything that might be vague or ambiguous pre-PRD. Then reviews post Ralph
@quorralyne Using it daily. I create a plan/PRD with Opus, work through it, refine it until I'm happy. The hand the tasks off to Sonnet to implement. The back to Opus for review, and Sonnet to implement changes/fixes.
@jpaylor@cynthiamcgillis ^^ This. Also using a GitHub Action workflow to distribute Rules and Agents into the other repos on update so all teams have the same.
When you're in-flight meal is just a bread roll!
๐ท Nikon Z6 ii
๐ Sigma 150-600mm w/ FTZ II Adapter
๐ 600mm f/8 1/3200s ISO 500
๐พ Adobe Lightroom
@warnoc@clairernovotny@Aaronontheweb Installation is via Claude Code, and as the README says Claude will use the appropriate skills for the appropriate tasks.
https://t.co/eyi2XRbyzX
@mikejulian I like the PR review functionality inside of Rider over GitHub's web interface. So that combined with being able to view the code and it's references is where the IDE fits in for me now.
@gitphysical@nicbarkeragain I've said to a few people at work that in 10 years or so I can see the rise of Artisanal Code Houses that create hand-crafted bespoke software.
@jessfraz - Exactly
- Yes!
- Haven't done this yet
- YES!!
- I do Draft PRs to take advantage of adding my own comments to be fixed
- Quite!
Great to see some sensible takes on Twitter!