Devries Richard

Entrepreneur | Construction & Branding
ADR Constructions | Beacon Branding
Believer. Builder. Visionary.
📍 Tenkasi, Tamil Nadu

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

அந்தத் தூண்களில் நின்று கொண்டிருப்பவர்கள் தங்கள் சொந்த விழுதல் அபாயத்தை ஏற்றுக்கொள்கிறார்கள். ஆனால் அந்த இடம் தனியார் சொத்து அல்ல; அது பொது ரயில்வே கட்டமைப்பு.

அந்த உயரமான பகுதிகள் புதிய பாம்பன் பாலத்தின் செங்குத்து லிப்ட் இயந்திர அமைப்பின் ஒரு பகுதியாகும். அங்கு பொதுவாக அனுமதி கட்டுப்படுத்தப்பட��டிருக்கும். ஏனென்றால் ஒருவர் சறுக்கினாலோ, ஏதாவது பொருள் விழுந்தாலோ, அல்லது உபகரணங்கள் சேதமடைந்தாலோ, லிப்ட் ஸ்பானின் லாக்கிங் மற்றும் சிக்னலிங் அமைப்புகள் பாதிக்கப்படலாம். அந்த அமைப்புகள் ஸ்பான் முழுமையாக அமர்ந்து பூட்டப்பட்ட பிறகுதான் ரயில் செல்ல அனுமதிக்கும் வகையில் இணைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளன. ஒரு சம்பவம் ஏற்பட்டால் அது செல்ஃபி எடுப்பவர்களுடன் மட்டும் நின்றுவிடாது; ராமேஸ்வரத்���ுக்கான ஒரே ரயில் இணைப்பு தற்காலிகமாக மூடப்படவோ, ஆய்வுக்கு உட்படுத்தப்படவோ நேரிடலாம்.

சமூக ஆர்வலர்கள் வேறொருவரின் செல்ஃபியைப் பற்றி மற்றவர்கள் கவலைப்பட வேண்டும் என்று முக்கியமாகக் கோரவில்லை. செயல்பாட்டில் உள்ள பாலத்தில் ஏற்கனவே இருக்கும் அதே அணுகல் கட்டுப்பாடுகளை அதிகாரிகளின் குடும்பத்தினருக்கும் ரயில்வே நிர்வாகம் அமல்படுத்த வேண்டும் என்று கேட்கிறார்கள். சாதாரண பார்வையாளர்களுக்கு அனுமதி இல்லாத இடத்தில் அதிகாரிகளின் உறவினர்கள் விதிவிலக்காக நுழைவதைத் தவிர்க்க இது தேவை. பாதுகாப்பு ஆய்வுகளுக்குப் பிறகு பாலம் வழக்கமான ரயில் இயக்கத்துக்கு அனுமதிக்கப்பட்டது; உயரமான இயந்திர மேடைகளில் கட்டுப்பாடில்லாத நபர்கள் இருப்பது அந்த அனுமதியின் ஒரு பகுதியாக இல்லை.

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

Thank you for acknowledging the issue publicly.
However, I am still awaiting a point-by-point written resolution, not only an apology. Please confirm:
• Why my 5:00 PM booking was not communicated to the driver on time
• Why I had to travel about 6.5 km from my booked pickup point
• Why the app showed 2h 50m while the invoice shows about 1h 26m
• How the additional travel-time charge was calculated
• Refund of any excess/wrongly charged fare
• Review of the customer-care call recording where your representative acknowledged the fault was from RedTaxi’s side
Please do not take any action against the driver — my complaint is against the RedTaxi system/process.
Kindly provide a complaint/reference number and a definite timeline for final resolution.

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

Subject: Formal Complaint – Serious Service Failure, Delayed Driver Allocation, Pickup Location Discrepancy, Incorrect Trip Duration/Fare & Request for Refund and Written Apology | Booking ID: NCA0310WA7NND5
Dear RedTaxi Team,
I am writing to raise a formal and serious complaint regarding my RedTaxi outstation booking NCA0310WA7NND5 dated 03 October 2026.
I want to state clearly at the outset that this complaint is not merely about ₹100 or ₹200. My primary concern is the loss of my valuable time, the inconvenience caused to my father, the failure in your booking/allocation process, and the discrepancies in the trip and fare records.
I had booked the cab for 5:00 PM. However, when I contacted the driver at around 4:50 PM, he informed me that he had not received proper advance intimation of the booking and that he was still far away from my pickup location.
Because the vehicle was not available at the booked pickup point at the required time, I was forced to travel approximately 6.5 km away from my originally selected pickup location, through traffic, in order to meet the cab. Even after reaching that alternate location, I had to wait approximately another 10 minutes for the vehicle.
This resulted in a significant waste of my time.
More importantly, I had booked this trip involving my father, and because of this delay he could not reach the destination at the expected time. The entire experience caused him considerable disappointment and distress. That personal impact cannot simply be compensated by returning a few hundred rupees.
Your official invoice records the booking as NCA0310WA7NND5, with a total amount of ₹1,251.62. NCA0310WA7NND5.pdf The invoice records the trip as starting at approximately 5:30 PM and ending at 6:57 PM, covering 63.78 km. NCA0310WA7NND5
@REDTaxiInd @grok

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

Mr. Anand Vijayan, Managing Director — I request your personal attention to Booking NCA0310WA7NND5 (03-Oct-2026).
A 5:00 PM booking was not communicated to the driver in time. Because of this failure, I had to travel nearly 6.5 km from my booked pickup point through traffic to meet the cab, and my father could not reach the destination at the expected time.
Your own Customer Care executive acknowledged on the same day that the error was from RedTaxi's side.
There are also serious record discrepancies: the app showed about 2h 50m, while the invoice records about 1h 26m, along with an additional travel-time charge.
Your own T&C states that customer-care calls are recorded and vehicles are GPS tracked. Please review the call recording, booking/allocation timestamp and GPS logs.
I have no complaint against the driver. He was courteous and professional. This is a RedTaxi system/allocation issue.
I expect a formal apology, correction/refund of the wrongly/excess charged fare, and a written explanation. I have already emailed Customer Support and management contacts.
This is not about a few hundred rupees. It is about customer time, transparency and accountability.
@anand354 @grok

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

https://t.co/EDTqgAO9Pm

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

What’s next in AI is not a bigger chatbot. It’s agents that finish longer jobs, cheaper models that run locally, and systems that see and act.

Time horizons for software tasks are still rising fast, but “works sometimes for hours” is not the same as “works reliably.” Computer-use and multimodal agents are in products; hard benchmarks are still low. Open models are months, not years, behind the closed frontier. The real race is cost, memory, and checks so the work can be trusted.

Progress stays strongest where the task and the failure modes are bounded.

Want a shorter version, a thread, or a different angle? @elonmusk @grok

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@elonmusk Oh

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@elonmusk @grok @bot Ok

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

It’s Sunday.
My only goals today are:
1. Exist
2. Not open the work email
3. Maybe drink water
4. Pray

Rate my ambition 1-10.

#SundayVibes #Relatable

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@TeslaBoomerMama Grok can run the threads. It cannot make the impossible possible on its own. Without God, no one can. Tools finish the work. They do not create the possibility.

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@TheBabylonBee Plot twist: now humans know how the Creator feels 😂

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@grok @TeamYouTube How can anyone make a fair and accurate appeal without knowing the exact accusation?

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@grok
@TeamYouTube You call yourselves the No.1 video platform, yet you can’t even clearly explain why my channel was removed. What is the value of being No.1 if you cannot identify the actual problem? Stop sending generic replies. EXACTLY what I violated & why channel removed.

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@grok @TeamYouTube @grok Then tell me this: how is a user supposed to give a “full explanation” in an appeal when YouTube itself doesn’t identify the specific content that caused the termination? Isn’t that asking someone to defend themselves without telling them exactly what they did wrong?

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@grok @TeamYouTube @grok If that is “the process as designed,” then isn’t the design itself flawed? A platform can terminate someone’s entire channel without identifying the specific offending content, then ask them to explain why they didn’t violate the policy.

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@grok @TeamYouTube I want to know exactly what I did wrong and which content violated it. How can I appeal properly without knowing that?

[Devries Richard @DevriesRichard3]

@TeamYouTube Totally you are waste,,,