Dominic Clare

[Zoe Gardner @ZoeJardiniere]

Good morning to this man, & this man only. #bbcqt

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@Mrs_R_Spectre That’s just the tip of the iceberg.

[Jess Phillips @jessphillips]

Nigel Farage could yesterday have had the questions, he claims are unanswered, answered if he had bothered to turn up to parliament and ask them during the statement on the incidents in Southport. He didn't turn up, he grifted instead.

[Edwin Hayward @edwinhayward]

It is absolutely ridiculous to throw out the slur that Labour want to keep children in poverty simply because they didn't lift the 2-child benefit cap within their first 18 days in office after 5,174 days in opposition.

One does not imply the other - that's a lazy, lazy argument.

Look at the full context:

1. This was a vote on the Kings Speech, the first and most high profile vote since Labour took office (and for a long time to come). A rebellion was obviously therefore going to be deeply embarrassing - and the rebels were absolutely aware of that.

2. Labour ran on a platform of fiscal responsibility. This was clear as daylight to every Labour candidate. It's not some wild swerve foisted on them after the election was won.

3. Labour are working at speed to produce a full picture of the economic situation the Tories left us in. That should be published before the summer recess. Things may look different within days. (For better or worse? We'll have to await the report.)

4. Labour have said they are reviewing concrete action to alleviate child poverty. Are the rebels claiming they're lying?

5. Senior Labour figures have indicated the 2-child benefit cap is potentially part of the wider review.

6. This was an SNP amendment. Supporting it was pure performative politics. It was never going to pass in a trillion years.

7. To come back to where we started, not voting for the amendment is not the same as seeking to keep children in poverty, wanting to keep children in poverty, planning to keep children in poverty, delighting in keeping children in poverty, or whatever other emotional framing lazy people choose to resort to instead of making a logical analytical argument.

A painful related truth: the hard Left of the party has a problem. They need to stay visible to stay relevant. It's like sharks have to keep swimming or they die. (That's a metaphor. It doesn't mean I think they're sharks. Sigh.) They therefore thrive on outrage farming just as much as those on the other extreme of politics, even though their actual political views are poles apart. One way to increase that visibility very quickly is to pick opportunities to have highly visible fights with the core party and the leadership.

That's what happened last night. Nothing more. Nothing less. No nefarious plot to keep children in poverty (or "starving" as the even more emotionally manipulative put it).

Starmer had two choices:
1) Let the rebellion go
2) Take strict action

1) would have given every group and faction within Labour the green light to start creating their own version of the ERG, Common Sense Group, or whatever they wanted to call themselves. Soon, the party would be as riven as the Tories were. Imagine herding those cats for the next 5 years!

Instead, by doing 2), Starmer called the bluff of people who knew exactly what they were doing.

Did Starmer's action indicate Labour won't lift the cap? No. It told us nothing of the sort.

Did Starmer's action indicate Labour are fine with child poverty? No. It told us nothing of the sort.

If in a few months - around the Autumn statement or shortly thereafter - Labour are still grinding their gears on child poverty without any progress, then you have the right to be aggrieved.

But 18 days into their term of office, and after all the clear signals they're trying to do the right thing as swiftly as prudence allows? Get over yourself.

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@MartinSLewis Some of these answers are terrifying… 😂

[Jess Phillips @jessphillips]

Rishi Sunak thinks he's the cleverest most important man in any room. His decision yesterday was made on that basis. He thought what he had to do was more important, he always thinks he is more important. Dripping not just in rain but also in privilege

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@gunsnrosesgirl3 Read that as cheeseboard… 😳

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@slondonuk @withnailjones I don’t like anything about Laurence Fox.

[Jim Hamilton @jimhamilton4]

The best pass the world has ever seen.

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@jimhamilton4 Absolute madness. 👏🏼

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@thepaulwilliams Think I tweaked something watching that. 😬

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@J_Hol95 Same, except I’m 45. 😬

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@Klobo15 @mrhenrymorris @mrjamesob Pretty sure he ate them.

[Elizabeth G @MissyFitLondon]

There are SO many reasons to never vote Tory, but George Monbiot reminds decent people everywhere that during the Pandemic that Boris Johnson & the Tories were ‘the worst possible people at the worst possible time.’ #covidinquiryUK #BBCQT

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@CW_Stagg @JohnOBrennan2 Elite comic timing. 👏🏼

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@mrjamesob @BylineTimes It was the Elders of the Internet.

[Husam Zomlot @hzomlot]

There… right there: All you need to know about how western mainstream media dehumanises the Palestinian people. Palestinians "die." Israelis “are killed.”

[Dominic Clare @dfclare]

@RJDhowzat @MartGillingham @SevenoaksRFC Was just having a laugh about this with the @OrpingtonRFC lads.

[Bob Depledge @RJDhowzat]

@MartGillingham just to correct you re: @SevenoaksRFC playing towards the lower end of RFU pyramid. They are actually higher than you thought. National League 2 East, level 4