The Queen of HYPOCRISY who insists โTHE DUCHASS OF SUSSEXโ be announced to EMPTY rooms, doesnโt want to be associated with the Royal family amid the Epstein fallout? But the UK Government should pay for their security? FUCK OFF MEGHAN!
Prince Harry, the modern Judas, sold out his own blood for Netflix millions. Now this traitor dangles an Invictus invite to lure a cancer battling King Charles onstage. Not love. Pure leeching off the throne he spat on. Not reconciliation. Exploitation for headlines. Pathetic traitor.
This man walked away from duty, trashed his family for profit, monetised private conversations, accused the institution of cruelty while still trading on its titles, and now wants the visibly ill King to stand on a stage as his emotional prop. Not out of respect. Not out of remorse. But because Harryโs personal brand is collapsing and he needs borrowed gravitas to stay relevant.
This is about money. The inheritance is gone, the deals have underperformed, and the endless pursuit of attention has burned through credibility. With funding pressure mounting, royal presence becomes a commercial lifeline. This is not reconciliation. It is desperation.
This is the same useless parasite who has done absolutely nothing of substance since rage quitting royal life except whine, lie, sue, and merch trauma. The same man who weaponised his fatherโs private health struggles for sympathy points, then disappeared when actual family presence mattered. Two brief meetings since a cancer diagnosis, yet suddenly he wants Daddy front and centre for cameras in Birmingham.
It is obscene.
Invictus was founded to honour wounded servicemen and women, not to serve as Harryโs latest PR laundering scheme. Dragging a sick King onto a stage is not healing. It is emotional extortion. It is calculated, cynical, and revolting.
Harry does not want reconciliation. He wants optics. He wants headlines. He wants legitimacy he burned to ashes by his own behaviour. And when the invitation is inevitably pending or declined, he will cry victim again, leaking stories about rejection while conveniently ignoring the years of betrayal that made this inevitable.
This man is shameless, useless, utterly despicable, pathetic, insufferable, and morally bankrupt. A grown man who mistakes proximity to power for purpose. A son who treats family like a consumable asset. A figurehead who uses wounded veterans as a backdrop for his personal redemption fantasy.
King Charles owes him nothing. Not a stage. Not a gesture. Not a photo op. Not forgiveness on demand.
Harry wanting King Charles to open the 2027 Invictus Games is not reconciliation. It is exploitation, pure and simple. Using a cancer stricken father to rescue a failing image is not brave or healing. It is morally rotten. Anyone still defending this performance should be embarrassed.
So Aitch is now running to the Home Secretary bleating on about a review of his security, and ordering her about. After his Father specifically asked him to "let the matter rest now" in the brief meeting they had last month.
He gets full security when in the UK anyway. This, imo, is all about IPP and immunity from prosecution, plus access to classified files - can you imagine what the Desperate Housewife would do with that, especially if she got her hands on anything concerning C & W, perish the thought!!
This endless pestering has to stop, the King can't do anything, the men in grey suits can't influence it... neither will bullying and relentless childish nagging! Give it up man, and use the millions you've made by selling your family out to pay for your security - because my taxes sure as hell aren't going your way!...
๐ธ ๐ฐ ๐ซ
I'm sure Harry will say one day that there were three of them in their marriage, Harry, Meghan and Markus Anderson. Why Markus is always there is super weird. Does Meghan always need her best friend there for moral support? It's just a bit bizarre.
'The Sussexes have done absolutely nothing... What charlatans to accept this award!'
@LeescoLee3 balks at the Prince Harry and Meghan Markle being bestowed a 'Humanitarian of the Year' award, calling them 'philanthropic poison'.
To me personally, it is a matter of considerable perplexity and disappointment that Prince Andrew and Fergie have shown themselves to have been so disingenuous with regards to their friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.
I appreciate that they felt trapped in an invidious position from which they needed to extricate themselves with what we can politely call finesse.
But the emerging two-facedness of the couple is showing how foolish they truly were. As someone who got caught up in his duplicitous denials to the extent that I ended up having to sue the Daily Mirror for libel, thereby involving me in nearly four years of the most stressful litigation, I feel I am well placed to observe that all they needed to do - and should've done from the outset - was play with a straight bat.
They could've - and should've - said what everyone with even peripheral knowledge of the matter believed, including Peter Mandelson and Tony Blair, namely that Jeffrey Epstein was a sleazebag who availed himself on a daily basis of the services of young women whom he paid to provide him with relief, and while this was morally degenerate in the eyes of many, insofar as they were concerned he had broken no laws and they felt it was none of their business what he did in his personal life.