Triton Verbenero

Technological Survivor, reinvented everyday. Investing in experiences, learning from everyone. Keep Coding.

[Carlos Domingo @carlosdomingo]

Securitize Launches Tokenized Stock Trading for U.S. Investors https://t.co/HCUgEZdA0h via @wsj

[Nick Ducoff @nickducoff]

Eligible investors in the U.S., European Union and other jurisdictions will now be able to trade 12 stocks, including Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet, Tesla, Meta and Amazon, through Securitize’s regulated broker-dealer platform on the @SOLANA blockchain.

🤝 @Securitize

[Jorge Serna @jserna]

Proud to see @Securitize among the signatories of this industry letter to the Council of the EU and the European Parliament on the revision of the DLT Pilot Regime.

The direction is right. The proposed move from €6B to €100B is progress. But if Europe wants tokenized capital markets to actually scale, €100B is simply not enough.

And the important detail is that this is market capitalization, not trading volume. Some European projects already represent volumes of up to €350B. A €100B ceiling can become a constraint before the market has even had the opportunity to properly develop.

Our preference is simple: remove the cap for the regular regime.

If policymakers want to keep one, €1.5T is a much more realistic baseline, combined with the ability for the Commission to increase it as markets grow, without another hard ceiling above it.

There is another point in the letter that I think matters a lot: don’t create different scaling limits depending on which type of regulated infrastructure is doing the exact same thing. Same business, same risks, same rules. Otherwise we are protecting incumbent structures rather than creating a level playing field for new market infrastructure.

Europe has done something important by creating a regulated path for tokenized markets. Now it needs to make sure that path is actually wide enough to build a market on it.

[Carlos Domingo @carlosdomingo]

You can try it here https://t.co/CXO9leF5tq

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

@sheinix Pues parece que los rsETH fueron robados y no minteados, con lo que no habrá bad debt

https://t.co/UL4JBB3vBJ

[jfab @josefabregab]

On KelpDAO's rsETH incident:

Checked the chain and it seems like ~200m worth of rsETH was stolen, not minted out of thin air.

The attacker deposited the stolen funds in Aave to borrow WETH.

The position is technically backed, meaning @aave should have no bad debt.

Still monitoring.

[Jorge Serna @jserna]

We've just open-sourced a reference dApp for building on @Securitize tokenized assets.

One page. No backend. No SDK. Just React, ethers, and the contract calls.

From zero to buy / sell / redeem in a weekend (tops).

https://t.co/LyhB9Z3W6K

[Jorge Serna @jserna]

Good thread (and discussion with @carlosdomingo ).

I think there are two separate layers getting mixed here: legal ontology vs system design.

The taxonomy is useful, especially the distinction around “instruction tokens.” But I think the framing goes too far when it treats “instruction” as something ontologically inferior.

A security is not a physical object. It’s a legal relationship - an abstract set of rights. Everything we’ve ever used - paper certificates, book-entry systems, CSD ledgers - are just representations of that abstraction. None of them is the security in any fundamental sense.

If you want to get a bit Kantian about it: the security is the noumenon, the thing-in-itself as a bundle of legal rights. Everything else - certificates, ledgers, tokens - are phenomena, the ways we represent and interact with that abstraction. Arguing that one representation is “real” and the others are “just instructions” is mixing levels.

You could run the same critique backwards:
•a paper certificate can be lost and reissued
•a book-entry can be updated or corrected
•a transfer agent ledger is just an authoritative database

So calling tokens “just instructions” doesn’t really disqualify them. It places them in the same category as every other system we’ve used to represent ownership.

From that perspective, what matters is not whether the token is “pure bearer” or “chain-as-ledger,” but whether the system as a whole defines a clear, enforceable source of truth.

That’s where models like DS Protocol are often misunderstood.

The goal is not to pretend the token magically is the security in isolation. The goal is to create a system where:
•the token is the canonical interface for ownership and transfer
•the legal record and the onchain state are tightly coupled
•and the parties with legal responsibility (issuer, transfer agent) are explicitly part of the system, not hidden behind it

That’s not “intermediary cosplay.” It’s making the intermediary layer explicit, programmable, and verifiable.

The “key exchange = ownership” test is elegant, but it’s effectively a test for bearer instruments. And we already know why the system moved away from that model - AML, governance, investor protection, dispute resolution. Those constraints don’t disappear just because we use blockchain.

If you need:
•KYC/AML enforcement
•the ability to block or unwind unlawful transfers
•shareholder identification for voting and legal rights

then some form of controlled, accountable registry is not optional. It’s the system requirement.

So the real question is not “can we eliminate intermediaries?” but “can we redesign them so they are minimal, transparent, and interoperable with onchain systems?”

That’s exactly the space DS Protocol is operating in.

Market reality matters here too. The traction we’re seeing is not accidental - it’s because these models actually map to how securities law works today while still unlocking distribution, programmability, and new market structure.

So yes, great ontological framing. But the conclusion feels too binary.

The security is the abstraction. The token is one way to represent it. And the system around it is what makes it actually work.

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

@adamdaquant @mgrabina @grok https://t.co/GODooXWHQl

[tobal @tobalgarcia_]

11) Así quedo el resultado final de a dónde se fue la plata

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

@Paul_provalone @StaniKulechov https://t.co/GODooXWHQl

[tobal @tobalgarcia_]

11) Así quedo el resultado final de a dónde se fue la plata

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

Menos mal que compré la cafetera en la tienda oficial @DeLonghiUK

Huid de este producto, la calidad es lamentable. Huid de @miravia , la atención al cliente es inexistente, eres el blanco perfecto a cualquier timo.

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

Compré una De'Longhi Auténtica en Miravia, y me siento estafado, una auténtica vergüenza en todos los sentidos. Una cafetera tan cara que apenas ha durado 30 días funcionando, y ahora pierde agua por el difusor de servicio.

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

El servicio de atención al cliente, lamentable, más de un mes en proporcionarme la factura para poder aplicar la garantía en el servicio técnico.

Y el servicio de @miravia demencial, me siento completamente indefenso, un timo.

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

Join me at P99 CONF (free + virtual) for 50+ tech talks on building low-latency, data-intensive applications. 🎫 Register for free https://t.co/mdkLyv95tv #P99CONF hosted by #ScyllaDB

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

@KevinNegocios Sinceramente, me parece hasta educado que a 15 minutos de comenzar la boda de tu hermano y estando de vacaciones haya respondido de una manera tan coherente y calmada, yo directamente hubiera respondido a los mensajes a mi vuelta de vacaciones

[Andrés Pozo @apoz]

Reacción de PARTE de la comunidad acb/leb ante cualquier fichaje del @ZunderPalencia : ‘No sería titular en los Lakers. Carne de leb’. VAMO A CALMARNO. Nos encantaría hacer una plantilla Euroliga, pero la realidad es la que es. A currar, empujar todos y llegar donde podamos. 🤷‍♂️

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

@ianaya89 Te acabas de pasar X (aka. Twitter)

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

@chollometro No pole!!!!

[Chollometro @chollometro]

────▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█─▄▄▄▄▄▄─▄─▄─▄─█
───█─█────█─▄▀▄▀▄─█
───█─█▄▄▄▄█─▄▀▄▀▄─█
───▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀
IPHONE 14 128GB

Una de las personas que haga RT a este tweet y siga a Chollometro se va a llevar el Iphone 14 por la patilla.

Dale todo el ❤️por el poder del chollo! Vamos!

[W. Owen @wowenart]

Ha sido la primera vez que he probado un bolígrafo de 10 colores y ha salido este mini retrato de Ángel Martín. Qué complicado es dibujar rostros a este tamaño🤯

Se agradece un RT🙏🏽

[Triton Verbenero @dgalpaj]

@kinisoftware Solo desearte justicia, porque es lo único que te hace falta para brillar con luz propia con ese talento increíble que gastas. Un placer haber sido parte de tu camino y gracias siempre por lo fácil que pusiste todo.